Tag Archives: television

Matthew Kordelski cover letter

https://mattkprovideo.com/2018/02/22/matthew-kordelski-cover-letter/

Matthew S. Kordelski

Austin, Tx 78741

mattkprovideo@yahoo.com

I would like to join your video production team as a shooter / editor and motion graphics animator.

This is my newest Video / Animation website:   https://mattkprovideo.com/

I have extensive knowledge in all of the latest video editing, 2D and 3D animation techniques.  I know how to use Photoshop, After Effects and Cinema 4D to create memorable videos.  My skill set is so varied that I can also do graphics design work for print or web projects.  These videos were created using traditional pencil drawings, Flash, Photoshop and After Effects:

https://mattkprovideo.com/2017/01/28/busy-bee-artex-funding/

https://mattkprovideo.com/2017/03/27/animated-locksmith-commercial/

https://mattkprovideo.com/2015/09/12/dem-bunions/      

In addition to twenty years of professional experience in video production, I have 4 college degrees: A “Marketable Skills Award” from NorthWest Vista Colleges’ DVCP program, a BA from Rowan University in NJ, and 2 certificates (Animation and Motion Graphics) from Austin Community College. 

At SUNSET DIRECT I was charge of their video department (AVID editing and Beta SP cameras), taking ideas for their clients from concept to finished program, sometimes all on my own, and other times with the aid of a small team of artists and copywriters. I would write or co-write, shoot, edit and add graphics to corporate videos for a variety of high tech clients from 1997 to 2001.

I edited the feature documentaries “The Least of My Brothers,”        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFNMOlUgNP4

“Rage in The Cage”                                                                             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JY1zk6GQSU

“Blood Sweat and Teeth”                                                                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWt91daGsiQ

  and “Hi Im Fred B”                                                                           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRqvYvB2fzc

and I edited the  independent children’s drama “Sweetwater”.

My long term career goals are to be a part of a winning team and be in a creative productive environment that I can contribute to and help everyone over achieve. I’ve used the Media 100, AVID Media Composer, Final Cut Pro ( 7 and X) and Adobe CC (Premiere, Photoshop/After Effects) to make TV commercials and corporate training videos.

These corporate videos were created by me with a DSLR, slider and After Effects and Premiere:

https://mattkprovideo.com/2016/09/19/corporate-video-austin/

As a freelance producer I have shot, edited and animated & live  music videos ( https://mattkprovideo.com/2018/02/15/am5live-promo/  ) and I have been traveling around the state running a wedding video service for the past 3 years:

http://austintxweddingvideo.com

Video Gallery

I know how to go above and beyond “normal” working conditions and live what I do to exceed expectations. I know how to camp out at work and “live” a project till completion and beat deadlines while exceeding client expectations.

In addition to animation and graphics, I also have professional experience in shooting and editing (Final Cut Pro and Premiere) and even in voice acting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhcmjnQ1MFI      and      http://youtu.be/dVA8OxCkSNY  ).

I thank you for reading this and I look forward to meeting you:

Sincerely

Matt Kordelski

 https://mattkprovideo.com/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3021382/?ref_=fn_al_nm_2

http://www.youtube.com/user/mattkprovideo

Artex Safe

Artex Combination safe 

 

“Old timey combination safe” animation, adobe flash part of an upcoming commercial for Artex Funding

Cartoon animation/ drawing created in Adobe Flash. Part of an upcoming commercial for Artex Funding.

Logo Removal, After Effects

 

mattkprovideo.com/2017/11/09/logo-removal-after-effects/

A client wanted the red tape on the football players shirt removed. The tape was covering up a copyrighted logo. I exported the files into an Adobe Photoshop Stack, then used the clone tool to cover up the red tape.

 

Then I imported them into Adobe After Effects, and sequenced them back into order.

1999 Doc

Gerry Anderson – The Space 1999 Documentary (1995)

mattkprovideo.com/2017/10/19/1999-doc/

Space: 1999 is a British science-fiction television series that ran for two seasons and originally aired from 1975 to 1977.[1] In the opening episode, set in the year 1999, nuclear waste stored on the Moon’s far side explodes, knocking the Moon out of orbit and sending it, as well as the 311 inhabitants of Moonbase Alpha, hurtling uncontrollably into space. The series was the last production by the partnership of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson and was the most expensive series produced for British television up to that time. The first series was co-produced by ITC Entertainment and Italian broadcaster RAI, while the second series was produced solely by ITC.

Two series of the programme were produced, each comprising twenty-four episodes. Production of the first series was from November 1973 to February 1975; production of the second series was from January 1976 to December 1976.

The premise of Space: 1999 centres on the plight of the inhabitants of Moonbase Alpha, a scientific research centre on the Moon. Humanity had been storing its nuclear waste in vast disposal sites on the far side of the Moon, but when an unknown form of electromagnetic radiation is detected, the accumulated waste reaches critical mass and causes a massive thermonuclear explosion on September 13, 1999. The force of the blast propels the Moon like an enormous booster rocket, hurling it out of Earth orbit and into deep space at colossal speed, thus stranding the 311 personnel stationed on Alpha.[2] The runaway Moon, in effect, becomes the “spacecraft” on which the protagonists travel, searching for a new home. Not long after leaving Earth’s solar system, the wandering Moon passes through a black hole and later through a couple of “space warps” which push it even further out into the universe. During their interstellar journey, the Alphans encounter an array of alien civilizations, dystopian societies, and mind-bending phenomena previously unseen by humanity. Several episodes of the first series hinted that the Moon’s journey was influenced (and perhaps initiated) by a “mysterious unknown force”, which was guiding the Alphans toward an ultimate destiny. The second series used more simplified “action-oriented” plots.

The first series of Space: 1999 used a “teaser” introduction, sometimes called a “hook” or “cold open“. This was followed by a title sequence that managed to convey prestige for its two main stars, Landau and Bain (both separately billed as ‘starring’), and to give the audience some thirty-plus fast cut shots of the forthcoming episode. The second series eliminated this montage. The programme would then offer four ten-to-twelve minute long acts (allowing for commercial breaks in America) and finished with a short (and, in the second series, often light-hearted) “epilogue” scene. In 2004, the American science fiction screenwriter Ronald D. Moore stated the style of the first season’s opening credits of Space: 1999inspired the opening credit sequence for his acclaimed remake of Battlestar Galactica.

The headline stars of Space: 1999 were American actors Martin Landau and Barbara Bain, who were married at the time and had previously appeared together in Mission: Impossible. In an effort to appeal to the American television market and sell the series to one of the major U.S. networks,[3] Landau and Bain were cast at the insistence of Lew Grade against the objections of Sylvia Anderson, who wanted British actors. Also appearing as regular cast members were the Canadian-based British actor Barry Morse (as Professor Victor Bergman in the first season) and Hungarian-born, US-raised Catherine Schell (as the alien Maya in the second season). Before moving into the role of Maya during the second series, Catherine Schell had guest-starred as a different character in the Year One episode “Guardian of Piri“. The programme also brought Australian actor Nick Tate to public attention. Roy Dotrice appeared in the first episode as Commissioner Simmonds, and at the end of the episode it appeared that he would be a regular character; however by the second (transmitted) episode the character vanished, reappearing partway through the first season in the episode “Earthbound“, his only other appearance on the show (in which the character is permanently written out).

Over the course of its two series, the programme featured guest appearances by many notable actors including Christopher LeeMargaret LeightonRoy DotriceJoan CollinsJeremy KempPeter CushingJudy GeesonJulian GloverIan McShaneLeo McKernBillie WhitelawRichard JohnsonPatrick TroughtonPeter BowlesSarah DouglasDavid ProwseIsla BlairStuart Damon and Brian Blessed. (Blair, Damon and Blessed each appeared in two different episodes portraying two different characters.)[4][5] The English actor Nicholas Young (who portrayed John in the original version of The Tomorrow People) appeared in an episode of Year Two, “The Bringers of Wonder”. Several guest stars went on to appear in the Star Wars films, including Dave Prowse, Peter Cushing, Julian Glover, Christopher Lee, Brian Blessed, Michael CulverMichael SheardRichard LeParmentierShane RimmerAngus MacInnes, and Jack McKenzie.

Space: 1999 was the last in a long line of science-fiction series that Gerry and Sylvia Anderson produced as a working partnership, beginning with Supercar in the early 1960s and including the famed marionette fantasy programmes Fireball XL5StingrayThunderbirdsCaptain Scarlet and the MysteronsJoe 90 and The Secret Service, as well as the live-action sci-fi drama UFOSpace: 1999 owes much of the visual design to pre-production work for the never-made second series of UFO, which would have been set primarily on the Moon and featured a more extensive Moonbase.

Space: 1999 drew a great deal of visual inspiration (and technical expertise) from the 1968 Stanley Kubrick film 2001: A Space Odyssey. The programme’s special effects director Brian Johnson had previously worked on both Thunderbirds (as Brian Johncock) and 2001.

In 1972, Sir Lew Grade, head of ITC Entertainment, proposed financing a second series of the Century 21 production UFO to show-runners Gerry and Sylvia Anderson. Grade had one stipulation: the new series would be set primarily on the Moon within the environs of an expanded SHADO Moonbase; the ratings indicated the Moon-centric episodes had proved more popular with the viewers. The Andersons and their team would quickly revamp the production, flashing ahead nearly twenty years for UFO: 1999 with Commander Ed Straker and the forces of SHADO fighting their alien foes from a large new Moonbase facility.

However, toward the end of its run, UFO experienced a drop in ratings in both America and the UK; nervous ITC executives in both countries began to question the financial viability of the new series, and support for the project collapsed. In the meantime, Production Designer Keith Wilson and the art department had made considerable progress in envisioning the look and design of the new series. Their work was then shelved for the foreseeable future.[6]

Anderson would not let the project die; he approached Grade’s number two in New York, Abe Mandell, with the proposal for taking the research and development done for UFO: 1999 and creating a new science fiction series. Mandell was amenable, but stated he did not want a series set featuring people “having tea in the Midlands” and forbade any Earth-bound settings. Anderson responded that in the series opener, he would “blow up the Earth”. Mandell countered that this concept might be off-putting to viewers, to which Anderson replied he would “blow up the Moon”.[7]

The Andersons reworked UFO: 1999 into a new premise: Commander Steven Maddox controlled the forces of WANDER, Earth’s premier defence organisation, from Moon City, a twenty-mile wide installation on the Moon. Maddox would view all aspects of Earth defence from Central Control, a facility at the hub of the base and accessible only by Moon Hopper craft, which would require the correct pass-code to traverse Control’s defensive laser barrier. The Commander would also have access to a personal computer called “Com-Com” (Commander’s Computer), which would act as a personal advisor, having been programmed with the Commander’s personality and moral sense.

