www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/12/08/truth-is-the-only-client
Truth is the Only Client: The Official Investigation of the Murder of John F. Kennedy
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt12527548/?ref_=fn_all_ttl_1
Directors: Todd Kwait and Rob Stegman
www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/12/08/truth-is-the-only-client
Truth is the Only Client: The Official Investigation of the Murder of John F. Kennedy
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt12527548/?ref_=fn_all_ttl_1
Directors: Todd Kwait and Rob Stegman
www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/11/23/dealey-plaza-dallas-nov-22-2024/
Two years in a row…?
Here are some video clips of the goings on in Dealey Plaza ( Dallas, Texas) to commemorate the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963.
I disagree with many of the things said and done today ( November 22, 2024,) but remembering President Kennedy will always be a good thing.
I’ve been enjoying a YouTube show about the history of SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE.
It seems to be made by two 2 very knowledgeable SNL superfans. There doesn’t seem to be ANYTHING these don’t know about their favorite show.
Everything You NEED to Know About SNL
We’ve all met the type. There isn’t much superfans of something can’t tell you from memory about shows like STAR TREK or whatever else…
Its interesting and engaging and VERY well put together.
SO well put together that it has sparked a benign low level conspiracy theory in my head.
The show is so well produced, has high quality 4K footage from SNL’s earliest days. At first I thought that they were such devoted fans that they had every episode on VHS or DVD and that they “ripped” the source material and edited into their show.
And that may be the truth. BUT, they seem to have footage from episodes ( that I don’t think) was ever released on home video. And you can’t “rip” material from a professional streaming service, can you? I can’t think of how somebody could “rip” materal off of something like PEACOCK. But where there’s a will there might be a way…
And if that was the case, wouldn’t PEACOCK send them a cease and desist?
Using copyrighted material on YouTube is a confusing, slippery slope. If I owned the rights to SNL’s reruns and found out somebody had made an elaborate love letter to my property, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. But that’s me, we’ve all heard of copyright attorneys coming after content creators with a hammer. Maybe because they HAVE to? If they let something slip past, it weakens their claim to ownership? (“Why are you coming after ME when you didn’t go after them??”).
Every episode of this YouTube show ends with saying “SNL’s reruns are viewable on Peacock.”
I didn’t know that. I have PEACOCK and didn.t know they were streaming the earliest SNL episodes. So I clicked on Peacock and started perusing the crude ( in every sense of the word) early episodes. Some of it was better than I remember, some it has not aged well.
I spend more time on YouTube these days than regular TV or even streaming. I assume a lot of us do. I wouldn’t have known to click on PEACOCK to see SNL re-runs if not for this YouTube show made by these superfans.
BUT! a lightbulb went off over my head!
Have I been tricked? Was that YouTube show made by Superfans a ruse? A hidden commercial made BY Peacock itself???
How else would those guys get such extremely high quality footage from episodes that ( I don’t think) were ever released on home video?
The camera and sound quality are both top notch. As good as anything on regular professional TV- let alone YouTube. Their opening and closing graphics were also of professional caliber. Not that some YouTubers don’t put their heart and soul into making pro grade content, many do. But this is a cut above.
Does anyone know if “Everything You NEED to Know About SNL” is being produced by PEACOCK itself or if it really is made by fans who happen to be damn good at what they do?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRqyVjTQ_fE
“An Uncensored History of Saturday Night Live” : Author interview (2003)
www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/10/03/video-about-mad-magazine/
A youtube video documentary about the history of MAD magazine.
I saw a newly made YouTube documentary on MAD magazine. A lot of stuff I’ve seen in older documentaries, but its put together well and includes newer references like MAD-TV.
It also mentions MAD’s forays into television and animation..
I knew about the sketch show on FOX-TV “MAD-TV” but I was surprised that I’d never heard about the cartoon networks show just called “MAD.” that was full of 2D animated cartoons and stop motion animation. I want to find and see THAT show now!
On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 9, Dr Alecia Long
www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/09/08/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-9-dr-alecia-long/
I want to thank everybody for coming this afternoon my name is Fred Litwin noted author Fred Litwin and of course Fred is also the author of I was a teenage JFK conspiracy freak on the trail of delusion and Oliver Stones film flam at the demagogue of D Plaza Fred Litwin is here he’s a longtime author and certainly Watcher of politics uh joining us uh Fred Litwin great to have you here thank you very much
hey welcome to another edition of On the trail of Delusion where we try to separate the wheat from the chaff and we actually try to present serious discussions on the JFK assassinatio
the kind of material that you just won’t see on typical Conspiracy YouTube videos
I’m absolutely delighted today to have Alicia long as my guest Alicia is a professor of history at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge Alicia has written four books the latest book that she’s written is cruising for conspirators which is all about Jim Garrison’s prosecution of Clay Shaw in the 1960s
this is her fourth book and there’s another book coming on the way which we’ll talk about
Alicia has a ma from Ohio University and a PhD from the University of Delaware and I have to say that your book Cruising for Conspirators is not only one of the best books written on this topic but I I know this topic but in fact when I read this book I found it exciting I found your narrative to be incredibly exciting even though I knew it was going to happen
I said wow this is so well written and so interesting um that uh this book is going to stand the test of time I mean a 100 years from now people will still be referring to this book as one of the classic books on the case so I’m absolutely delighted um to be here and my first question is sort of what got you interested in Jim Garrison
So you know my work and training as a historian uh my dissertation was focused on the City of New Orleans and so New Orleans really is kind of like the central location for the stories and histories that I’m interested in as a you know research historian and um my first book was um about the history of prostitution in New Orleans
between the end of the Civil War and 1920 and the Storyville vice district and one of the sources that’s very rich in New Orleans is court records
and so the first book was really based on a series of Court records and um what you see immediately whether you’re looking at New Orleans or Louisiana more broadly is you know that there are many miscarriages of justice and that’s that’s true everywhere um but because New Orleans is such a distinctive place and has so many characters
Sometimes these stories are just super Vivid out of the court records and um I originally set off I think to write a book about morals in the 1960s just to kind of understand that decade in the city’s history but you know I came across the Shaw story and the Garrison prosecution and that seemed like you know a glaring example of a miscarriage of Justice and um you know as you know the evidentiary record around just the Garrison investigation is huge and so you know it’s it’s that was plenty of material to write a book and it’s plenty of material to write half a dozen
you know more books in terms of uh you know that particular h District Attorney’s tenure in office
but it was also really uh you know it was a very volatile time in the United States
but it’s also a really volatile time uh of change in New Orleans and so that’s you know that’s my background as a historian and a research historian is is New Orleans
and also the history of sexuality so so the first book is really about you know kind of as a feminist take on uh prostitution and this book uh really reflects kind of my sense of uh you know how badly uh LGBT plus people were treated
in fact and in law um in the mid 20th century and how this case not only is an example of that but it really kind of provides us a window into um how that worked uh you know on a kind of mechanical level in law um and in culture and society and so that’s kind of that’s where my research comes from
it’s an interest in New Orleans in the history of sexuality it’s you know New Orleans is a fascinating place so you know you’re you’re an historian and I think you’ve probably read a lot of uh conspiracy books on the JFK assassination but can you talk a bit about uh your expertise as a historian and what that brings to the table and how you might when you read conspiracy books how you know how are they lacking in what you would call good material for historians so you know I mean I was I was thinking about this a lot and I’m teaching a historiography course for graduate students this semester where we really look at the history of how historians are trained um what they’re taught to believe about what they’re doing um and how that changes over time and you know in the early 20th century I think historians were uh really obsessed with the idea of objectivity and they felt like they could just be objective enough that they could you know rebuild the past in a very reliable um way and that that belief and objectivity uh I think has really waned over the course of the 20th century and into the 21st and I think most people are willing to acknowledge that they have uh you know presumptions about things um that they have sort of you know they bring things to the table with them that help shape their work but having said that I mean I think the really valuable thing about the way historians are training in graduate school is that you really are taught to focus on evidence right right I mean question formulation is uh you know an act of creativity and Imagination and you know predisposition what are you interested in um but once you settle on a question you know you really are trained to identify as much archal material as you can and try to put that story together in as complete a way as you can understanding that there are questions you won’t be able to answer much of the material written about Garrison at the time um and then let’s say like in the late 20th century no one was super polarized but beyond that the books that seemed to me the best books were the books that were dealing in evidence right either um archal evidence or they’re going out and doing interviews like you you’ve done a lot of interviews right um and you’re talking to people um you know about things they experienced or saw firsthand and there you know this whole class of books related to The Garrison investigation that are so obsessed with defending Jim Garrison um and defending his um activities um particularly around the Kennedy assassination but more generally I think I tried really hard to be fair to Jim Garrison um as a historical figure um I don’t think he’s an admirable person um or public official um but I really looked at his you know his record from you know the late 40s forward and a lot of the things that happened and you know this I mean a lot of the things that happened in the Garrison investigation there was a pattern that was already set you know before he got there that uh is that gets replicated uh in his prosecution of Clay Shaw and there are numerous examples of that so you know I think looking at that you know staying in the evidence um is something that I think historians are trained to do and I teach a course for undergrad um called the history of conspiracy in the United States and we really look at it from the time of the Declaration of Independence to the 21st century and you know there’s a question that I always ask them you know when they make U assertions about things and there are um I have numbers of students who are you know predisposed to conspiracy thinking um but we always kind of you know land on that question about what is the evidence here yeah right and you know in terms of the Kennedy assassination the preponderance of the evidence is that Lee Harvey Oswald did it are there many you know questions about you know where he was and what he was doing and what the hell is going on here and you know mean obviously um but if if we’re going to stay in the evidence that’s where you land yeah very true and I think the the same can be said the evidence against Clay Shaw is pretty weak if not of almost non-existent right yeah it’s very shoddy