In the half-hour opening episode “Zero-G” penned by the Andersons, Earth’s deep space probes have discovered an advanced extraterrestrial civilisation. Maddox is kidnapped for an interview with the aliens. Angered by humanity’s innate hostility and WANDER’s defensive posture, they travel to Earth with the intent of isolating mankind within the boundary of Earth’s atmosphere. Having judged Maddox a noble example of mankind, they return him unharmed. They then use a beam to reduce the Moon’s gravitational influence to zero, sending it careening out of orbit into deep space.[8]

The project continued forward. Group Three Productions (a partnership of the Andersons and production executive Reg Hill) would produce the series; ITC Entertainment and Italian broadcaster RAI would provide the funding. Grade, aiming for a US network sale, insisted the series have American leads and employ American writers and directors. George Bellak, a well-known American television writer, was brought on staff. As stated by series writers Christopher Penfold and Johnny Byrne, it was Bellak who created and polished the series’ defining concepts. Bellak wrote a ninety-minute opening episode titled “The Void Ahead”, which was a close forerunner of “Breakaway“. Bellak also set up a writers’ guide defining the three leads, the facilities of the Moonbase and potential storylines.

At this point, the staff seemed to make creative changes that brought the series closer in concept and appearance to 2001: A Space Odyssey. Even the title Space: 1999 evoked comparison with Kubrick’s film. (Before, the title of the new series had greatly varied: Space Journey: 1999Journey in SpaceMenace in Space and Space Invaders—the invaders of the last title being the Earthmen trapped on the runaway Moon.)

For the lead characters of John Koenig and Helena Russell, Gerry Anderson approached the husband-and-wife acting team of Martin Landau and Barbara Bain. Landau and Bain were high-profile stars in America after three years on the popular CBS espionage series Mission: Impossible. Producer Sylvia Anderson let it be known that she would have preferred British lead actors; since Grade insisted on Americans, she would have chosen Robert Culp (star of the 1960s espionage series I Spy) and Katharine Ross (co-star of 1960s blockbuster movies The Graduate and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid).[6] Lee H. Katzin, a highly respected American television director with a speciality for pilot episodes, was selected to helm the opening segment and brought into the fold as a primary director for the remainder of the series.

Special effects, design and music[edit]

Special Effects Brian Johnson
Production Designer Keith Wilson
Year One Production Personnel
Story Consultant Christopher Penfold
Script Editors Edward di Lorenzo
Johnny Byrne
Moon City Costumes Rudi Gernreich
Year Two Production Personnel
Script Editor Fred Freiberger
Production Executive Reg Hill
Costume Designer Emma Porteous

The show’s vehicles, including the Eagle space shuttle and the Moon Buggy, were represented with a mixture of full-sized props, photographic blow-ups, and detailed scale models. Dozens of models for the various alien spaceships and the Mark IX Hawk from the “War Games” episode were built by model maker Martin Bower, often at several different sizes to account for the intended use.[citation needed]

Rather than relying on the expensive and time consuming blue screen process, as for Star Trek, Johnson’s team often employed a technique that went back to the earliest days of visual effects: spacecraft and planets would be filmed against black backgrounds, with the camera being rewound for each successive element. As long as the various elements did not overlap, this produced convincing results. In technical terms, the advantage was that all of the elements were recorded on the original negative, as opposed to blue screen, which would have involved several generations of duplication. Another plus was that the camera’s exposed negative contained completed effects—once this film was lab processed—thereby avoiding the costly, in time and money, blue screen “optical” technique. The disadvantage was that the number of possible angles was more limited; for instance, a spaceship could be seen approaching a planet from the side, but could not move in front of it without the elements overlapping.[9]

Special effects director Brian Johnson and most of his team went on to work on Ridley Scott‘s Alien, followed by The Empire Strikes Back.

Space: 1999 used Pinewood Studios sound-stages L and M. Each studio measures 90′ x 105′ (27 m x 32 m), with a floor-to-grid measurement of 30 feet (9 m). For the first series, Stage L housed the “standing sets”; such as Main Mission, the Eagle interior, the travel tube, and a small section of corridor. Due to the limited studio space, other sets depicting Alpha interiors, such as Medical Centre, were assembled as needed. Stage M was the “swing stage” – used for planet exteriors, spaceship interiors, and whatever else was needed for a given episode.

The unisex “Moon City” uniforms for the first series were created by renowned Austrian fashion designer Rudi Gernreich, a personal friend of series star Barbara Bain. Other costumes were designed by Production Designer Keith Wilson, who was also responsible for set design. Wilson’s innovative Moonbase set construction, using 4-by-8-foot (120 by 240 cm) plastic foam-board panels, linked together Lego-like into whatever room configuration was required, made for a uniform and realistic appearance for the Alpha interiors (not to mention being relatively cheap and quickly assembled).[9] A muted colour palette and the integration of recognisable equipment and accessories added to the verisimilitude.[citation needed]

For the second series, the Moonbase uniforms were updated and coloured decorative stitching and turtleneck collars were added, as were various badges and patches. Red, navy, or dark-green jackets also appeared, originally on just the senior staff, then on many of the male extras. The female characters tended to wear skirts and knee high boots throughout the second series, rather than the flared trousers used in Year One. The costumes for Year Two were designed by Emma Porteous, who later designed the wardrobes for several James Bond films.[10]

The Moonbase interiors were also upgraded for the second year, with the existing stock of wall panels, doors, computer panels, etc. (along with some bits from other Anderson productions) being assembled for the first time—on Stage L–into a standing complex of interconnected sets (the first series’ sets had been assembled as needed and the size of the Main Mission/Command Office complex was prohibitive for the construction of a lasting series of rooms.)[9] Vibrant colour was much more evident in this series’ Moonbase sets. Gadgets and equipment with a futuristic appearance typical of contemporary science fiction were also more evident. For example, Helena no longer used a stethoscope, but a little beeping, all-purpose medical scanner similar to Dr McCoy’s whistling medical “tricorder” on Star Trek.

The opening credits for the first series featured a dramatic fanfare composed by long-time Anderson associate Barry Gray, whose scores for the series were his final compositions for an Anderson production. Gray scored five episodes—”Breakaway“, “Matter of Life and Death“, “Black Sun”, “Another Time, Another Place“, and “The Full Circle” — Vic Elms provided a completely electronic score for “Ring Around the Moon“, and Big Jim Sullivan performed a one-off sitar composition for “The Troubled Spirit“. Library music, classical compositions, and score excerpts from earlier Anderson productions augmented the five Gray scores and gave the impression of an expansive musical repertoire[citation needed].

The second series was scored by jazz musician and composer Derek Wadsworth; American producer Fred Freiberger wanted a more “driving, searing” score for his new action-adventure format.[9] Aside from the new theme music, which was more synthesised than the theme for Year One, Wadsworth also composed original music for the episodes “The Metamorph“, “The Exiles“, “One Moment of Humanity“, “The Taybor“, and “Space Warp“. Much of this music was reused in other episodes.

Other Anderson shows influenced the Space: 1999 spacecraft and elements. The cockpit of the Eagle has a slight resemblance to the cockpit of an earlier Anderson Supermarionation series, Fireball XL5. Thruster and engine sounds were similar to those previously used in Fireball XL5Thunderbirds, and Captain Scarlet. Lighting effects for Moonbase Alpha were comparable to those from UFO, as well as the concept of the elevating spacecraft launch pad.

After almost 30 years, the original Moonbase Alpha model reappeared in the public eye online when a site gained exclusive access to photomap the model and solicit its sale.[11]

Series One[edit]

As the November 1973 start date approached, George Bellak fell out with Gerry Anderson over creative issues and left the production. Story consultant Christopher Penfold acted as head writer, bringing in American writer Edward di Lorenzo and Irish poet Johnny Byrne as script editors. Penfold reworked Bellak’s opening episode into a one-hour draft first re-titled “Turning Point”, then finalised as “Breakaway”.[12]

One week before live action filming commenced, Visual Effects Supervisor Brian Johnson and his team began work on the visual effects sequences for the first episode at Bray Studios near MaidenheadBerkshire on 5 November 1973. For the first six weeks, no usable footage resulted until the team discovered a dragging brake[clarification needed] had affected film speed. Studio rehearsals commenced at Elstree Studios near BorehamwoodHertfordshire on 12 November 1973. During filming of the first episode, it became apparent that the troubled Elstree was under the threat of imminent closure. One weekend, the company secretly relocated sets, props, costumes, etc., to the nearby Pinewood Studios at Iver HeathBuckinghamshire, resulting in a union blacklisting of the production.[7]

Scheduled for ten days’ filming, “Breakaway” overran an additional fifteen days. Lee Katzin was a perfectionist and demanded take after take of scenes; even coverage of reaction shots of the background extras required running a whole scene from beginning to end.[13] His two-hour director’s cut was assembled and sent to ITC New York for a viewing. Abe Mandell was horrified by the finished product. Anderson re-wrote several key scenes and, after three days of re-shoots, re-edited the pilot into a one-hour episode that appeased the fears of ITC. Katzin was not asked back to the programme after the filming of his second episode “Black Sun”, which also ran over schedule.

Scheduled for a twelve-month shoot, the twenty-four episodes took fifteen months to complete, with the production experiencing a number of difficulties. Britain’s mandatory three-day work week and the unplugging of the National Grid during the coal shortages due to industrial unrest of the early 1970s did not delay filming as Pinewood had its own generators, but it affected film processing as the lab was an off-site contractor.[6]

Group Three’s commitment to its financial partner, RAI, to include Italian actors in the cast also had to be addressed. Originally, two supporting roles were intended for Italian actors; with the casting of Nick Tate and Zienia Merton in those roles, a solution had to be worked out. Four of the later episodes produced (“The Troubled Spirit“, “Space Brain“, “Dragon’s Domain” and “The Testament of Arkadia“) featured Italian guest artists.

The necessity to telex story outlines and scripts to New York for approval caused further production delays. The incessant re-writing this brought about eventually caused Christopher Penfold to resign during the shooting of “Space Brain“, after completing his writing commitment with the script “Dragon’s Domain“. In a later interview, Johnny Byrne stated that “one episode they (New York) would ask us to speed things up, forcing us to cut out character development; then the next episode, they asked for more character moments, which would slow down the action; then they would complain there weren’t enough pretty girls in another.”[7] Years later, Byrne and Penfold would agree that the process they worked under made “good scripts less than they had been” and forced them to waste time re-writing “bad scripts to make them acceptable”.[7] Byrne remained until the end of production; his last task writing filler scenes for the desperately short “The Last Enemy” and a re-shoot for the troublesome “Space Brain“. The scenes re-mounted for “The Last Enemy” concluded principal photography on 28 February 1975.

Countries where the show was popular include France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Poland, Ethiopia, South Africa, Turkey, Iran, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Peru, Japan, Malaysia, Canada, Mexico, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. One of the first previews of the series was in Australia on the Seven Network in July 1975, but the station later split the first series into two seasons. The second season was shown in 1979.