Moo Sciaambra who developed a lot of testimony among Witnesses and the the big example there’s the Clinton Witnesses you know whose initial depositions are all over the place but by the time they come to testify these story sort of narrowed into something that is you know moderately coherent and and consistent um but that’s because he he works with these witnesses to develop that testimony that is something districts attorney District Attorneys do um but there was a you know there was a lot of really shady stuff um you know happening there I think the same and I’m gonna I’m gonna flake on the name this morning I’m sorry but the the drug addict who
uh yeah that’s also you know another one of those stories where Bundy understands what they’re looking for and he hands it to them what let’s go back to I mean you you live in Baton Rouge I do you you have a an expertise on understanding New Orleans but also Louisiana um I’m from Canada so I don’t have that expertise I don’t have that knowledge so perhaps you can talk a bit about Louisiana and New Orleans and what what is it about those places that makes this case interesting or stand out or what you know what do people need to know about Louisiana and New Orleans yeah I would say just kind of generally I’m I’m really grateful I I came to LSU at uh in 2007 and that was my second academic job taught at Georgia State University before that and had worked in the Louisiana State Museum for six years before that so I’ve been at this long time now and um but one of my charges and I was hired to teach Louisiana history and I teach a big survey course on Louisiana history every semester um and I’m really grateful for that because you know before I had that job I I really was I think I had a lot of expertise on New Orleans I had less expertise about the state and and that has really kind of enhanced my understanding of um not just how New Orleans is distinctive but how it fits into um the States history and and the States history is very it’s not it’s not that it’s just conservative it’s that you know there seems to be historically speaking a kind of you know a preference for demagoguery right among among the populace uh at the state level um and and you know in in many cases at the you know local level and it’s also really important and and I do this in in cruising for conspirator is really explain how Jim Garrison became so empowered um in his first term in office that by the time he got to investigating the Kennedy assassination there were no controls over him none I mean he effectively was unsupervised he had the governor in his pocket he he arguably got John mckian elected um and so mckian you know is hands off um he has beaten the Attorney General um at the United States Supreme Court and um you know so he is he is a super empowered local official and you have to sort of understand that larger context of what was happening in Louisiana not just in the 1960s but over time to understand how somebody could be operating in the way that he was operating um during that period of time I think there was a history of of uh police corruption in in in Louisiana as well um yeah and and this um this new book that I’m working on um what’s so interesting to me is how these people uh keep popping up over time and so Persian geret right uh is U dismissed from the police force in 1953 um for um you know they sort of soft pedal but there’s you know there is testimony that he and his partner are actually coordinating these safe cracking robberies right while they’re cops and so ultimately he’s dismissed from the police force and this all happens the the new book is a is about marage and a murder and a miscarriage of Justice in the early 1950s and there’s a a murder of this woman named U Diddy Cooper by her um then husband James Cooper who owned the Quarter Two Sisters restaurants you can sort of see how this all like floating around in the French Quarter and Jer is right in the middle of it right um and this big police corruption Scandal I think in part um accounts for why there is such a miscarriage of Justice in her murder um but so you have to sort of you know know who these people are and who these characters are and so if you know that backstory about persan jery um Jim Garrison making him his chief investigator in 1962 is this extraordinary kind of Fu right um and you know and also a kind of indicator of how that office will be run in terms of um using that office to um enrich themselves using the legal process um in ways that are very Sim iCal yeah one one of my favorite stories about persing jery was told to me by Milton brener um that he that he would find out which cases in the DA’s office were not going to be prosecuted and then he we go to those people and say well I can get your case dismissed if you pay me money and of course it would all it would looked at those people like he was highly successful right yeah he he he was a real operator uh and I love after he left the DA’s office um at the time of the um first campaign for re-election for Garrison that he told I don’t remember who he told this to but he described himself as an underworld on budsman right you know it’s it’s classic it’s it’s fascinating tell me a bit about um perhaps a history of homosexuality in Louisiana or New Orleans and how it was looked upon in the 1960s because sometimes people think oh New Orleans was so uh open about stuff but it wasn’t completely open so if you want to perhaps talk a bit about homosexuality sure I mean there’s you know this is important I think you know particularly because of you know contemporary uh kind of conservative culture War issues and I think sort of understanding the longer history of this is really important particularly for young people who have you know grown up in a world that is so different yeah from you know the uh 21st century uh you know world and and and you know New Orleans likes to Pride itself on being liberal um and its critics like to think of it that way but there is actually you know there are a lot of these uh you know reformers in New Orleans in the early 1950s who are themselves kind of obsessed with homosexuality and particularly the visibility of it in the French quarter and they battle it really hard um through city ordinances um through uh lobbying the state legislature and having a sort of legal regime set up in place by the late 1950s in New Orleans or for the state actually and you know homosexuality which it would have been called at the time you know it’s becomes the kind of this placeholder for uh decadence and the kind of disreputability uh that the city has and so you know there’s a huge campaign there’s a big one in 1953 there’s another one in 1958 um and the early 1960s police are raiding gay bars on a very very consistent basis and just hauling people in and often they’re not even charged but it’s you know it’s the it’s the harassment and and and I’ll also say because you know I think it’s really important to distinguish you when particularly when doing this kind of work like uh you know kind of close historical work really to distinguish between the police and the District Attorney’s offices um because there’s often a lot of tension in there and and what I found in the historical record and I’ve written a couple of articles about it um is you know the police are kind of dragged into to right uh this um because for them it it’s a lot of trouble and a lot of hassle to be raiding These Bars all the time and and dragging these people in and processing them and then a lot of these cases just get n acrossed so it’s like you know it’s it’s you know it UPS their level of uh you know work you know and and processing people in the French Quarter and and I think they knew that for the most part uh you know not always but for the most part the the establishments that were gay or gay adjacent um were no different than and in many cases a lot um less criminally adjacent than many other places in the French Quarter but they ultimately get sort of drawn into these reformers quests to uh rid the City of New Orleans of this reputation and a visible you know homosexuality homosexual communities in the French border that is something that’s important again to understand with regard of the Garrison investigation and the shaw matter and there’s a there’s a photo that I use and I think youve probably I’m sure you’ve seen this one of three of Garrison’s investigators sitting at a table and it’s full of you know mug shots of men and boys and you know exactly what those are that’s that big pool of pretty vulnerable gay people they have arrested and now they can sort of you know try to button hole and harass and there are you know a number of specific cases of that type they don’t create that uh you know situation but they exploit it mercilessly not just in the of Shaw but in trying to uh find witnesses who will confirm these you know this crazy theory that they have developed about you know David fery and Clay Shaw and Lee Harvey Oswell and and that also I mean the going combining that with the DA’s power of subpoena he actually could actually um subpoena to appear either before the grand jury or in his office but um people were sort of scared of Garrison he had a lot of power they were nervous absolutely they were I mean a lot of G people went underground and you I mean you have people uh you know talk about that in interviews um that the District Attorney’s Office does um and they also uh there’s one interview and again I’m not going to remember the specific name because there’s so much of this kind of stuff but that um you know one gay bar owner uh said that his partner had been told that if they would produce testimony you know putting Clay Shaw and David FY together that they could run their drag shows um without harassment right and and you also see it in Jean Davis’s testimony before the grand jury where he you know is essentially like saying I’ll say whatever you want me to say because I’ve always given you evidence isn’t that right Mr