Reception[edit]

Response to the series varied; some critics praised it as a classic, citing the production values and multi-layered storytelling (“Space: 1999 is like Star Trek shot full of methedrine. It is the most flashy, gorgeous sci-fi trip ever to appear on TV…” and “Space: 1999 is a visually stunning, space-age morality play…”);[14][15] others panned it for poor plotting and wooden acting, especially on the part of Barbara Bain (“the plots and characterisation on Space: 1999 have been primitive…” and “A disappointing collage of wooden characters, boring dialogue and incomprehensible plots…”).[16][17]

Isaac Asimov criticised the scientific accuracy of the series by pointing out that any explosion capable of knocking the Moon out of its orbit would actually blow it apart, and even if it did leave orbit it would take thousands of years to reach the nearest star. He did, however, praise the programme for the accuracy of the representation of movement in the low gravity environment of the Moon, and for its realistic production design (Asimov’s responses were based on the pilot episode only). Subsequent episodes (such as “The Black Sun”, third in production order, and “Another Time, Another Place”, sixth in production order) suggest the Moon reaches the stars by passing through wormholes and hyperspatial tunnels, a plot point made more overt in second-season episodes, notably “The Taybor” and “Space Warp”.[18] This issue is left somewhat enigmatic in the first season as episodes involving other planets invariably begin with the Moon having already reached a planet and in the first few episodes of this kind, such as “Matter of Life and Death” and “Missing Link”, the episodes actually begin with the Alphans on their way back from a planet, an initial Eagle flight having taken place before the episode even begins.

Gerry and Sylvia Anderson were surprised and disappointed that the public (and critics) never granted them the suspension of disbelief given to other science-fiction programmes.[19] The characters seem aware of the apparent implausibility of their situation. In “Black Sun”, Victor Bergman asserts the chances of their surviving the explosion which knocked them from orbit are “just about infinite.” In “Matter of Life and Death”, Koenig remarks “many things have happened since we broke away from our own solar system, unexplainable things.” How they survived and are able to travel the Universe seems to be a central mystery to which the Alphans, and the audience, have no concrete answers.

In speaking about the show in 2010, Bain reflected: “We had some very good science fiction people as advisors who knew what they were talking about. For instance, they knew that sound up there wouldn’t travel, and it would just be quiet up there. But then we wouldn’t have a series, so we couldn’t do that. There were various considerations that had to be made, but they were based on what is, or what was, known at the time. For all I know now it’s out of date. I don’t really know.” [20]

She added that some of the technology on Space: 1999 has come to pass: “We made up a scanning device for Dr Russell. Someone would simply be lying on the floor half dead, and I would [scan them] with this funny little thing that was a prop. I could read all his vital signs. They can pretty much do that [with a medical device] nowadays. There were times that we were playing with props that didn’t read anything — I just had a bunch of dialogue to say after. We had the Commlock. All of those things were on the verge of happening anyway. Now we’re way past it. When we made it, 1999 seemed so far away.” [20]

Cancellation and revival[edit]

Following the completion of the first series, the production team prepared for a second series to commence production in the autumn of 1975. Gerry Anderson had staff writer Johnny Byrne prepare a critical analysis of the first twenty-four episodes, assessing their strengths and weaknesses in order to mount a new and improved second year.[7] Byrne then commenced writing scripts in an improved first-series format: “The Biological Soul”, “The Face of Eden”, and “Children of the Gods”. He engaged British writer Donald James to develop his first-series format story “The Exiles”.

The largest stumbling block for the staff had been having all material vetted by ITC’s New York office. ITC’s compromise was to hire a high-profile American staff writer-producer. At this time, Sylvia Anderson left her role as producer when she and Gerry Anderson formally separated (and subsequently divorced). Fred Freiberger, whom Gerry Anderson had considered for the writing position, was then brought on board to help guide the series as a producer and acted as show-runner. Freiberger had produced the third and final season of Star Trek in 1968–1969 and eight episodes of the first season of The Wild Wild West (including one in which Martin Landau guest-starred) before being dismissed. Immediately after Space: 1999he would go on to produce what would be the final season of The Six Million Dollar Man. His writing credits included Slattery’s PeopleThe Iron HorseAll in the FamilyPetrocelli, and Starsky and Hutch. Though Anderson and Grade were satisfied with this choice, Abe Mandell had concerns about why he was unemployed and available at the time.[6]

Then ITC Entertainment President Sir Lew Grade abruptly cancelled the series’ production in late 1975, when ratings in the United States had dropped during the later autumn months of the year. Grade had already been disappointed by the lack of an American network broadcast sale. Gerry Anderson and Fred Freiberger rallied and pitched the idea of a new series with the addition of an alien character to Moonbase Alpha, who would shake up the dynamic of interaction on the Moonbase and regain viewer interest in the United States. On the strength of Anderson and Freiberger’s proposal of adding an alien character from the planet Psychon named Maya, Mandell approved a renewal of the series for a second year.

In addition to the alien Maya character, to be played by Catherine Schell, numerous other changes were made for what was branded Year Two. The most visible change was the absence of Professor Bergman (Barry Morse). Morse’s departure was due to a salary dispute, but he later claimed that he was glad to leave, and he had told Anderson: “I would rather play with grown-ups for a while.” [21] With Morse gone, the role of the boffin on Alpha was filled completely by Maya, whose people’s science was far in advance of mankind’s. Also, her character was conceived to be able to provide “outside observation of human behaviour” as had been provided by the character of Mr. Spock on Star Trek. Maya shared Spock’s logical approach to problem-solving and advanced intelligence, but differed in that she was a charming, fully emotional person. Most importantly, however, her Psychon abilities as a metamorph with the power of “molecular transformation” allowed her to convert herself into any living thing for an hour at a time, were designed to add a certain “wow” factor to the newly revamped series. Maya had an impish sense of humour. When love-interest Tony Verdeschi offered her some of his home-brewed beer, Maya tried it, then turned herself into Mister Hyde. Schell had previously guest-starred as the Servant of the Guardian in the Year One episode “Guardian of Piri“.

In addition to the cosmetic changes, the characters were “warmed up.” Koenig and Russell went from a barely noticeable courtship to a physically passionate, full-fledged romance, in which the devotion ran so deep that they offered to die for each other (“Brian the Brain”). In addition to Bergman, Year One supporting characters Paul Morrow (Prentis Hancock), David Kano (Clifton Jones) and Tanya Alexander (Suzanne Roquette) were also removed from the cast (Paul and Tanya’s disappearance is explained in the Powys Media book The Forsaken by John Kenneth Muir). Dr Bob Mathias (Anton Phillips) was present in the first two Year Two episodes, was mentioned in the third episode, and then also disappeared without a trace. His character was replaced by several recurring physicians. Alan Carter (Nick Tate) was to have been written out of the series, but he had become so popular with fans that he remained. Sandra Benes (Zienia Merton) remained with the series in an on-again off-again association, but the character only appeared in a fraction of the episodes, albeit more prominently in some than in many of those of the first series.

New characters Maya (an alien from the planet Psychon) and Security Chief Tony Verdeschi join Year Two

Security Chief Tony Verdeschi also joined as a new character, played by Tony Anholt. Verdeschi, who assumed the base’s second-in-command role, neither appeared, nor was ever mentioned, in Year One. However, Moonbase Alpha personnel treated Verdeschi as if he had been in their midst since “Breakaway”. His character was designed to serve primarily as a secondary male action hero, and became a romantic interest for Maya.

No on-screen explanations were offered for the cast changes. One scene in “The Metamorph” mentioning Bergman’s death was scripted and filmed, but cut from the final edit. The Moonbase Alpha Technical Manualproduced by Starlog magazine picks up this explanation, stating Bergman died due to a faulty spacesuit per the scripted scene. Likewise, it was mentioned in this publication that Morrow and Kano had died in an Eagle crash between seasons, and explained that Dr Mathias, supposedly Alpha’s psychiatrist (although he seems to be more Russell’s assistant) was on sabbatical doing research. Fred Freiberger felt that these characters were one-dimensional and had no fan support; he told Nick Tate that the audience would not remember them and that, as far as he was concerned, they were just “somewhere else” on Alpha, lost in the crowd of three hundred other people.[6] Freiberger failed to appreciate the value of the supporting characters to the show and its fans.

Other changes included the main titles and theme music. Year One’s opening montage of events from “Breakaway” and the episode about to unfold was dropped in favour of a special-effects sequence depicting the Moon being blown out of orbit into space. With Morse gone, Schell was featured in his place as a regular alongside Landau and Bain, and all three were depicted in action-oriented images as opposed to the mannequin-like stances Landau and Bain had assumed in the Year One main titles. New series composer Derek Wadsworth‘s new theme dropped Barry Gray‘s alternation between stately, orchestral passages and funky rhythmic ones in favour of a more consistently contemporary piece.

Rudi Gernreich‘s minimalist costume was considerably modified from the original unisex design to include an optional skirt and leather boots for women and much more detail work on the tunic portion, including turtleneck collars, coloured stitching, patches and photo ID badges. In addition, colourful jackets (generally red, blue or green) became part of most characters’ ensembles.

The expansive Main Mission set, with its balcony and windows revealing the lunar surface, was replaced by a more compact Command Centre, supposedly deep underground (again, this change was explained in the Year Two Writers’ Bible and Technical Manual as necessary for security, but never explained onscreen). Medical Centre, Generator Section, Life Support and the Alphans’ living quarters became smaller, while the interior of the Eagle command module was updated with additional buttons, flashing lights and television monitors, while the Eagle also lost a section of corridor (the galley/storage area) between the passenger module and the cockpit. (This was to accommodate its placement on Pinewood Soundstage “L”, with the other standing Alpha sets; the Eagle was permanently affixed to the boarding tube/travel tube set and jammed between the travel-tube reception area and the Medical Centre.)[9]

The sombre mood created in Year One by the effective use of light and shadow in the filming of Moonbase Alpha interiors was abandoned in favour of a generally brighter cinematography, and even the lettering used in signage and costuming—most noticeable on spacesuits and Eagle Transporter doors—changed to a simpler, less futuristic style.

Production Designer Keith Wilson stated in an interview in Destination: Moonbase Alpha that he was always being ordered by Producer Fred Freiberger to make sets smaller, taking away the expansive (and expensive) look of the first series’ interiors. Freiberger was very budget-conscious and, despite press releases to the contrary, the production team was working with less money this series.[6][7][22] If there had been a budget increase, the ‘stagflation‘ economy of the seventies would have cancelled it out. When interviewed, many of the actors state they were asked to accept less money, including Landau and Bain (who were the only ones with enough clout to be able to refuse).