Garrison and then Garrison says yes and like Gan Davis is a kind of quintessential you know kind of gay bar owner who uh is you know very much part of a certain segment of uh the gay community in the French Quarter um but also an informant for the police um you know trying balance all those things so he can stay in business yeah and stay out of jail ideally exactly yeah so it’s an incredible milu and I I mean I’ll go back to there’s one conspiracy author who claims the problem with me and others like you is that you don’t understand New Orleans and only this person understands New Orleans and I find that you know quite quite ridiculous that uh people say that because you certainly understand New Orleans and Louisiana well you know I think you have to under just with regard to this particular um author um you know I recently discovered that there was a second part of um a very absurd uh it proport to be a book review um of cruising for conspirators and and you know it’s not I can’t really take it seriously because at the first one in the first review uh that this person wrote uh it was clear this person had not read the book right I mean I think they might have read a um you know an excerpt or a preview um but yeah I mean there’s some people just so um defensive and uh and mean is not the right word but just so sort of like angry and costic and toxic yeah and you can’t I you know you cannot engage meaningfully with a person who approaches their subject matter in that way and I’m about as a as a professor you know as a teacher I’m all about you know having just you know having respectful disagreements with people yeah and walking away with a relationship with that person intact um and and you know that to me is teaching and that to me is dialogue and I think there are some people in the conspiracy Community with whom you can have conversations um you know but not many not many it’s really it’s a how few you can and and and then I’ll just say this and then we can move on but you know I also think there is no little sexism in in you know some of the treatment that I received um from one author in particular and you know I hope that person will do some self-examination um because I think they have a problem with women I hope so too and I think you’re right but uh I somehow doubt it yeah well I’m not g to get my hugs up but don’t hold your breath no so let’s talk a bit about um Clay Shaw okay what led Garis Garrison to Clay Shaw and what kind of life he was leading um in New Orleans in the 1960s he had it pretty good uh right up until um you know he becomes a suspect and um he’d been traveling he was in Spain for a period of time he was in England for a period of time he had uh saved enough money and made enough money from uh you know flipping properties in the French quar that he had a secure retirement in place and uh I think he was enjoying himself despite the dangers I think he had a you know pretty uh active uh sex life and that was an important part of his life um and had been for a long period of time he’s very attractive man you know and I didn’t have problems finding Partners when he is identified I mean you have to I mean know what happened in December when he’s interviewed in December I think the tone of that interview is is really interesting because you see him in that particular interview kind of like balancing the danger he’s in with a kind of covering you know a sort of closedness around his identity as a homosexual and and when he is uh you know when he’s arrested there’s this whole period of time where for practical reasons I think but also because he’s doing a lot of self-examination he stops picking men up and and having relationships and a lot of people you know fall away from him and he kind of isolates himself and there are a very small number of people with whom he has relationship Jeff bson is probably like the you know the closest example with whom he’d been a couple for you know many years before and um you know this upends his life I mean he you know he becomes identified as a potential conspirator in the assassination of JFK and I just I think about him often in you know in the courtroom uh watching the Auda film over and over and over and watching Kennedy’s head be blown apart and being identified as a person had something to do with that to you know to stand in that room that was a really devastating you know thing for him uh and he never quite recovered from it and you know even when he is you know like there’s a letter I want to say it’s like from maybe six months before he dies he says you know it doesn’t matter that I was found not guilty this is going to be my legacy this is you know and and and that’s also you know a part of the tragedy is that despite losing resoundingly in court right um in a you know in an environment that he largely controlled the terms of Garrison I mean you know despite losing uh he still goes after him and and you know when he dies all bets are off so you know people who support Garrison just seem to like you know alide the the the verdict in court you know there’s always there’s always a reason that it’s corrupt you know there’s always a reason that you know these people are wrong and it’s a you know it’s a I don’t think it’s a very balanced way to look at those events no the G gon’s supporters would say well Garrison never mentioned homosexuality well that is BS and it’s not true Garrison was kind of a u a master of you know saying something and then disowning having said it you know what I mean as as it became inconvenient I mean and you know you can say what you want about James failen but you know Garrison didn’t sue him over that article you know um in fact you know also think Garrison was one of those people who understood the value of publicity um good or bad right as long as he was in the news uh that was that was working for him in some way um and you know so this not true and um you know I once saw um a noted Garrison Defender um I was on a panel with this person it’s one of the rudest people um I’ve ever been on a panel with I me just like astoundingly rude and unprofessional but um you know this person you know in talking about that James failen article uh in in response to a question from the audience says well you know he made a mistake there and he was sorry well how do you know number one what difference does it make I mean you know you don’t have to out somebody multiple times to you know to have used that as a methodology um to make somebody you know um legible as as suspicious um and so you know that is what happened and you know if you want to excuse it you’re welcome to do that but it it that is not a um that is not an evenhanded um you know uh evaluation of of that evidence I’m I’m struck by uh his Playboy interview in September uh 1967 if you look at the Preamble the intro to that interview um they talk about Clay Shaw being the queen bee of the homosexual community in New Orleans well that’s not Garrison saying that but he wrote a large part of that it really is him saying he never objected to to Playboy putting that in and that there’s these Illusions all over the case yeah and then you and you’re the person who made me aware of the confidential um article um that appears just months before this case goes to trial and the fact that it’s you know fed by evidence from the District Attorney’s office and the way that evidence was handled in that case is I mean just scandalous in terms of like chain of custody and I’m talking you know about the the material taken from Shaw’s home uh the night of the arrest and how that gets like moved around to Robert Heath’s office how it goes to you know uh Garrison’s Suburban home for a photo shoot with Life magazine and you know these are uh you know that is just it’s like a complete uh you know betrayal of the public trust the way the evidence in that case was used and I would be more shocked by it if it were a kind of unique circumstance but um you know it was not and um you know there were many Shenanigans undertaken by Garrison and his investigators as regards evidence in that case and many others what’s amazing is that the case went to trial that’s the amazing thing and that really has to do with cowardice on the part of those three judges who who let the thing move forward I think they were afraid of Garrison and they were afraid of um somehow being branded as people who didn’t want to get to the truth about the Kennedy assassination and that that was a scary thing um at that period of time and that points to another thing about G Garrison had a very very uh he was responsible for some of the judges getting elected so he had some of the judges sort of in his back pocket he absolutely did and I you know I have read somewhere and I don’t I don’t know this to be the case and I’m trying to remember it was in a transcript of of you know of an interview that somebody gave a deposition and and there was an implication that Hagerty who had a drinking problem you know hackery actually had like bounced a bunch of checks the District Attorney’s Office you know kind of knew this and kind of threatened to make it public if you know if Hagerty didn’t uh you know play ball uh in their View and and that Hagerty made some of the calls he did I think actually you know was to his credit um in that in that courtroom knowing you know that Garrison could make him look bad if he wanted to but and then you know his behavior after the case when he’s like you know caught in the motel room with the prostitutes and you know uh brings porn movies from that have been seized I me you know it sort of gives you a sense of the irregularities that you know uh you know are part of criminal district court in in New Orleans during that era um and uh yeah it’s you know it’s a crazy crazy story yeah and you you could see it in some of the grand jury testimony I mean Carlos koga’s grand jury testimony Garrison sort of threatening them continually threatening them you know um you know you should think about what you’re saying and and uh I’ll give you time to go outside and take a break and come back in and and bobu too right I mean who they you know I mean literally threatened physically threatened um yeah and and and have material um of him um that is um you know very incriminating um and um you know try to hold that over his head and that he refused to testify and that he refus to uh help you know underg guard that flimsy story um I think also was pretty brave right um you know in in that moment because you know they’ll threaten anybody um to get what they want I mean it seems to me that’s what the record suggests is happening yeah yeah for sure the other thing that I I’m found striking is the um perhaps this whole case would have gone wouldn’t have gone forward if if there had been Discovery in Louisiana courts right the Garrison didn’t have very stingy yeah yeah um yeah and you know this is also a period of time when they have the you know non-unanimous jury verdicts um and you know so in this case I think there were 12 I think you know only nine of them would have had to say guilty um you know to to get a guilty verdict the way you know this worked at at that time in Louisiana law and that has since been addressed and now you do have to have unanimous jury verdicts particularly in capital cases but um you know also I mean I mean I’m asking you a question now but like what’s interesting this is such a low bar case I mean it’s a conspiracy case now conspiracy cases can be extremely serious and if he was convicted he could spend a long time in prison but I mean they’re fairly easy cases to prove if there is in fact a demonstrable conspiracy right the crime didn’t even have to happen they just have to have people in discussion with each other but the evidence you know that they present for that of this you know conspiratorial discussion is so flimsy um and Russo is such a disaster on the stand also a very vulnerable person uh who is you know manipulated threatened uh you know um in certain ways it’s it’s it’s amazing that it went ahead it’s amazing that the trial you know went on um and I guess I’m less familiar and you may know more about this I sort of less familiar with uh how that was evaluated from outside Louisiana you know how people saw that um and and did they see it as just a kind of you know Banana Republic kind of you know charade you know uh in Louisiana or was it you know something that was taken seriously and I’m trying to think you know if if I know the answer to that I’m not so sure that I do but I think you know like the national networks I think had Garrison’s number um but but they covered the case you know because it was big news and and I think also well certainly in Louisiana the times pikun and the state’s item really took him seriously and and they could have really blown a lot of this out of the water but didn’t and didn’t say Garrison until after the verdict yeah and that you know that too is you know the newspapers yeah then he needs to resign you know but they’re hedging their bets the whole time it reminds me of that uh the time of the 1927 flood in the Mississippi River and everybody in the city can see that the river is rising but the newspapers are not printing anything about it you know and um it’s you know because they’re it you know they’re involved in the business community and the business Community is concerned that this could hurt business and you know there’s and and and in a way you know they give Garrison a pass for a long time it’s not that it’s not that they’re not critical of him sometimes they are um but just in terms of you know the reporting on the thing it’s it’s often very you know shallow um and and there were people who you know bucked that Trend I think like Rosemary James is probably one of those people um but you know it um it it makes you think about like what you’re seeing in the newspapers and and how to evaluate that on balance you know um in in any case that you’re looking at yeah you were you were one one of very lucky to talk to Rosemary James what what did she tell you about Garrison so I talked to her twice and and in one of the cases I did a formal uh oral history interview with her and I have a transcript of it and um you know she she knew Shaw I mean she had dinner his house uh she was married to her I think first husband at the time and uh you know they were they were so social people but she was also you know a television news reporter at this period of time and and you know she knew Garrison did not play fair um that he tried to make her the issue you know once they uh you know released that story that they have somehow done him wrong but you know she went and told him that they were going to do it and he could you know ask them not to or you know have his side of it you know kind of and he didn’t and uh you know that too I think is a you know a calculation on his part um you know to get it out there but then act like you know the forces against me are you stacked against me um you know kind of thing and uh yeah it’s newspapers are not objective sources they’re the first draft of things and um you know they make mistakes and they don’t always correct them and so you have to you know make sure that um there’s some kind of you know uh corroboration uh for uh particularly significant claims that they make yeah she by the way one what do you think of um well Garrison’s the prosecution of Garrison after the case for uh the bribery and the with the pinball machines and also the income tax evasion well I think probably um so so two things about it one is it’s very interesting that Jer of course is the person who you know turns the evidence um in the in the pinball case uh you know testifies for the feds um and um you know I’ll say this he wasn’t convicted Y and um you know but the transcripts the recorded transcripts that ran in the newspapers were extremely damaging and I’ve never read and I I don’t you know I don’t even know if full transcripts are out there I’ve never read all the trial testimony in those 1970s cases he’s not convicted in either one of those cases and the justice department then and now doesn’t like to take things to Court unless they think they can win um and you know they didn’t win against him and that’s important to acknowledge um but do I think uh Garrison was on the take absolutely and and I think there is evidence of that it just apparently was not compelling enough um in court to get a jury to convict him and uh but even even that and this is probably some sort of like Poetic Justice but like even at that even though he’s not convicted that badly damages him uh not so much that he couldn’t several years down the road get reelected as a judge because he is an appealing political figure to people but he’s not reelected um you know to that what guess it would have been the fourth term or the third term I’m trying to think yes the third term I think yeah I’m not sure third or fourth I reach TR to 66 four years I think he’s there yeah I think his fourth the beginning of his fourth term and Harry conik Jr or Harry conik beats him and I I didn’t know this at the time I published the book but I you know I found something you know Garrison sued him um and said the uh the the election was corrupt um and and and tried to you know sort of get the vote results overturned and um you know and that’s just you know he’s a sore loser you know and uh and but again he was not convicted and he does then become a judge and um you know that doesn’t make him a saint but you know he you know apparently some voters at least were willing to you know Overlook uh those uh trial you know interview transcripts and recorded uh you know conversations between him and Jer yeah well if you read some of those recorded conversations it’s pretty damning but of course U afterwards Jer sort of retracts um everything because he wants to go back to New Orleans and have a life and he realizes that Garrison still has some power um ultimately he does say no it was it was real but but uh it’s kind of interesting to to note that U yeah and yeah that that is you know I mean J had you know been around a long time and um you know had family and you know um you know children and you know does come back to Louisiana and he’s critical of Garrison in the early 90s you know when the when the when JFK comes out you know he’s one of the voices in the newspaper who says it was you know all a sham and a scam and uh you know and uh late in life he he gives an interview I think it’s to the times pyun and you know he um you know he basically admits you know that you know to being sort of a quasa criminal um as a cop and after um but I think you know he saw that and a lot of people saw that as you know just the way things were uh during that period of time yeah he he actually I think he stole all the the all the money on the take money from the from the police himself yeah and took a police character a woman drug addict to New York City um yeah it’s like this I I’m I’m in the records now for you know 1953 and uh you know the investigation into the police and uh you know he fights really hard to be reinstated and it’s ultimately the Louisiana Supreme Court that turns back his claim he kind of tries to make a you know a civil service claim to be reinstated to the police um so that was important to him but you know at that point he essentially becomes you know like an underworld bar owner and you know um you know uh very criminally adjacent oh and I just wanted say one more thing which is that you know the tax evasion charges Aaron con is the person who turns over evidence to the justice department about a Garrison’s taxes versus you know salary and you know what he’s spending and and you know con was a you know a dogged investigator and um also you know an enemy of of garrisons but he’s the person who does that this is not like the you know the CIA telling the justice department to you know I mean you know you know Garrison had you know throttled them in the press and I’m sure they didn’t like him any um you know but they receive evidence from a local source that leads to the tax evasion charges so this is not some sort of you know criminal conspiracy uh you know emanating from the CIA or the FBI it’s it’s cone and it’s a personal Grudge in that particular case the funny thing in the bribery case was the Garrison uh fired his attorneys in the middle of the case and and and and then became his own attorney MH and that probably turned the case around he gave a a long summation at the end I think that probably uh uh convince people you know part of his whole story was they’re after me because of the assassination blah blah blah and and uh I it was a crazy it was absolutely crazy in a certain way you know he must have been I you know he must have been impressive yeah in in the courtroom you know um with opening statements and closing statements but you know one of the things I say at the end of cruising for conspirators I think he kind of you know do you know what jump the shark means yeah you know he sort of jumped the shark at a at a moment um in that summation where he basically says a conspiracy charge is like a murder you know and he and he he’s gets the thing ginned up into something so big that I think it might have given the jury pause you know um what we have here before us is not a very good case um and then he sort of like you know saying you know this is about the president’s murder and if you don’t find this person guilty you’re you know you’re uh you know you’re implicated um in letting the government get away with this conspiracy to kill the president and you know I think he really overdid it there and I think that probably in no small part uh contributed to the uh you know the outcome uh among the jury members um although they were also just exhausted and worn down by the time they they went into that room I mean they’ve been a marathon of closing statements so do you think there was uh do you think Garrison was actually gay himself there may have been some repressed homosexuality that played a part in this so you know I think um uh again Aaron con is a person who like very closely documents uh Garrison’s extraordinary sex life that’s what con calls it and um you know Garrison certainly was sexually Reckless um you know as a person who was married and you know fathered to five children I think um you know he brazenly you know had affairs um and you know mostly what is documented is uh very young women um and he did you know uh uh you know frequent like normal Wallace’s house and you know so he’s he’s clearly having sex with women but there is a there’s a kind of undercurrent of you know like men having sex with other men on the down low is you know what we would call it now right and and I think there’s certainly the possibility of that and and I think that for two reasons one is um I recently discovered uh a newspaper story about Jer when he was about 15 years old and he’s in a car with a 30-year old man very late at night and there’s a car accident and he’s injured so he ends up going to the hospital and when I first looked at it I didn’t I didn’t a lot about it and then I came back to it and it’s like is he hustling you know