Freiberger emphasised action-adventure in Year Two stories to the exclusion of metaphysical themes explored in Year One. Of Year One, he commented, “They were doing the show as an English show, where there was no story, with the people standing around and talking. In the first show I did, I stressed action as well as character development, along with strong story content, to prove that 1999 could stand up to the American concept of what an action-adventure show should be.”[23] Since Year One was quite serious in tone, one of Freiberger’s ways to accomplish this objective was to inject humour into Year Two stories whenever possible, but much of it seemed to the more vocal fans to be forced, especially at the conclusion of an episode, where the Alphans were seen as jovial and light-hearted despite whatever violent or tragic events might have previously befallen them. Freiberger had appropriated this approach from Star Trek; the endings of many of that show’s episodes featured an upbeat discussion among the cast of the lessons learned during the episode and closing on a joke; this approach was copied for Space: 1999 with Koenig, Verdeschi, Russell, Carter and Maya enjoying a laugh in the Command Centre. Given Landau’s intensity and the brooding nature of the Koenig character, the approach did not fit the series.

Members of the Space: 1999 cast were disenchanted with the scripts. Martin Landau: “They changed it because a bunch of American minds got into the act and they decided to do many things they felt were commercial. Fred Freiberger helped in some respects, but, overall, I don’t think he helped the show, I think he brought a much more ordinary, mundane approach to the series.”[24] One particular episode (‘All That Glisters‘, which dealt with the threat of an intelligent rock) was of such allegedly deficient quality that it sparked a confrontation between Freiberger and the cast. Landau disliked the story so strongly that he wrote the following notes on his copy of the script: “All the credibility we’re building up is totally forsaken in this script.”; “…Story is told poorly.”; and “The character of Koenig takes a terrible beating in this script — We’re all schmucks.” Anholt revealed that, “the more the cast complained about a script’s flaws, the more intractable and unyielding Freiberger became.” Dissatisfaction on Landau’s part about scripts was not new to Year Two, though. Sylvia Anderson remembers that he often voiced criticisms of scripts during production of the first series.

Series Two[edit]

With the last-minute renewal from Grade, the production team hit the ground running. Byrne’s script “The Biological Soul”, involving the Alphans’ encounter with the unstable Mentor of the planet Psychon and his biological computer Psyche, which drew sustenance from the mental energy of intelligent beings, was re-written to include the new character Maya and the rest of the format changes. Production began on 26 January 1976 and was scheduled to last a mere ten months due to the already-late renewal order.

To fulfil the scheduling requirement, Freiberger came up with the “double-up script” solution. During “double-up” instalments, two first-unit production teams would film two episodes simultaneously. Landau and some of the supporting cast would be given expanded roles and would film an episode on location or on sets constructed for that story in Pinewood’s Soundstage “M”, while Bain and the remaining supporting cast (also in expanded roles) would film their episode in the standing Alpha sets on Soundstage “L”. Landau and Bain would then be given minor roles in the opposing episodes. This cost- and time-saving measure was used to complete eight stories as four pairs: “The Rules of Luton” and “The Mark of Archanon“; “The AB Chrysalis” and “Catacombs of the Moon“; “A Matter of Balance” and “Space Warp“; “Devil’s Planet” and “Dorzak“. A ninth episode, “The Beta Cloud“, was intentionally scripted with only one day’s worth of work for Landau and Bain to allow their planned holiday to the French Riviera not to delay the series’ production; the four supporting cast members (Schell, Anholt, Tate and Merton) were the recipients of much greater than usual exposure.

Relations between new producer Freiberger and the Year One veterans were strained. Landau complained about stories he felt were light-weight or absurd when compared to the previous year’s efforts. He wrote on the cover of a script: “I’m not going out on a limb for this show because I’m not in accord with what you’re (Freiberger) doing as a result … etc. I don’t think I even want to do the promos—I don’t want to push the show any more as I have in the past. It’s not my idea of what the show should be. It’s embarrassing to me if I am not the star of it and in the way I feel it should be. This year should be more important to it, not less important to it … I might as well work less hard in all of them.”[25] Johnny Byrne said that Freiberger was a good man and good producer, but not good for Space: 1999. He had gotten them a second year after the cancellation, but the changes he made did not benefit the programme.[25]

Principal photography came to an end on 23 December 1976 with “The Dorcons“. An article regarding a third series was printed in the trade papers: “Now entrenched in its successful second season boom, ITC is looking forward to a third season with more fantastic events and additions, although mum’s the word at the studio. They will only say that Maya and Miss Schell will be kept in and that the budget may be raised again, but that’s all until final preparations and an official announcement are made.”[6]

Undeveloped Year Three[edit]

The producers and studio intended to continue the show with a third season. This was to be shorter than the previous two, with 13 episodes, for budget reasons. Maya was considered to be a successful character, and the producers began grooming her for a spinoff show that would run concurrently with the third series of Space: 1999. Had this project gone ahead, Maya would have been absent from Space: 1999. The “Maya” series was also intended to run for 13 episodes a year.[6]

As filming on Year Two came to its conclusion, it became apparent that there would be no third season, and the series ended with the episode “The Dorcons“.

Broadcast[edit]

UK[edit]

The series premiered in September 1975, on the ITV network but was not simulcast nationally (this remained the case until a repeat airing on BBC2in 1998). Most ITV regions (including YorkshireGrampianUlsterScottishBorderATV, and Tyne Tees) premiered the series on Thursday, 4 September 1975 in a 7.00pm slot.[26] The London and Anglia regions screened the first episode two days later on Saturday, 6 September at 5.50pm.[27] The Granada region began showing the series on Friday, 26 September 1975, initially at 7.35pm before moving to 6.35pm a few weeks later.[28] The HTV region did not begin showing the series until October 1975, again in an early Friday evening slot. However, within a few weeks, various stations had moved the series elsewhere in their schedules.

The second series premiered on London Weekend Television (LWT) in a non-prime-time slot on Saturday 4 September 1976 at 11.30am, with ATVfollowing on just a few hours later at 5.40pm. GranadaWestward and Ulster started to screen the series in early 1977, Grampian, and Tyne Tees did not screen the series until later in the year. Scottish started to screen the series on 9 April 1978 on Sunday afternoons. HTV did not pick the series up until 1984 and then only showed nineteen out of the twenty-four episodes from Year Two (the last episodes were not screened in Wales until the series was repeated in the 1990s). Southern Television was the other ITV region known not to have broadcast series two. Even its successor broadcaster, Television South, failed to screen any series two episodes when Space: 1999 was reshown in various other ITV regions between 1982 and 1985.

US[edit]

In the United States, efforts to sell the series to one of the three networks for the 1974–75 or 1975–76 television seasons failed. The networks were uninterested in a project over which they had no creative control, being presented with the accomplished fact of twenty-four completed episodes. Abe Mandell of ITC had secured a ‘handshake’ agreement with a network executive in 1974, but after the man’s termination, all his projects were abandoned.[6] Undaunted, Mandell created what he called his own Space: 1999 Network[7] and sold the completed program into first-run syndicationdirectly to local stations. Much of the publicity mentioned the then-staggering three million pound budget: as a part of the American promotion effort, a glossy magazine-sized brochure was produced, touting Space: 1999 as the Six-and-a-Half Million Dollar Series (an allusion to the then-popular American programme The Six Million Dollar Man) featuring American stars, American writers and American directors.[29]

In the months leading to the beginning of the fall (autumn) 1975 television season Landau and Bain participated in special preview screenings in select cities.[3] Landau is said to have personally contacted editors of the widely read and influential TV Guide magazine in some markets to secure coverage of Space: 1999 in its pages upon learning of ITC’s somewhat poor promotional efforts.

While most of the U.S. stations that aired Space: 1999 were independent (such as powerful Chicago station WGN-TVLouisville station WDRB-TV, Los Angeles station KHJ-TV, and New York City’s WPIX-TV), a handful were affiliated with the major networks (such as Charlotte, North Carolina’s WSOC-TV, at the time a strong NBC affiliate, and Fresno’s KFSN-TV, at the time a CBS affiliate) and sometimes pre-empted regular network programming to show episodes of the series. Most U.S. stations broadcast episodes in the weekday evening hour just before prime time or on weekends.

Canada[edit]

In Canada, CBC Television was the broadcaster of Space: 1999 from 1975 into the 1980s. The first season in 1975–76 was shown regionally on some CBC owned-and-operated stations, the airtime varying. With the start of the second season in September 1976, CBC Television upgraded Space: 1999 to full-network status, airing it Saturdays on all CBC owned-and-operated stations, with affiliated, privately owned stations also offering the show on Saturdays. Most of the country saw Space: 1999 at 5 p.m. on Saturdays, a notable exception being the Atlantic Provinces in which it was broadcast at 6 or 6:30 p.m. (their time) or – as was the case in the summers – sometime earlier in the afternoon to accommodate live sports coverage, the airing of which crossed into or totally over the usual Space: 1999 airtime. After the 1976–77 broadcast year (in which second-season episodes were run and rerun), the show’s ratings were sufficiently high for CBC Television to give the first season a full-network airing – and with further repeats – from 1977 to 1978. The French-language CBC Television, Radio-Canada, showed Cosmos: 1999 several times (both seasons) between 1975 and 1980, first on Mondays (1975–1976), then on Saturdays (1976–1977), then on Mondays (1979), and finally on Wednesdays (1979–1980).

The series fared admirably on CBC Television in Canada, airing in English in a family viewing period, late Saturday afternoons before hockeybroadcasts, with a mostly un-disrupted run and rerun of all 24 episodes from September, 1976 through September, 1977. The French version was also broadcast, in early evening on Saturdays. Ratings were sufficient for a full additional year’s transmission of Year One in the English CBC Saturday programming slot in 1977 and 1978. Episodes of both Year One and Year Two were repeated regionally in Canada in English and French through the early-to-mid-1980s. YTV Canada broadcast both seasons with reportedly good ratings from 1990 to 1992, in a late Saturday afternoon airtime closely matching that of the CBC English network in the 1970s.

The full-network English CBC airing began with the series opener, “Breakaway“, on 11 September 1976, then “The Metamorph“, the Year Two opener, on 18 September. “The Exiles“, “Journey to Where“, “The Taybor“, and “New Adam, New Eve” followed respectively in the subsequent weeks. Next were “The Mark of Archanon“, “Brian the Brain“, “The Rules of Luton“, “The AB Chrysalis“, “Catacombs of the Moon“, and “Seed of Destruction“. “Seed of Destruction” aired on 27 November, and then with December there came a month of repeats. And after a pre-emption for New Year’s Day sports, new episodes resumed airing on 8 January 1977 with “A Matter of Balance“, followed by “The Beta Cloud“, “One Moment of Humanity“, “The Lambda Factor“, “All That Glisters“, and “The Seance Spectre“. The two-part episode, “The Bringers of Wonder”, was shown on 19 and 26 February. And then “Dorzak“, “The Immunity Syndrome“, “Devil’s Planet“, and “The Dorcons” followed in March. “Space Warp” would not be shown until 21 May, after many weeks of repeats. By 10 September 1977, except for “The Exiles”, all of the second-season episodes had been repeated. And thereafter, a 1977–1978 run of first-season episodes began with “War Games” on 17 September.