and there’s this whole kind of like hustling culture in and around the French quarter and you know again Jer married children but I do think there are you know men who have sex with other men and and of course the best evidence for sort of thinking about Garrison’s sexual compulsivity if that’s a word like you know is is grabbing the teenage boy in New Orleans Athletic Club and and so I think for him it might have been more about youth than about you know gender per se and and I tend to think and again I’m not you know I’m not an LGBT plus person but you know I tend to think of being gay is sort of like an identity that people adopt and you know and being proud of who they are um not just sexually but on the whole and so like I think of being gay as an identity and then I think you know some people engage in sex acts that they don’t identify with do you know what I mean like they don’t see it as part of you know and I and I think there was a lot of that kind of thing um you know in New Orleans in the 1950s and 60s uh you know men who married because everybody was expected to get married you know if you know if you didn’t get married that was like considered the problem um but then might also have been having sex with other people male or female so you know I don’t think he was gay but do I think there’s you know a possibility that you know he had uh sex of some kind or the other with men sure absolutely and you know here’s an example like a weird example around this is um uh it’s in the book of another Garrison Defender who talks about uh Garrison and this friend of his having sex with a woman uh you know a sort of a manaja one gal two guys but that they never touched each other’s penises oh well then like you know good times you know it’s like I mean it’s just sort of there’s this you know desperate attempt to excuse everything he does is somehow you know holy pure and you know um you know it’s just it’s a very strange story um but I think it might in fact be a very telling story yeah I I I went through the papers of Patricia Lambert and and she has I have I have not published it but she has a a full transcript of talking to that boy from the New Orleans Athletic Club mhm um which he talks about what happened and also the boy’s brother two two transcripts and so uh some really damning evidence there but um yeah and you know also where are her papers uh sixth floor Museum oh okay oh that’s great I’m glad they’re there yes that that happened I’m sure but what is also true is that the good old boy Network protected him yeah and he had a lot of control over the grand jury who the grand jury Foreman was and Le I’ve recently discovered leish who was one of the grand jury Foreman during this period of time in the 1950s was also a grand jury foran so there the you know there’s this kind of I I I hesitate to call it this but that’s I mean that’s the way it functions it’s kind of good old boys network uh in which this is kind of covered up and so Drew Pearson writes about it but the local newspapers don’t write about it um and Aaron con you know writes a letter and says you know this happened and the grand jury needs to look into this um and you know he got away with it um you know and that’s certainly you know assault um it’s you know attempted crime against nature um you know he could easily have been charged with a 1489 if that family had been willing to you know come forward and do that but but you know they too have interests in the community y um and I think you know also the interest of their sons you know um one of at least one of whom was a minor um and so you know that would have been a very you know I don’t want to say shameful but I think it would have been a very embarrassing thing um to have pursued charges against the sitting district attorney um yeah they were a prominent Catholic Family with high high ranking Catholic clergy so it was a very uh there was no way they’re going to bring that forward was well and also the the you know speaking of you high ranking Catholic clergy and people covering for them um you know conic did that very consistently uh you know sort of like uh made cases or allegations against a priests um you know uh go away for long periods of time um so you know this again the good old boys network at work um you know people looking out for each other so the sad part of this whole case is the fact that unfortunately Clay Shaw died before his damages case could be heard which then allowed G Garrison to write about Shaw and his book and say what ever he wanted to say right that was very unfortunate it was and I’m not you know what’s so interesting is that that weird quirk in Louisiana civil law that said you know you had to have these kind of immediate family members who could step in as plaintiff he didn’t have anybody in that category so you know the claim ultimately according to Louisiana law dies and the Supreme Court decides that the Louisiana law is not inherently prejudicial which says much more about uh the way people thought about you know families and and categories of you know relationship during that period of time in the law um and again I think that’s really reflective of um our own moment you know where uh we are there are parties uh who are attempting you know in the United States to pathologize unmarried childless pet owners you know and somehow the problem these are levers that people try to pull you know and and Shaw’s sexuality was one of those Le that Garrison was willing to use to try and and bring a case forward um against a person who had some vulnerabilities but also had enough uh resources to uh hire very good attorneys and uh you know defend himself um in court thankfully and that raises the whole issue of people who can afford uh those sort of lawyers the miscarriages of justice that occur because of that absolutely and I don’t I can’t remember the percentage it’s something I talk about um in class in in my Louisiana history class there’s a far higher percentage of people in jail incarcerated in Louisiana and we you know we incarcerate more people than anyone else in the world per capita um and you know most of those people have pled out the majority of people never get to trial they take a lower charge they make some sort of deal for lesser time and and and so there’s a way in which our whole you know contemporarily but also historically the way the law is used not to bring about justice but to really kind of like keep certain populations of people under control you know um by manipulating those things and um you know I I think in many significant ways uh lisiana is um a kind of on the Leading Edge of um you know Injustice uh in the United States with you know with its current carceral crisis and and and many of those things but also because of the way uh the Contemporary Administration in Louisiana has just written off anybody uh who disagrees with a very you know Conservative Christian nationalist kind of uh you know position I.E like putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom in the state including uh at universities uh and I’m hoping lawsuits will uh you know keep that from happening because I would find that deeply offensive right to have teach in a university classroom with um a Biblical passage required to be uh in in every room um you know so yeah it’s a a lot of extremes down here absolutely so you know you you teach a you know you’ve taught a course on conspiracy and so tell me a bit about your students and what they think and and after and and after what they think after going through your course right about this case and other and other cases of conspiracy you know i’ I’ve noticed something uh in the class and I don’t know what this means um I’ve taught it I want to say I’ve taught it three times now um it’s a it’s an upper division course and it’s a fairly demanding course and so they have to you know show up and be prepared or they they just can’t successfully you know navigate the course um and I have more women who take that course than men um they and women are a majority of you know University students in the United States today anyway but the males male students who have taken that course tend to be far more uh conspiracy-minded than the women and I don’t I don’t know what that’s about um but that’s just what I’ve noticed um in that course and I think there’s a you know a lot of young men use Reddit and you know um there is a lot of you know this kind of kind of conspiratorial conversation on Reddit and and I think there’s a way particularly that young men are being socialized around conspiracy that is different uh for young women uh who you know who’s who are being fed different kind of things by algorithms or using different platforms so you know my students are really interesting and they teach me things all the time about you know what’s out there in the digital world and you know what they’re things I have no idea about because I don’t I don’t use social media that much um but you know I think they’re pretty smart and I you know I think they’re self- selected group these particular students but they’re very skeptical of um you know broad conspiracy claims um and they come to their own conclusions about those sort of things I’m not I’m not there to um you know uh persecute uh people who believe in conspiracies but they often you know will you know self-report about relatives or you know stepdads or you know whatever like being like real conspiracy you know nuts um and how uncomfortable that makes them and you know what’s so um what’s so alarming about that is is that you know conspiracy has a very long history uh in the United States and you know sort of like bubbles up here and there but I can’t think of a Time besides the McCarthy era um when consp consp iracy has been so consequential in American politics they just got a tendency to believe in conspiracy and to think very lazily about things um to not think critically about you know claims that are being put out in front of you and so you know it’s it’s particularly consequential at the moment in a way that you have sort of like qanon Advocates who are now very influential members of Congress and you know charlatans are not they hold these offices of enormous consequence in people’s lives um and so you know it’s a it’s a very um it’s a time when I think it’s important to slow down and and think about things uh carefully um rather than just kind of getting whipped up you know by the claim of the moment um I mean on the JFK side it used to be it was the left wing that it was all conspiratorial but now it’s the rightwing has discovered oh my God you know it’s a deep State and I’m seeing more and more more congressmen or senators and Republicans um who are like oh oh the JFK assassination oh my God this is evidence of the deep State um you know and the the same forces it’s it’s it’s striking and it’s it’s very uh it’s horrifying but if you think about it like that’s where the JFK records act come from now I’m very grateful for the JFK records act yeah and I think in the end it’s a good piece of legislation but what it was responsive to is Oliver Stone’s movie yep you know and and and his theory of the case um which runs completely counter to the conclusions um taken by you know the government uh bodies investig investigative bodies who looked into the case um so you know they get whipped up into into cultural you know uh soup too and and do things that sometimes have you know beneficial consequences but come out of you know a willingness to uh you know accept a kind of theorizing about the intelligence agencies or um you know U good Lord I mean you know just yeah uh it’s crazy times yeah so the one thing I I do say about Jim Garrison and and Clay Shaw and the whole case is I I wish somebody would make a movie you know I do too and I wish they would license my book you know but what a great topic for a movie Ian it’s just oh yeah you know I I when I tell people this story they’re so fascinated nobody really knows it and it’s a very interesting story yeah you know I tell you and and this is probably just me being like older or oldfashioned um but you know young people don’t read books and you know and uh and and yeah if somebody could make a you know a version of this that runs counter to the kind of mythologies uh and you know U you know shaming of people um in in JFK and and you know tell that story from you know a different angle um you know I think that’ be fabulous um and uh you know you know time will tell huh time will tell so we’re gonna we’re gonna end the interview but I think um I know is there anything else you want to tell us about you know your terrific book well thank you for your uh compliments and you know um one of the great things about being a professor or a writer or a thinker and and you know you you know this too is that you know you’re constantly learning how to do new things and um and and in part that’s the kind of appeal of that sort of work and um so I was you know moving probably plotting Le a narrative non-fiction Direction there and and I’m going to move further in that direction um uh in in this next project which you know I I see as an as a series of books right that gets us to back to this question and and I hope to retell this story in in a different way um as as I go on this journey uh with this new set of books so um you know I’m excited about the future but I you know I also stand by cruising for conspirators and it’s the book I’m proud of it’s in the evidence and uh and I think I did try to be even-handed and objective but you know I wasn’t in the bag for anybody I had a you know I had an idea that this was had been a miscarriage of justice but um you know I think it was and I think that book shows it and as as does your work kind of like your books show us kind of pathologies not just in you know conspiracy thinking about the JFK assassination but just kind of more uh you know more specifically around the Garrison case so I I appreciate you having me and uh getting to be a part of this broader group of conversations uh with people who I also really admire and respect and learn from and um you know have fruitful discussions even if we don’t always agree and it’s great having you but when when could we expect your next book what is there a time frame so you know actually um I’m getting ready for the fall semester and I’m setting some deadlines for myself so I don’t get pulled Way Off Track and I’m hoping to have a first draft by you know like a year from now right um and these are it’s it’s not you know it’s not a book like uh cruising it’s not a you know it’s not like a 10 year inter um and so I’m hoping to kind of move through these at a at a faster clip um but it’s it’s a different kind of work for me so I feel like I have to produce a full um a full example out of the series uh in order to look for you know an agent and and then try to sell the longer Series so I you know I just I’ve talked to enough people in publishing to understand that because my track record is somewhere else that I have to produce the first uh book in the proposed series and and then go from there so I’m hoping in about a year I’ll have a draft full draft great I I can hardly wait it’s going to be a fantastic book I know it well you’re very kind and it’s it’s a lot of fun to talk to you always so yeah yeah you’re you’re amazing and so we’ll we’ll have more more discussions on Garrison we’ll have a panel discussion etc etc but thank you very much Alicia and we really really appreciate your tremendous work well that’s very kind of you and uh you know thanks so much I really appreciate it okay thank you very much
www.mattkprovideo.com/2024/07/05/delusion-episode-6-gus-russo/
On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 6, Gus Russo
http://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com
Music by: Power Music Factory Suspense Background Music No Copyright
Channel URL : / powermusicfactory
I want to thank everybody for coming this afternoon my name is Fred Litwin
noted author Fred Litwin and of course Fred is also the author of I was a teenage JFK conspiracy freak on the trail of delusion and Oliver Stones film flam at the demagogue of Dealey Plaza
Fred Litwin is here he’s a longtime author and certainly Watcher of politics
joining us uh Fred Litwin great to have you here thank you very
okay good evening welcome to another edition of on the trail of delusion the
my online podcast where we actually try to separate fact from fiction uh
the wheat from the chaff and actually give you something substantive on the web rather than the usual conspiracy nonsense that is all over the place
so welcome to another episode my guest today is Gus Russo a good friend of mine
and just an absolutely amazing investigative journalist so let me tell you a bit about Gus
For 30 years Gus Russo has been an investigative reporter author of nine non-fiction books writer and producer of many national and international documentaries for major networks
his books have received book of the month club and history book club featured elections and five of them have been option for films uh one of them the outfit was a Pulitzer nominee he’s written three books on the JFK assassination Brothers in Arms was his last book The kennedies the castros and the politics of murder um he’s also written where were you he is an expert on the JFK assassination he was a major investigator for the PBS Frontline documentary on Lee Harvey Oswald and so welcome to on the trail of delusion Gus Russo welcome to have you hey thank you Fred great to see you okay so speaking of on the trail of delusion I have to show you the shirt I wear Appo the flat Mars Society okay
right very very appropriate
okay
so my first question is you know what got you interested in the JFK assassination
well you know uh I’m old enough to uh report that I was alive when it happened
if you went through it especially as a a Catholic from a Catholic Family JFK was our first Catholic president our family worshiped the Kennedy’s and it was a bit it was quite uh a traumatic experience and there were some initial you know confusions about what happened obviously
in the fog of war and all that and they kind of I wrote I write about this in the introduction to live by the sword
some of the things that looked a little sketchy to me as a kid even but when the Warren Commission came out I think most people I fact I know most people pretty much accepted it I had this interest in it everybody you could not be interested in it it was an incredible event but the Warren Commission
I don’t know if you know this Fred but uh when it came out 80% of the American people actually believed it
you know
they bought the commission the report and I was probably one of them
but then a couple years later Mark Lane came out with rush to judgment
which really changed everything
as a young person never occurred to me that an attorney could write a book with all these misstatements and lies I thought
I thought it’s got to be true he wouldn’t be lying about this about the testimony of Jack Ruby or this or that and and the uh the murder of JD tippet and I said my God this guy you know he’s an attorney he’s got a real publisher and it was a big bestseller so that really got everybody going including me I was too young to do anything really firsthand but I was reading the books majored in polyi my career path was going to be music I was a musician since I was 13 and I’m professional playing teen centers and all that stuff and uh I minored in music at at College at University of Maryland and I majored in polyi
and after college I moved to New York to be a musician
but I was always interested in the case so some of the Bands I was in at the time were touring bands traveling all over pretty much the eastern half of the country especially New England so anytime I was in a town where there was some connection to the JFK case that’s where I became sort of you know an amateur gumshoe I would say oh Jim hosty lives here I’d call him up you know let’s have let’s have lunch you the day after our gig you know so it was more of a hobby uh but I was obsessed with I I I felt I think I learned early on that I had some ability to talk to people probably because when you’re a front man in a band you learn how to talk to an audience and the rhythm of how to communicate so um it came naturally to me uh so I was doing it like crazy I was building up a database of of people phone numbers and people all over FBI guys um uh Cuban Exiles what a CIA you know whatever and so um Along Comes The U I still living Upstate New York and then the house select committee happened and I was really aimed to be on the scene for that as much as possible so I would drive down or take a train down from upstate New York whenever they had an open hearing a public hearing and I was there for a lot of the big ones when they showed the zuder film when they with when they did the uh uh when they showed the U the the sound of the acoustics with the the BR film I was in the front row which was wrong I snuck in because that was where the Witnesses were supposed to sit I sat next to HB mlan and and you can see me in the footage of that day so I was there I got I spoke to Weiss and ashkenasi who were I mean I was crazy I I’d speak to anybody so after the thing was over I took them out went to lunch with Weiss and ashkanazi and picked their brains because I didn’t it it didn’t make sense to me the whole static filed tape with uh all this with alleged gunshots uh and I gave him you know a bit of a piece of my mind it wasn’t very wasn’t didn’t go down very well with him anyway during that period uh I became friendly with Scott Malone who uh was a DC uh private investigator and and reporter he worked for the New Times magazine and a few others maybe Mother Jones I can’t remember but we became friends and he introduced me to a lot of the staff of the hsca uh like Kevin Walsh and people like that uh so I was part of that it was a tighter Community back then it wasn’t a thousand millions or whatever of JFK researchers it was only a handful of us and we all sort of knew each other um and we very Cooperative we go over to Scott’s house after hearings and hang out with some of the staff and it was just a great time the only reason I mentioned all that is that that’s how the Frontline thing came to be because Scott Malone went from there to be one of the lead reporters for Frontline