Finland[edit]

In Finland the first season was originally aired by the commercial MTV (Mainostelevisio) channel in 1976, but it was withdrawn after couple of episodes on demand of the national programme board as the show was considered too brutal and horrifying. The same thing happened when MTV tried to air the second season in 1978.

The complete show wasn’t seen in Finland until 1996-1997 when a small local channel, TV-Tampere, aired it. Since then it aired on TVTV! in 2000 and 2001, and later on MTV3 Scifi in 2008.

Romania[edit]

In Romania, the series has been shown on Prima TV.

Elsewhere[edit]

It was shown in Italy as Spazio 1999 , Argentina, Uruguay, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, francophone Canada, and France as Cosmos: 1999, Denmark as Månebase Alpha, Brazil and Portugal as Espaço: 1999, Germany as Mondbasis Alpha 1, Sweden as Månbas Alpha, Poland as Kosmos 1999 (1977–1979), Finland as Avaruusasema Alfa, Greece as Διάστημα 1999, Hungary as Alfa Holdbázis, Spain, Chile, Venezuela, and Colombia as Espacio: 1999, Mexico as Odisea 1999, Iran as 1999 سال , Turkey as Uzay 1999 and South Africa as Alpha 1999(1976, dubbed into Afrikaans). The series was also broadcast in New Zealand and Australia.

Fan and critic responses to the new series varied. Some missed the mystical plotlines, feature-film ambiance and the “British-ness” of the first series. Others said they enjoyed the new characters, down-to-earth characterisations and action. Comparisons with Star Trek were used by both camps to show how the series had been either saved or destroyed by the format change. Reviewing the show as a whole, science fiction historian John Clutedescribed Space: 1999 as “visually splendid” but criticised what he regarded as the show’s “mediocre acting” and “rotten scripts”.[30]

Message From Moonbase Alpha and planned revivals[edit]

Message From Moonbase Alpha (premiered 13 September 1999), starring Zienia Merton as Sandra Benes.

Filmed on 29 August 1999, Message From Moonbase Alpha is a fan-produced mini-episode made with the co-operation and involvement of Space: 1999 script editor Johnny Byrne, who penned the script. Filmed inside a private house on a remarkable working replica of a small section of the Main Mission set and utilising the original prop of Koenig’s Command Centre desk and Sandra Benes‘s original Year Two Alpha uniform, the short film was first shown at the Space: 1999 Breakaway Convention[31] in Los Angeles, California on 13 September 1999—the day the events in episode 1 of the series were supposed to take place. With the permission of (then) copyright owners Carlton Media International, the film included brief clips from seven episodes to illustrate the deserted Moonbase Alpha and the Alphans’ exodus to planet Terra Alpha. Previously unused footage shot for the Year Two title sequence and The Last Enemy was used to create a sequence showing the Moon being affected by a gravitational disturbance and thrown into an unknown solar system. Short excerpts from 12 other episodes appeared in a montage as Sandra Benes recalls her life on Alpha.

The seven-minute film features Zienia Merton reprising her role as Sandra Benes delivering a final message to Earth as the only crew member left on Moonbase Alpha while a massive exodus to a habitable planet, Terra Alpha, takes place with the rest of the crew. The evacuation was also necessitated by the degradation and decay of Alpha’s life support systems. This basically gave the series the conclusion that it never had in its initial run. Taking place twenty five years after the events of “Breakaway”, Commander Koenig and Maya are mentioned during Sandra’s message. It concludes with the termination of the message as Sandra closes down Alpha’s operational systems and transmits the message- which turns out to be the mysterious signal received shortly before the events of “Breakaway”.

Modified versions of Message From Moonbase Alpha are available on the Space: 1999 Bonus Disk in the U.S. and Canada, and on a DVD bonus disc in France and in Italy. The original version appears as a bonus feature on the Space: 1999/UFO – The Documentaries DVD produced by Fanderson.

Around the same time ‘Message From Moonbase Alpha’ was being filmed, Johnny Byrne and Christopher Penfold attempted to revive the franchise as a movie series, similar to the way Star Trek had been revived cinematically in the late 1970s. The first film would have picked up the story several years after the series ended, and would have featured a heavily redesigned Moonbase Alpha. Ultimately the project failed, and nothing came of it.[32]

In February 2012, ITV Studios America and HDFILMS officially announced their intention to produce a reimagining of Space: 1999, to be titled Space: 2099, however no serious effort was made to develop the series any further beyond the concept stage. [33]

Home video releases[edit]

UK[edit]

The series was released on home video in the 1990s, with each cassette (or “volume”) featuring two episodes. In 2001, it was released on DVD in the UK by Carlton Media, both in single disc volumes (each volume contained four episodes) and also as two complete season boxed sets (titled as “Year One” and “Year Two”) comprising six discs each. Each DVD also contained various extra features, including a variety of archive production material, memorabilia, and interviews with the cast and crew from the time the series was being made.

In 2005, Network DVD re-issued Year One in the UK as a Special Edition seven-disc box set. For this release, to coincide with the series’ 30th Anniversary, each episode was digitally restored by creating new 35 mm film elements (a new interpositive made from the original negative which is then used to make further copies). High Definition digital transfers were then made from the interpositives using a state-of-the-art Philips Spirit DataCine. This vastly improved the picture quality in comparison to the previous DVD releases, however the restoration process has actually made some of the space scenes (that involve special effects and model work) less realistic due to increased brightness and contrast (a comparison can be viewed here [34]). This box set also included two booklets and a new set of extra features that were not on the Carlton DVD releases, including featurettes on “Concept & Creation” and “Special Effects & Design” (edited from an earlier “Fanderson” documentary made in 1996), textless and alternative opening and closing title sequences, a two-part Clapperboard special on Gerry Anderson from 1975, and also a brand new 70-minute documentary entitled “These Episodes” in which Anderson, Christopher Penfold, Johnny Byrne, Zienia Merton and David Lane reflect on the making of key episodes from the first series.

Network DVD released Year One on Blu-ray in the UK on 1 November 2010, and simultaneously re-released their Special Edition DVD box set of Year One with new cover artwork at the same time.[35] The Blu-ray set includes all of the extras on the 2005 Network DVD release as well as some of the extras that were on the 2001 Carlton DVD release (including a Lyons Maid ice-lolly commercial, and an SFX segment from the British documentary series Horizon). It also includes several new extras including a “Memories of Space” featurette, a Sylvia Anderson interview (in which she frankly discusses the series and her thoughts about Landau and Bain), an expanded version of the “These Episodes” documentary from the DVD set, several PDF files containing scripts and annuals, an extensive set of photo galleries with hundreds of stills, and the first episode of Year Two, “The Metamorph”, in digitally restored hi-definition.

Network DVD began a similar restoration process for Year Two in 2007, however progress was slow due to higher production costs in comparison to remastering Year One (the audio for Year One was already digitised prior to Network’s restoration, but Year Two was not). In late 2014, Network finally announced that Year Two would be released in 2015. As part of this announcement, Network released a limited edition (of 1999 copies) of a special preview disc of the two-part story “The Bringers of Wonder” on 8 December 2014. This release also contains a restored version of the feature length Destination: Moonbase Alpha film.[36] The remastered Year Two was eventually released on Blu-ray and DVD in September 2015, to coincide with the series’ 40th Anniversary.[37] Again containing a wealth of extra features, the sets include galleries, vintage interviews, a blooper, behind the scenes footage, original source audio recordings, scripts and annuals PDF files, a stock footage archive, a textless opening title sequence, trailers and promos, “music only” options for all episodes, a stop-motion fan film from 1979, and a specially re-edited/rescored version of the episode “Seed of Destruction” as if it were made for Year One.

United States[edit]

A&E Home Video has released the entire series on DVD in Region 1. It was initially released in 8 sets with 6 episodes each in 2001 and 2002. On 24 September 2002, a 16-disc “Mega Set” box set featuring all 48 complete, uncut, digitally remastered and restored original broadcast episodes of the series was released. On 31 July 2007, A&E released Space: 1999 – Complete Series, 30th Anniversary Edition. This is essentially the same as the 2002 “mega set” release (and does not use the 2005 hi-def remasters), but does includes a special bonus disc full of extra features.[38] Year One was released on Blu-ray in the U.S. on 2 November 2010 by A&E Home Entertainment.[39]

Other media[edit]

The series has been translated into other media. Originally, all the episodes had been adapted in novelisations, except, for some reason, “Earthbound” (though this may be because E.C. Tubb was working from a different script of “Breakaway” in which Commissioner Simmons was killed when the Moon was torn out of Earth orbit) and “The Taybor” (from Year Two). The authors of these works wrote a number of original stories and have since written new stories and novels which were published after 1999. As well, the original authors participated in the revised versions of their original novels.

At the time of the series’ original run, several comic book series were published and, in the US, a series of audio adaptations were recorded on record albums with the younger audience in mind. After 1999, many of these original comic book stories were revised and reprinted along with new stories. See the list above.

Mattel created a line of Space: 1999 toys to tie into the TV series, including the Eagle 1 Spaceship. Released in 1976, the Eagle 1 is over 2.5-feet long and a foot wide. The Eagle 1 is made mostly of molded plastic and has a number of parts and accessories.[40]

Corporate Video Production: A Promo Video Guide

swiped from:

http://www.geardads.com/corporate-video-production-promo-video-guide/

 

Corporate Video Production: A Promo Video Guide

How many times have you heard someone say, “Well I currently pay the bills with corporate video production, but I wish I could get into more artistic, creative, or personally satisfying type of filmmaking.”

There is definitely something cold and emotionless about the word “corporate.” It makes the world of corporate video production seem heartless – motivated by profit and returns rather than genuine video storytelling.

So for someone just getting started in video production, it’s natural to assume the world of corporate filmmaking is a desolate pit of unhappy sell outs who wouldn’t wish their career on any talented up and comers.

Corporate Video Production: Promo Video Guide

The truth is, shooting corporate video is the most plausible way to make a living from video production. But it doesn’t have to be all about the money part. Actually, we find it to be incredibly gratifying, perhaps even more so than documentary filmmaking. Why?

Because in corporate video, you set all the rules. The kinds of videos you want to make, within an industry or line of business that you’re interested in, and using the video production equipment that you enjoy using.

So when someone says they’re dissatisfied with their current work in corporate video, it’s most likely because they have fallen into a spiral of making videos that they find more and more boring, for clients who are harder to work with, and using equipment that makes the whole process frustrating. No wonder the freedom of creative commercial production, or traveling documentary work, or even fictional narrative films seem all the more exciting than corporate video.

When we make the initial phone call, we don’t begin the conversation with, “What are you hoping to achieve with this video?” That question is useless, and we’re not sure why anyone asks that. The answer is they want a cool promo video that they can use in some way or another to help their cause. What other reason is there?

Video Production Services: Eliminating the Mystery

The aim of this article is to present a way to make an independent living producing amazing corporate videos, and the methodology and philosophy that makes it profitable.