when the show started in the early 80s and stayed with them for a long time so I continued my music work and my Private Investigations in 1988 I got a communication with from Jack Anderson who was doing a big special on the assassination who shot JFK and that was my first paid gig I sent him some of my phone numbers that I had for the show I was like a longdistance connection I didn’t I wasn’t out in the field with it but I sent him my some files and some phone numbers and uh that really got me interested in the documentary world I’m trying to get to a Frontline and so that’s my interest just by doing it for my own thing it wasn’t never pretended to be a money maker or any or a book or anything it was just my I had to figure out what this all about what made you sort of skeptical of the conspiracy stuff that you were you initially believed in well yeah uh the house committee I was I was really impressed with and I met some of these folks when I was there the um the scientists who did the uh the trajectory studies the ballistic studies I I came away okay Oswald shot him I knew that from the time of the committee done he did it but then there were big mysteries about what else was involved you know what who did somebody get him to do it did somebody know he was going to do it there was you have to understand that in the 70s and 80s the CIA was the big Bugaboo you know it they were in in the 70s it was all about killing foreign leaders allegedly or trying to and then in the 80s it was all about drug running uh you know working with the contras and uh the CIA was just this evil empire and so the question was did they what did they know and what were they covering up about this even though Oswald shot him in my opinion in my conclusion was what did the CIA know about Mexico what did they know uh you know about uh oswal allegedly being a fake Defector right all these things were swirling and it was all around the CIA so that for me the rest of my time was spent not investigating Oswald but investigating the CIA and stuff like that yeah yeah so that gets me up to around 1991 or 92 uh Scott Malone who was still working with Frontline said gosh we got to do something we should propose a show for the big anniversary 1993 and so we spoke to Mike Sullivan who ran who was the lead executive producer at Frontline and he loved the idea and uh he gave us a little discretionary funds to travel around and put together a proposal Scott and I and uh we put together after a couple months maybe three or four months actually Scott and I had a really nice proposal and we took it up to Boston for front line is headquartered and Mike loved it and he said well let’s let’s try to do something and um and Mike was great uh it wouldn’t have happened obviously without him and without him going to England and getting the be I think it was a BBC could be wrong about that but he got the britz to co-fund it because it was what we were going to do was really expensive Scott and I proposed that we would just travel the world and and figure we put more money in into it than the hsca did I mean it was a big budget and they went for it and I’m going oh my God this is like a researcher’s dream come true I’m going to be well paid I’ve got a ridiculous budget to go anywhere I want and interview everybody I could fly any all days notice I could go anywhere uh we Scott and I started it and the team expanded obviously we brought in Tony and Robin Summers also known as you really indefatigable uh workers when did you get the budget like how long did you have it how long a time did you have to research the JFK assassination you know it we started out slowly Scott and I it got serious and so it’s hard to Define it it was almost two years I’m sure first was Scott and I and then the team grew and that was about a year once maybe even a little longer than a year it was crazy it was I mean I didn’t have to get permission to do anything I just I had a my own Frontline credit card if I would to go to LA to interview somebody I just did it you know and sent them the bills and uh uh they trusted Scott and I and Tony and Robin I was going to say that uh Tony’s book uh conspiracy yeah was originally supposed to be entitled if I remember correctly was there conspiracy question mark and it was a book of questions to in in Tony’s defense it wasn’t supposed to be he was saying it was a conspiracy but he thought there was questions to be asked it was well researched and uh so Tony was on for a while he and Robin his wife who’s a great investigator and writer they did great work in in Russia for us they went to Moscow and Minsk they did all those interviews with the KGB uh they went to Mexico City Scott and I did all over the United States right and and Scott also went to Japan I mean Scott spent a month in Japan running down oswalt’s Connections in the queen bee club or whatever it was right and oh man that almost killed the budget because at the time uh the Japanese Yen and whatever the exchange rate was such that if you went out for a dinner it was $300 you know and if you took somebody to dinner it was 600 so right Frontline was getting all these receipts for oh he bought somebody an Apple for $20 and but that’s the kind of money they were willing to spend we came back from Japan with nothing right I mean1 $20,000 must have gotten spent just in Japan but we were committed to to do things nobody else had done and run down everything and that’s what people don’t understand about that show they think oh they set out this St I was well did it we were talking to every everybody 99% of whom didn’t make it into the final film right right but once we realized that it was Oswald That’s Mike said okay that’s our show we started out without saying that we said let’s look at everything and see where we land well that’s where we landed you know it’s I’d like to in a future show I really do want to talk to Anthony Summers about where he now stands on the J he’s gened a lot of uh a lot of stuff about the case over the years yeah he should be spoken spoken to you know it’s same with well I think the book he the title he originally wanted was called not in your lifetime which was his F which he eventually used for republishing but that’s what he really wanted but the publisher that no conspiracy is the way you’re going to sell a million books and you know he was right same with pner with case Clos that was the publisher suggestion I think Gerald told me I could be wrong about this that he thought it was a little arrogant to say case closed but the publisher said no no no you’ll sell 10,000 more books with that title so you know I could be wrong Gerald will correct me if I am but I I remember him telling me that so the Publishers have a say in how these books are marketed and and it does affect the the writer you know the author um he’s got to present it that way at that point that’s how we did it uh and uh and we interviewed so many people uh who didn’t make the show uh and those are some of the funnier crazier stories of beh we should do it behind the scenes front line let’s we should let’s talk about I mean it was it’s a terrific documentary I mean I really I’ve watched it many many times and you know it’s you know what always strikes me when watching something like that or reading your books for example is that it it’s real history as opposed to the when you read a conspiracy book it it reads differently because it’s it’s it’s it’s full of of conjecture and nonsense so it’s always a a pleasure to read Real History oh well thank you yeah watch a real documentary well you know I was sort of trained by some of the best people you know I worked with Sai Hirsch a lot I I worked with Tony Summers who’s a hard worker Ren Robin I worked with Frontline which is one every award you can win and they sort of gave us our marching orders and they told us here’s how you do it here’s how you corroborate uh who else have I jack Anderson who was an award-winning uh columnist in the US here um and these I was fortunate you know having to connect to DC that I had I uh uh met a lot of really you great reporters and investigators who sort of brought me in um to that World um I was just doing it as a hobby I just you know I’m sort of like a farest Gump in a way you know my whole life and so I just stumbled into these characters in DC and uh they said okay here’s how you do it you know and and so I did it and the other thing I like is is the doc injury is is on Lee Harvey Oswald it’s not focusing on you know the the medical evidence or you know there’s evidence of sick Shooters and it’s you know the all that crazy nonsense that right it’s it’s it’s very very interesting so tell us you know what what are some of the crazier stories from that time I mean you you met all all sorts of characters I mean for instance God Tosh plumbley for instance uh you know Tosh plumbley yeah I met TSH before Frontline um I mean I was one of the early ones maybe Gary Shaw was on to him before I was but uh Tosh is a character I the way I got into him was again my DC connections I think that Scott had introduced me to a guy named Jonathan Wier in DC who was the leite the chief Aid to Senator John Kerrey later became Secretary of State and they were fascinated with all this CIA uh drug running stuff and he Carrie did the carry report he worked on the Iran Contra report the CIA stuff in in Central America was the big thing in fact we all we all read this book I pulled this off the shelf you see this one uh yes yeah yeah yeah yeah this was like all about the CIA and a lot of drug smuggling 1981 and this is the first place plumley’s name is mentioned um and so when you mentioned you want to speak about him I remember this anyway I think car’s office must have read this book and they read everything and so they deposed plumbling at some point I got a call from Jonathan weiner said you want to come down to Washington senator wants to meet with you we have somebody who mentioned the Kennedy assassination during all of our interviews and maybe you’re the guy to talk to him so that’s where I learned about plumbley so I spoke to him called Plum he lived in Colorado at the time and uh he had the wild tale that you can look up everybody knows about flying in aort team into Dallas on the morning of the assassination he had a long history allegedly of uh helping the CIA run drugs and and he was involved in the Bay of Pigs supposedly just everything and um it got so intense with him that you know and I don’t want to say yet unbelievable but just off the- wall kind of stuff I brought him to Baltimore where I had just moved back to Baltimore from New York around 1989 and I I uh bought him an airline ticket I said let’s hang out for a few days so he came to Baltimore and he hang out he hung out with me for three or four days and uh I didn’t know what to make of it he um he had no corroboration for anything he came across as a little sketchy I learned a lot more later when I got his FBI file that he was arrested many times for forgery and fraud and and he had this flight plan that he gave me of the trip to Dallas which is probably in my papers at Baylor I don’t even have it anymore but with everybody’s name who was on the plane you know including Johnny roselli yeah Johnny roselli and I think aracha crazy things our teamate I can’t remember all the names but they were names who would never e Howard hunt eventually was one of them on the plate too anyway so um coule okay so we do the Frontline show I didn’t even utilize plumbley that but skip over that a couple years later a friend of mine from 60 Minutes a producer wanted to interview plumbley so uh because he wanted to do something explosive when the Kennedy cas so I brought him I brought him and this lady friend of mine Liz uh and this producer down to Miami we all flew to Miami he was going to set us up with all these Cuban Exiles and we were going to do extended interviews with plumbley and get all the details once and for all I still have about four or five hours of videotape of him in Florida uh telling us his story uh to cut to the chase it went nowhere uh uh there was you know it was that’s other thing you should know about that era was a lot of wasted money traveling around interviewing people who had ended up having nothing but um plumbley was just one of many uh I should point out that the one of the big things that got