You may notice that the gear recommendations further down in this article have some inherent similarities to our comprehensive documentary filmmaking article, partly because we produce videos in both documentary and commercial worlds, and so some of our gear and strategies are applied to both types of work.

But where documentary production depends on capturing the most amount of footage as possible using the most efficient equipment available, corporate video depends on knowing precisely what you want to shoot before the day of production, and using gear that gives you world class results without requiring major crews and budgets.

Videography or Documentary or Promo Video?

First, let’s do a quick summary of what a contemporary corporate video is and what it isn’t. At a basic level, it’s a video made for a business of any size, for the purposes of either external promotion, or internal communication or training.

The videos can be any length, featuring any form of information expression, such as an on-screen subject delivering a scripted message, an interview-driven story, text presentation on the screen, or a Voice of God narrator. The visuals can be a series of A-roll and B-roll sequences of your subjects, along with possible animation or graphics, or even scripted or acted visuals that help to convey the message.

So is it like a commercial? Well, yes and no. Creative advertising doesn’t really fit under the umbrella of corporate video production. If you want to get into 30 second TV commercials or short-form creative videos sponsored by major brands, starting your own corporate video production business may not be the best approach. Typically commercials are produced by agencies who put together a team of creatives, technical crew, and specialists such as camera operators or a Director of Photography.

Promo Video Commercial Shoot

Sometimes your corporate video productions resemble commercials more than documentaries

You may very likely produce a commercial – possibly even an exceptionally creative one – for some of your corporate clients. Or your business might get hired by an agency to serve one of the specialist roles on a commercial production. But for work where you produce, shoot, and edit your client’s promo video, often the video style will be a little more down to earth than a Superbowl ad.

So is it like a documentary then? The style of production and shooting can definitely resemble a documentary, in that there are still real people involved, and you still have to hustle to frame and capture shots on the fly, as well as interview or script your A-roll narration. But the objective and approach is a lot less journalistic than a documentary. Your job is to promote a business to the outside world, or help explain a certain part of the business’s story to an internal audience, using whatever means that make sense, such as feeding lines to your interview subject or having employees act a scene out.

If it’s promotional in nature, then do nonprofits, churches, or schools fall under the banner of corporate video production? Here’s where we think the term “corporate video” begins to confuse people, and where “promotional video” or “promo video” should really be used in its place. Yes, all of the above can be thought of as corporate videos. Even a Kickstarter campaign falls under this category. Or a behind-the-scenes video telling the story of how a fictional feature film was made.

Corporate video production pretty much spans the widest gamut of video styles on the planet. It includes lecture recordings and event videography, Powerpoint-driven instructional video, highly technical industry work, equipment demonstrations, you name it.

So it’s true, a large part of what we call corporate video production could very well be something you personally are not that into.

the gear dads definition of corporate video

For our corporate video production company, we define the kind of promo video we regularly produce as follows:

A corporate or promo video is at its core a documentary style production, with interviews providing the narration and B-roll of subjects performing related actions, but with careful planning and deliberate video execution, and with the promotional message guiding all the decision making.

You get hired based on the work you’ve already done. So if the last few videos you made were all hour-long boring presentations for a company that makes plastic widgets, then most likely you’re known for the person who makes that kind of video and you’ll get hired to do it again. If you are interested in that kind of niche video production, then your video production company is going to be wildly successful because there probably aren’t many other video producers specializing in your niche.

If, however, you want your video production company to have a more broader appeal, and you want to make videos that are inspirational, authentic, and genuinely tell the story of a business, group, or individual, then make that the kind of video you’re known for making. And you’ll start to get hired to make more of them.

And if someone still comes along and asks you to make a dry, half hour widget demonstration, maybe you politely decline, or maybe you take that job anyway to pay today’s bills, and you make it the most engaging, inspirational half hour demonstration of widget technology you can. Because at the heart of every video there are still people, and people are always interesting, and good video production can make people a lot more interesting.

Corporate Video Production Niche Industry

In summary, you choose the kind of corporate or promo video you want to make a living producing. And with that kind of control, your video production business becomes an extension of your personal creative desires and filmmaking interests.

Video Production Services: Eliminating the Mystery

How do you actually make a sustainable living with corporate video production? The first few years follows a very simple circle of growth.

corporate video production business growth

You work on making more videos faster, while steadily increasing the quality of your output, so you can demand higher prices, which help you buy better gear, which allows you to make more videos even more efficiently, while also giving you more quality results. Rinse, lather, repeat.

How do you get to a point where you can make more videos and quicker, without sacrificing quality? You have to be able to transform something that is inherently creative, subjective, and to most people a totally mysterious process, into a well-oiled operation that has predictable schedules with guaranteed results.

Essentially you have to remove the big question marks out of the process of filmmaking. What is this even going to be, or look like? What’s the story? Who is talking? What are the visuals? How long will it take? How much will it cost?

You have to be an expert in knowing exactly how to make a certain type of promo video, time and time again, with predictability, even though the client, subjects, location and message will never be identical.

99% of corporate video clients have no idea how a video is made. They might have seen a video that they liked, or maybe they’ve hired someone to make a video for them in the past, but they are not experts in the art and science of video production. To them, it’s mostly a big question mark, but do you think anyone will admit they’re clueless about what a video is or how much it costs when they contact you for a quote?

Of course not. Most likely they’ll say they’re looking to make a certain type of video, with maybe one or two very specific details to guide the initial conversation (or to set themselves up as the person in charge), and then they’ll ask for an immediate quote.

From: Susan in Marketing

To: Nonprofit Video Production Services Inc.

Hi there, we’re looking to make a 7-10 minute video about our organization, to show at a fundraising event in 3 weeks. We have some photos already, and our CEO and board of directors can provide all the talking points. How much would that cost? Thanks!

For example, you might get a message that says, “Hi, we’re looking to make a 7-10 minute video about our organization, to show at a fundraising event in 3 weeks. We have some photos already, and our CEO and board of directors can provide all the talking points. How much would that cost? Thanks!”

Based on that amount of information, can you estimate the precise amount of time you’ll need to shoot, plus the number of hours you’ll need to edit, what video equipment you’ll use, what the story will look like, what visuals you’ll need, and how to ensure you quote a reasonable amount that will get you hired (but still make you a profit)?

If you’re at the receiving end of that email, and you can’t visualize exactly what the video could look like and what you would need to produce it . . or if any part of the filmmaking process is still a question mark for you . . . or if you go into this project assuming that the client knows more about how to produce a good video then you do, then this process is going to be a frustrating experience for either you or the client, or both.

We get this kind of request all the time, and while a follow up phone call is always encouraged, to get more details about the project before you spit out a number, we already know the cost and project details before we make the call.

For example, in this case we know that a 4-6 minute video is a lot more engaging to audiences than a 10 minute video (unless it’s a really kick ass 10 minute video, which might be hard to do in a 3 week turnaround).

And for a 4-6 minute video, we know that interviewing 3-4 subjects and weaving their interviews together makes for the most effective video and use of people’s times.

We also know that interviewing a volunteer, client, donor, or a low-on-the-totem-pole staff will always make for a more inspirational video than hearing the CEO or board of directors give their practiced marketing talking points. We’ll need one quiet location and about 4-5 hours for those interviews, and the rest of the time we’ll want to capture the 3 subjects in a variety of scenes for engaging and cinematic B-roll.

Our standard promo video

  • ​4-6 minutes long
  • 3-4 subjects interviewed
  • 6-12 sequences at different locations
  • 2 days to shoot with a crew of two
  • One week to edit

And finally, we know up front that it will take us two days to shoot, with two of us on crew, and about a week to edit. Our corporate video production kit is already packed with the video equipment we’ll use for this shoot.

When we make the initial phone call, we don’t begin the conversation with, “What are you hoping to achieve with this video?” That question is useless, and we’re not sure why anyone asks that. The answer is they want a cool promo video that they can use in some way or another to help their cause. What other reason is there?

We also don’t necessarily start with, “What is your budget?” As we explained above, we already know what it’ll cost for us to produce this video. And knowing exactly what it takes for us to do this kind of video, we also eliminate the whole mysterious question mark of pricing our videos.

Quick Tip: Eliminate the randomness or mystery behind your pricing. Set a general day or hourly rate, and create budgets according to your estimated shoot and edit times.

Your clients will appreciate the transparency and simplicity, rather than giving them zero information about cost breakdown, or worse yet, too much information with a line by line breakdown of all your expenses.

Our clients can see exactly what our breakdown of days to shoot and hours to edit are, so if their budget falls short of our fees, we can scale back the video to one shoot day, for example, and make a shorter video with less subjects and locations. If the client has a bigger budget and wants to spend more, we can modularly increase the shoot days and offer additional video production services, such as splitting the 4-6 minute video into three 2-minute profiles of each of the subjects, or creating a series of 30 second teasers for their social media campaign.

But the point is, we eliminate the mystery of video production, how it’s made, what it’ll look like, and how much it costs. And that way we make sure our videos are always as good or better than the last one we made.

Whereas if you assume the client knows more about how a good promo video is made, then you’ll very easily end up making a 10 minute boring CEO talking head video, with photos as your primary visuals, and it will have a lower budget (yet you’ll work even harder revising the video 20 times because nobody is that stoked about how it turned out). And then somebody will see the video at the fundraiser and they’ll hire you to do the same thing all over again.

How To Make A Corporate Video Shoot Go Well

Now that you’re set on making a certain kind of promo video – say, a 4-5 minute engaging business story that promotes a new product but with an emotional plea to the audience – how do you make sure you can actually achieve that on every shoot?

Just like knowing how to envision a video and its costs long before you take a job, being able to walk into any shoot with the confidence that you’ll get what you need – under any circumstance – is an essential skill.

You can look at each shoot as a variation of a formula. For example, you need an interview (or 2 or 3), at least three sequences per subject (preferably in 3 different locations or even within different areas of a house or building), and some time to shoot the product.

So when we start to plan our shoot, we know exactly the components that will make for a video shoot that we are confident we can edit into a great video.

Promo Video Production

In our phone call we’ll ask questions like:

  • Can you identify a few subjects who would be interested in telling their story about how the organization has impacted them?
  • Is there something happening in the next couple weeks that would make that particular day the best time for us to shoot?
  • What are some other things the subjects could be doing that we could capture?
  • Is there a place we can interview without distraction for a few hours? What does that place look like?
  • What are other areas in the building where we might shoot some action?

Whereas in a documentary you’re fairly limited to how much action you can act or recreate, in a promo video you can do whatever you and the client is comfortable with, as long as it’s actually helpful for the video. For example, if you’re shooting a wine maker, it’s perfectly acceptable to ask him or her to walk through the vineyard a few different times, pick up and taste the grapes, or do whatever is necessary to get the B-roll you need. In a documentary, on the other hand, sometimes you only get one shot at capturing those real life moments.

Promo Video Interview

So don’t be afraid to ask your subjects to repeat an action, or try it a different way. During an interview, you can ask a question a few times, maybe in different ways, in order to get what you need.

You can even tell the subject the kind of answer you’re shooting for, so they know what they should say (but in their own words).

In many ways, a promo video shoot can be a lot funner and simpler than a documentary, because the rules of production are less rigid, and you end up shooting only what you’ll need for the final video, rather than a large amount of throw away footage that may or may not be used.

But don’t forget you’re dealing with real people, most of whom have no experience appearing in a video. With a documentary, you can easily explain to your subject that their job is to simply go about their business, pretend like you’re not there, and you’ll aim to capture as much as you can around their schedule. And in the interview, their honest, unprepared answers are exactly what you’re looking for. All in all, it’s an arrangement that is easy to understand for the subject.

In a corporate shoot, however, the line becomes a lot fuzzier as to who is directing (you or the client), how much the subject should act or memorize a message, is the video about the business or about the person? It’s really easy to frustrate everybody very quickly.

Quick TipThe key to making authentic and compelling promo videos about regular people is to prevent them from freaking out.

Lights in their living room, a big camera on their face. “Do you have an extension cable around? Can you re-do that action again? Try to act natural.” 

Before you know it, they freeze up or become tired, and their interview and action sequences will be much less natural. 

Here’s our recommendation, based on many awkward experiences early in our careers. The way to ensure you get the best interview and B-roll, while providing your subject and client with a positive experience, is to not clue them into any of the problems and stresses running through your head. They’re paying you to figure everything out. And remember, they don’t know anything about how video production is done.

Once the subject feels the pressures of production, or becomes uncomfortable or overwhelmed – once they feel like they have to “perform” for a video rather than just be themselves – there’s not much you can do to save the video. It will be difficult to watch.

So avoid burdening your subject with the production details. Don’t ask them to stand in place for an hour while you fiddle with the lights.

Don’t tell them your microphone cable broke and you’re not sure what to do. They’ll wonder if they’re doing something wrong.

And if their interview is not going great, instead of telling them they’re doing terribly, make it your personal goal to figure out how to get better responses by asking the questions differently.

Corporate Video Production Interview

You’re doing great, Joe!

And if the interview location they selected is not great, you know how to quickly pivot and ask them to help you find another location. “Why, is there a problem?” they might ask. No, there’s just some air handling noise or lights in the first room that is a little off, so maybe we can find a slightly better place, it’s not a big deal.

Or if they don’t have any action they can perform, you have some suggestions already, like maybe walk somewhere, have a (slightly acted) conversation with a colleague, work on a computer, write some notes, drive a car – these are all action sequences that could fit in just about any promo video.

Essentially, your job is to make your subject and client feel like everything went really smoothly, rather than coming away with the perception that something was amiss. And then when you edit the project, no matter how difficult it is, you still want them to see the whole process as a cake walk.

In the end, the better you become at preproduction, day of production, and editing, the more your final videos will look like everything was super easy. And that’s the ultimate irony. Because the easier it looks, the more years of experience and talent it takes to achieve that level of production.

Case Study: A Bird Festival Promo Video That’s Not About Birds

Take a look at this video we produced a couple years ago:

The video is about an annual bird watching festival in remote Cordova, Alaska. Cordova is a small fishing town unreachable by roads, but for millions of migratory shorebirds, it is the most important rest area on their highway journey across the globe.

There are amazing nature filmmakers out there who could make a very good video about these magnificent shorebirds. But the city hired us because they know we make videos about the people, in a way that can engage even non bird enthusiasts. More importantly, they’ve hired us in the past and knew we could get this video done without creating additional work or stress for them, which is essential when so much is riding on a 4 day festival.

If you watch the video, you’ll see it’s not about the birds at all. It’s about people’s hopes and dreams, and about how the birds represent everyone who chooses to live in this tiny remote town. From the outside, it looks like a smooth production that reflects our current style of corporate videos. The video is under 6 minutes, it features 4 subjects telling their personal stories, and each story arc is both personal and also related to the overall cause.

If you were on the ground shooting, however, you would think the video was doomed.

When we flew in, we really didn’t have an idea of where we would be shooting or what the action sequences would be, apart from our subjects looking into binoculars, but hey, it’s Alaska, so there’s bound to be something spectacular. Unfortunately it rained the entire time we were there. There was literally nothing we could shoot that wasn’t out in the rain.

But we adapted, we quickly arranged a rough schedule for our subjects, we made on the spot interview locations work, we shot outside during the brief windows when it wasn’t pouring rain, and in the end we made an Emmy-nominated video that our client was thrilled with.

Promo Video Case Study Shooting in Water

Here’s the point: nobody, not the subjects, not the city, not the festival managers had any inclination that the production was challenging. We kept those pressures to ourselves.

And as a result, the city and nearby organizations have hired us to come back for a variety of other projects. Rain or shine.

Viral Video Production

At some point during your video production career, the question of “return on investment” will come up, especially if your core product is the promo video. And with any web video, the easiest metric in the world is the view count.

Are you promising results as part of your pitch? If so, you probably can’t predict if sales will rise or if the company brand will increase in value. But you do have some degree of control over how many people will see your video.

The question is, do you want viewcount to be an integral part of your video production business? Are you getting hired to produce a really good promo video, or are you getting hired to get audience engagement up in some way or another?

The truth is, no matter how great at video production you are, these kinds of documentary style promo videos aren’t ever going to reach platinum views. They’re not designed to maximize audience reach. In fact, just the opposite is true. These kinds of promo videos are meant to create an intimate, emotional connection with a viewer, and as a result, the perception of the business is positively impacted, one viewer at a time. That goes for any small or large corporation, nonprofit, individual or group who commissions a promo video.

Ideally, a really good promo video will be so engaging that people will share it with their friends, family, and peer networks. Other than that, the only way to ensure a video gets viewed is to pay for it. The good news is social media is basically built around videos these days, so promoting, boosting, or sponsoring a video ad is quite easy and affordable.

Promo Video Facebook Boost Post

So the next time a client asks about viewcount, you can suggest effective ways to pay for views that will guarantee eyeballs. Other than paying for ads, however, your only alternative to guaranteeing any number of views is to learn to make your videos go viral. Maybe that includes a cat, or a street prank. If you know the secret to ensuring a video goes viral, while promoting a brand in some way, you should probably be making Superbowl commercials for soda companies.

For the rest of us, we don’t produce viewcounts. We produce really great videos.

Corporate Video Production Is Not Low Budget Filmmaking

If you’ve already read our article on documentary filmmaking equipment, you’ll know that there’s a law of diminishing returns when it comes to video equipment. You get better results with more expensive and sophisticated equipment, but at a certain point, the gear starts to take over and your productivity and profits start to decline.

Much of what we recommend for a highly portable, efficient, and affordable documentary filmmaking it, we also throw in our corporate video production bags. Our camera support, audio equipment, bags and cases, most of our lenses, and the more advanced gear goes with us on promo video shoots as well as doc shoots. But there are a few solid differences between the kits and how we use them.

Video Production Gear for Documentary Filmmaking

Our Documentary Filmmaking Kit

With corporate video, your goal isn’t really to shoot a huge amount of footage, conduct extensive interviews, and then go back and try to edit a story out of what you shot. Instead, you’re carefully planning your shot list, overall message, and how your sequences will tie together, long before you begin to shoot.

So how does that affect what kind of video equipment you use?

Primarily, you need gear that is dependable over cheap and efficient. Because you’ll come away with a lot less shots in general, the footage you do get has to be solid, and you have to be sure you get it right the first time. Once you’ve settled on a video story and strategy with the client, you’re more or less committed to execute that vision, so if during your edit you realize half the day’s shoot had glaring problems, you can’t hide those issues by creatively editing a different story.

Secondarily, you need gear that gravitates more toward quality, rather than toward portability and efficiency. Partly it’s because in today’s world of DSLR consumer cameras, every business knows a friend or family who can make them a free or cheap video with a cinematic look. To give your work more value, your audio and visuals need to be above average.

As we wrote earlier in this article, 99% of people don’t know how videos are produced or why they cost as much as they do. So the perceptions that clients have of your work and its value rests entirely on your communication skills before the shoot, how you present yourself on the day of the shoot, and then finally, the video itself.

Realistically, you might be battling some preconcieved ideas of you and your business long before you get to the final stage of video delivery. So early communication style is very important, especially the confidence you exhibit during the preproduction or video planning process. But if your client chooses to come along on the day of the shoot – or perhaps they’re serving as one of your subjects – then you have an even bigger challenge ahead.

Corporate Video Production Camera

There’s a camera somewhere in there

Imagine all the work you’ve done to get to the day of the shoot: painstakingly writing a great treatment, script, and emails communicating a vision for a really great video that everyone is on board with. And then you arrive with all of your equipment stuffed into a giant suitcase, which you then proceed to build up your camera rig with some 15mm rails, a follow focus, counter weights, an external monitor, an EVF, and batteries attached to the sides of a camera cage, all of which are towering over a little mirrorless camera you have wedged in the center of everything.

For your light kit you have a really crafty softbox you built out of cardboard and transfer paper, and holding your portable recorder with a built-in microphone is an especially long boom pole that’s brilliantly assembled from an old monopod, that now extends further than any boom pole you can buy on the market.

The truth is, your kit might have taken you years of clever rigging and smart shopping, and it might even perform as good or better than the unreasonably expensive video equipment it trumps, but neither your client, nor your subject, nor your audience cares.

Ideally they won’t even notice. But in the off chance your client does notice, we can guarantee they’re not going to be that impressed with your DIY gaff tape solutions.

Corporate Video Production Led Lighting Softbox

In fact, the worse thing that can happen is your client starts to talk to you about his own little DSLR that is pretty much the same as yours. And then when something doesn’t work as it should on set, the client will start to wonder why they’re paying so much for you to shoot this when they have the same gear and can do it themselves.

So if you’re going to be a professional promo video producer, when you can afford better gear, buy the better gear, the stuff that you can depend on, will make your work better overall, and will not raise any feather of doubt in the eyes of your clients.

The Best Camera for Filming Corporate Videos

In the documentary kit article we recommended the Canon C100 for all types of documentary video production, and for corporate or promo video, we recommend the next level up, the Canon C300 mark II.

The C300 mark II is bigger, heavier, much more expensive, and is sometimes more of a pain to use.

For example, the batteries don’t last nearly as long as they do on the C100, the CFast media is insanely expensive still, and the sophisticated options (like color and profile settings) can be a little overwhelming to the everyday documentary shooter.

But for slower paced, more deliberate promo video productions, the C300 mark II is perfect. The image quality is simply astounding, especially around skin tones.

There’s 4k and slow motion recording, if your project requires it. The ergonomics make it so fun to shoot with, especially pared down without a lot of rigging.

Canon C300 Mark II

In the end, the most important thing is the image quality, and with the C300 mark II you don’t have to spend a lot of time fiddling with color grading to achieve a beautiful image. You can ask any C300 owner and they’ll tell you, their clients love what they see.

As for lenses, for the most part we stick with our typical lens kit of a Canon 17-55mm or Canon 24-105mm for our normal lens, a Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS for our telephoto and interview lens, and a Tokina 11-16mm or the super affordable Canon 10-18mm for the ultra wide. But because we have more time for our shoots, we can also choose lenses that are less practical for fast-paced doc shooting but deliver excellent quality for a promo video.

Lenses such as the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8, which doesn’t have IS and therefore wouldn’t be in our documentary filmmaking kit, are perfect in a corporate kit. Prime lenses such as the Canon 35mm f/2.0 IS are also great to use on promo shoots. And if you’ve ever wanted a reason to use cinema primes (but don’t shoot fictional narrative films), corporate videos are a great time to get them out.

Tripod, Monopod, Slider and Gimbal

Luckily, our pick for the best tripod, fluid head, and monopod still works with the heavier C300 mark II. As does the Cinevate Duzi V4 slider, which has a load capacity of something like 100 pounds. But sadly, our favorite brushless gimbal for the C100, the Letus Helix Jr., is a little bit too small for the C300 mark II.

Canon C300 Letus Helix

A Canon C300 mark II on a Letus Helix Standard

So if you want to take your C300 promo videos to the next level and shoot with a gimbal, you’ll need to consider a bigger gimbal such as the Letus Helix Standard. And once you add the heavier weight of the camera, the gimbal, bigger batteries and more rigging, it becomes a lot more difficult to hold for extended periods of time (unlike the C100/Helix Jr. which you can hold for hours comfortably).

There are support options for helping you hold a heavy gimbal rig, something like an Easy Rig, and then you have to consider additional gear that helps steady the gimbal for walking shots, such as a Flowcine Serene, all of which can add up to being more expensive than the camera itself. The law of diminishing returns applies here big time.

(We did review an innovative new gimbal support solution from Letus in this article, but time will tell if we add this to our corporate filmmaking kit permanently.)

So we’ve figured out how to minimize the weight and rigging of the C300 mark II on the Letus Helix Standard, including using a super low light lens such as the Canon 10-18mm or Canon 18-135mm, and replacing the gimbal handle with the C300 handle for easier operation. You can read the article and see photos of our setup here.

Teleprompter

One aspect of corporate video that you may be unprepared for is the need for a teleprompter. They can get quite expensive, especially if you end up not using one all that much.

We’ve had great luck with the Pad Prompter, which has been around for a few years now. It’s designed for the 9.7” iPad, but we’ve tested it out and it actually works with the 12” iPad Pro too, which gives you more screen space for your script.

Corporate Video Production Teleprompter

You’ll need to purchase a tele prompting app that you can use on both your iPad as well as your iPhone/iPod as your remote. We recommend the ProPrompter Studio, which has a simple GUI but is robust enough for many kinds of custom needs.

If you’ve never used a teleprompter before – whether that means running one, or reading one – you’ll want to give yourself plenty of practice in advance of your first shoot with it. The slightest change in speed or font size can mean the difference between a happy subject who delivers a great performance, to complete and utter frustration and a failed shoot. We’ve been there – it’s not pretty.

Interview Lighting Kit

At last, we come to the light kit. It’s incredible how many options we have for lighting products, competing for your primary three point light kit. In our documentary article we prefer lights that are extremely portable, over output or durability. Here, the name of the game is the most amount of light you can buy for the money, built with reasonable expectation of durability, and the expectation that you’ll most likely diffuse your light through an umbrella, softbox, or silk diffuser.

Why are there differences between the two setups, when our final talking head shot will probably look quite similar? Partly it’s because we have more time to setup, which means we can use more sophisticated setups, but primarily it’s because in a corporate video shoot you need to be prepared to make any interview location look like a million bucks.

corporate video production shooting in a basement

Filming in a Basement

In a documentary setting, usually you can get away with cutting corners – after all you’re the director and shooter (and probably editor), so you know what will be good enough (but maybe not perfect.

For example, you can conduct the interview in offbeat places like down in a basement, outside on an public sidewalk or in a park, or even in your hotel room. We’ve done that and more many times on many doc shoots.

When you have a corporate video client to appease, however, shooting in your hotel room is probably not going to fly. So the terrible conference room they’ve reserved for you? That’s where you’re shooting the interviews. And it’s up to you to make it look great.

For our corporate video lighting kit, we recommend one of the Aputure Light Storm LED lights, either the Light Storm LS1S daylight version, or the Light Storm LS1C bi-color version if you prefer LED panels. Or the Light Storm COB120D if you prefer a highly flexible LED Fresnel with a variety of diffusion options.

Aputure Light Storm LS1S and LS1C LED Panels

The Light Storm panel is very solid and has immense light output for its size, and the quality of the light has a very high CRI value of 95+. You can power them with AC or batteries, and they have a convenient remote that allows you to adjust output and color while standing behind your camera and watching your frame.

Promo Video Interview Lighting Kit

Shooting with the Aputure LS1C in a D-Fuse Softbox, and an Amaran 672W for a rim light.

The Light Storm panels have the power and feel of much more expensive LED 1×1 lights, but they’re still quite affordable. They are definitely nowhere near as portable as the Aputure Amaran lights (which we prefer for the documentary kit), but for promo shoots they’re perfect. In fact, combining the two types of lights for a 3 point kit is easy to do, since the Aputure remote can control all the lights.

If you’re having trouble choosing between the daylight or bi-color version, the daylight version has twice the output, but of course you’ll need colored gels for anything but a day rated white balance. In our experience, the bi color is more than enough light for indoor interviews, but it has difficulty competing against the sun in outdoor interviews. So if you plan on doing anything outdoors, the LS1S would be better. If you’re doing mostly indoor shoots, the bi-color is very convenient.

You’ll want to use some sort of diffusion for your key light, and the simplest solution out there is the D-Fuse Softbox. There are better and bigger light sources out there, but for us, the D-Fuse does a good enough job that anything more complex or expensive starts to have diminishing returns.

You can read more a more in-depth discussion on using Aputure LED panel lights for various shooting in this article.

Aputure Light Storm COB 120D LED Fresnel​

If you want to go with a more flexible LED fresnel option, the Aputure Light Storm COB120D is as powerful as the LS1S panel (when the fresnel beam angle matches its 25 degrees), but it can also be adjusted from 14 degrees​ to 120 degrees. Shot through a diffusion scrim, or umbrella, or the Aputure Light Dome, it becomes a very powerful yet soft key light. It’s also very powerful simply bounced onto the ceiling.

aputure cob 120d

We do a full review of the Aputure COB 120D in this article. Also keep in mind that Aputure is coming out with the COB 300D sometime in 2017. It won all sorts of awards at NAB, so it might just become the light to get later this year.

Conclusion: What’s next for your video production company?

That’s our wrap for this long article on corporate or promo video production. We hope it’s helpful to you and your video production company. If you want to share your tips, as well as list of gear you like to bring on your corporate video shoots, please contact us and we’ll publish your tips here.

Are there aspects of corporate video production you want to learn more about? Let us know what other topics you think we should feature on this site. Send us an email and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.

Thanks for reading!​

 

Mr Rogers Techno

mattkprovideo.com/2017/09/07/mr-rogers-techno/

Coolest Mister Rogers Neighborhood episode ever?

 

http://www.neighborhoodarchive.com/mrn/episodes/0068/index.html

 

Coolest Mr Rogers Neighborhood episode ever?  An early techno / electronic music create shows up to teach Fred Rogers about getting down to a new sound.

Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood |

Episode 0068

 

Mister Rogers arrives with a collection of model cycles which he plays with on the floor. He describes the difference between a tricycle, a bicycle, and a unicycle. Picture Picture shows a film about people riding real cycles including a tandem cycle made for two people.

After the film, Mister Rogers sings “Everybody’s Fancy” before Mr. McFeely stops by and describes how he rides his delivery bicycle.

 

Mister Rogers is invited to “Miss Nelson and Bruce’s dance studio” to see a musical computer.

At the dance studio, Mister Rogers visits with Bruce Haack who demonstrates a synthesizer which allows him to create various sounds. Miss Nelson arrives with a group of young dance students who spin as they sing a song about wheels.

The children continue moving and singing to the various sounds of the synthesizer as they pretend to ride bicycles and pretend that they are cats.

Mr. McFeely finds Mister Rogers at the dance studio to tell him that there is a surprise for him back at the house. Upon returning to his house, Mister Rogers enters to find his cat, Blackberry, waiting for him inside.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Rogers

 

https://www.fredrogers.org

 

http://www.openculture.com/2014/05/mr-rogers-introduces-kids-to-experimental-electronic-music.html

While Haack’s Mr. Rogers appearance may not have seemed like much at the time, in hindsight this is a fascinating document of an artist who’s been called “The King of Techno” for his forward-looking sounds meeting the cutting edge in children’s programming. It’s a testament to how much the counterculture influenced early childhood education. Many of the progressive educational experiments of the sixties have since become historical curiosities, replaced by insipid corporate merchandising. What Haack and Nelson’s musical approach tells me is that we’d do well to revisit the educational climate of that day and take a few lessons from its freeform experimentation and openness. I’ll certainly be playing these records for my daughter.

Commercial / Corporate Video Production

Commercial / Corporate Video Production

https://mattkprovideo.com/2017/01/23/commercial-corporate-video-production/

I love making corporate / business / explainer videos. I can be creative and productive with clients who are more professional and easier to work with than music video or wedding video clients.

I shot these using a profession Canon DSLR, a slider, a gimbal, and edited using Adobe After Effects and Adobe Premiere.

Two of several Lawyer Videos I made for attorney Vic Feazell:

http://www.withviclegal.com

San Antonio Dance Umbrella:

Whiteboard animation for ARTEX FUNDING:

And another animated video for the same client:

http://www.artexfunding.com

Renowned author and women’s leadership motivational speaker Dr. Cortney Davis hired me to shoot and edit a promo video for her upcoming speaking tour:

http://cortneybaker.com/

Sports video for BITTER LACROSSE

Two Promo videos I was hired to make for a new app “My Box Nine.” These feature both video and 2D animation.

I was hired to make this ad for a group of business owners hoping to prevent a zoning law change in their neighborhood. It is 7 and a half minute along. I am especially proud of the animated graphics at .54 seconds and 1 min 54 secs,

Animated ad for Round Rock Honey.

Part of a “Sizzle Reel” pitching a potential reality series starring “outlaw biker” Jesse James:

Created in Adobe Photoshop and After Effects.

Web commercial promoting Austin Pedicabs for Weddings:

made with a Go Pro, a Canon DSLR and Adobe After Effects.

keywords: Adobe Photoshop, After Effects, Adobe Premiere, video Production, business video, corporate video, video editing, motion graphics, sales, marketing, lawyer, legal video, commercial, tv commercial,