everybody interested in the CIA and Drug running was a Frontline show on the CIA and drugs it was produced by Olivia wild the actress uh her mother and father produced it or I know her mother did she was a reporter for Frontline Leslie Coburn so they had gotten into this whole Nexus from which plumbley came and um but I can’t it’s hard to remember any more deal details than that other than oh I remember I do remember one detail he showed us he said he was on the south null right yes when the assassination happened right so we got pictures of the South no and there ain’t nobody there it’s crazy well it’s amazing that he’s now in in in Rob riner’s podcast oh sure yeah it’s like it’s a new thing it’s new it’s only like 30 some years old and uh you know one of one of the one of the allegations was that uh you know plumbley was at nag Head North Carolina that’s the other one yeah of course with Oswald as part of this false Defector training or whatever oh it was the illusionary Warfare yes and in fact I got the memo I think that Mike Sullivan wrote for for you guys uh with you I published that about uh there was nothing in nag head there’s no facility in nag head you said Mike Selvin wrote a memo or so yeah or was or was it Mike solivan but there was a there probably two uh oh could you send me that please yeah it’s a great memo basically that that there’s there was there’s nothing in Naga R yeah we ran that all down we even knew o where Oswald was at that date I think he was in Minsk you know I mean I mean just incredible story and and uh but there it is in Rob riner’s podcast don’t get me started on the Rob Riner show oh my God we’ll be here for a year well the other another character like like Tosh Plum is a Gordon Novel you know Gordon Noel is another sort of character who has all these stories I knew Gordon I knew Gordon he called from time to time I met him in New Orleans uh and uh yeah same things it’s a good analogy uh a lot of stories no evidence and and a lot of ways to disprove it I can’t remember all the details these years later I do remember he sent me a patented invention of his a car engine that runs on water and of course that never happened Gordon what a character he was doing all sorts stuff like that and and and wow we I mean but again I mean people believe him you know and and I know there’s Richard case Nel is another one who told all sorts of stories I mean for some reason you know the J these JFK researchers are skeptical about everything but these guys come along with these ridiculous stories oh yeah that kind of makes sense the hobo the fake hobo oh chony chy oh I was dealing with H God there was one after another Oh Thomas Beckham well that get Scott and I went down to Louisville Louisville Kentucky what a great character I mean if you catch he’s a fraudster and he has a sense of humor about it he just thinks it’s the biggest joke in the world and everything he does is phony if you when you catch him on it he busts out laughing oh you got me that time Gus yeah just to tell our audience I mean Thomas Beckham was a character out of New Orleans uh who basically early days he was sort of a musician and that didn’t go anywhere but he decided to he was sort of into being a con man and so he would put on a concert some famous star is coming and of course Ricky Nelson he bring in a Ricky Nelson bring a somebody named Ricky Right somebody named Ricky Nelson and just rip off all the money and um and uh or for a while he wore a priest outfit trying to raise money for Cuba which he pocketed um so he had a history and of course he got entangled in the Garrison invest investigation and the funniest thing is he testified before the Garrison grand jury you could read his testimony online and it’s hysterical because first off he’s claiming he has all these degrees you know so I got a PhD in in anatomy he does I saw all those degrees in his storefront he Harvard Yale you name it you know he’s making it all up and at one time they wanted ask they asked him about the precept what what denomination are you and he he couldn’t answer the question I’m not really sure what Den what what denomination you know I’ll have to look it up when I get home well the important thing about Beckham is that you know there was this rumor going around in the 80s that there was a confession tape and with the hsca that’s what got us interested or me interested and uh I mean I got to such a point with my craziness and that I found a way to get a hold of some of those hsca tapes long before this stuff was all released uh don’t even asked me the details but I heard the confession tape long before anybody outside of the committee and uh and so I said to Mike SUV I said well this guy’s telling this wild story of uh knowing all about the conspiracy in New Orleans so he said go down and check him out so we Scott and I flew down to Louisville and it we had a great time I mean it was another big waste of money but we had a blast with this guy uh his his little storefront was like on Main Street or whatever it was downtown Louisville uh with the whole wall was every wall was filled with fake diplomas he was trying to sell me some Gus where where do you want to graduate from he had Harvard Rings want to gra you want a Harvard classroom and then he tried and he was a musician right or he thought you know he played guitar and he said yeah I wrote that song From a Jack to a King I said no you didn’t I knew who wrote it right I said no I’ll tell you who wrote it Tom and he said oh you got me we bust that laughing so we got out the guitars somewhere there’s a tape recording of me and him jamming for most of the afternoon because when he testified and he actually he test after he told that crazy confession story they actually deposed him uh the hsca deposed them and he told the the hsca that he had he had more degrees than a thermometer well he had them laughing didn’t he I mean they were once the once once they got on to the degrees and he was saying well yeah you know I’m I’m I I could practice uh surgery and whatever and a I’m a brain surgeon and and then they realized okay this is this is we have to end this interview because it’s just nonsense you know that was the end they realized it but yet he goes on and Joan melon bought all the stories made him the central character in her book it’s crazy uh he uh he signed some a some pictures for me I think at the time he was gone by the name Wade Hampton uh and I still got those pictures somewhere uh he showed me the Ricky Nelson poster and it was great it it showed uh uh sort of a blackout image uh profile of a guy playing guitar you couldn’t tell who it was but all around it had all Ricky Nelson’s hits Traveling Man all the different hits and it said hear him sing all the hits and he did thing all but it wasn’t the same Ricky Nelson some fun what’s interesting is he had for a while I I put on I have online I found in the files Bob lavender was this guy who was a I guess a print manager ran a print shop in Seattle was his manager for a while and Bob lavender was the guy sort of I guess maybe introduced them to Fred Chrisman because for a while Chrisman and uh another con man Chrisman and Beckham were working together as a con right a variety of schemes and then Chrisman of course was also the target of Jim Garrison I mean it just it the whole thing gets so crazy right it it just you you can’t make this stuff up and yet people still talk about these guys yeah I know it’s amazing they’re still talk when I saw that on the Riner show that he brought up plumly I said oh my God where’s this guy been you
know so so so getting back to to to front line I mean you have a lot of crazy stories but but you actually you did an amazing amount of work and and tell us of course everything LED back to Lee Harvey Oswald yeah and so so tell us a bit about Oswald and what you found out and you you talked to everybody from I’m sure the Ruth pain to oh yeah we film we filmed Ruth we filmed everybody I spoke to Jean de Mor Shield Jean I can’t remember how she pronounced it but she was Ill she was in California at the time we wanted to get her on the show uh now we spoke like I said uh 90% or more of the people we spoke to didn’t even make it on the show there was just not enough time in the world but we wanted to I mean I we were on fire I was doing eight interviews a day sometimes I mean it was and Scott was off doing his and we were filing reports um it’s crazy but um we interviewed for for instance Jay Walton Moore the CIA guy who lived in Dallas who all these conspiracy Notions were about him running Oswald or some nonsense and he was a great guy I interviewed um another guy who didn’t make it on the showed Ed Walker Edwin Walker I interviewed him well on the phone I interviewed him I didn’t go to his house but uh it didn’t work out because he was kind of out of it uh there’s a funny story there but you don’t have time um uh I interviewed Walker we interviewed just about everybody we nobody was off limits you know we gave everybody the opport to make their case and um I’m trying to think of U I’m looking at some I scribbled down some names here U oh John Thomas Mason the oswal look alike I spent an afternoon at a barbecue with him great guy what he was not well Charles steel who handed out the the pist we interviewed Charles he didn’t want to go on camera uh one of the tramps we we found out who the tramps were before it was made public I think because Jim lvll had been keeping those police records Secret in his own house and I was good friends with Jim and he said go I’ll tell you who the tramps really were he brought down the file I think one or two of them had passed away I interviewed the family of one one was in Florida and they described the whole thing oh yeah they just a bunch of friends got together once a year and they would ride the trains and you know the family had no idea that this guy was mistaken for E Howard hunt they said really my father was he how so we ran down the tramps and they never made it into the show we never even talked about it because it was a waste of air time how about can you tell us a bit about the the picture of David ferry in Oswald yeah yeah well I I was pretty much living in New Orleans during that show I was back and forth so much uh that was one of my main territories New Orleans and Dallas with side jumps everywhere um and um one of the first people I went to see was Colin HR uh who was in The Civil Air Patrol with Oswald one of the first first people I think I spoke to down no no it’s Ed Butler first Inca and then Colin so I went to the library the New Orleans Public Library where Colin worked and I I walked up to the third floor and there he was in the science division or whatever he was in and he was very nice guy and he said yeah i’ be happy to talk to you about I remember Oswald and and and so we spoke and U he said oh you might want to go down to the first floor Carlos koga’s wife works down there I said okay and then I went to see Carlos koga’s wife and and she set me up with Carlos and also there was a third person working in the library this is my first day on the job down there and I’m thinking this is really a small town you know you spend a day there and you meet everybody you can see how and right away I could see how Garrison could create any conspiracy theory he wanted to because everybody knew everybody you know it was a really small town and this is in ’92 and 93 I can only imagine how small it was in 1963 and of course everybody was running from Garrison to the FBI and from the FBI to the Garrison I mean back and forth yeah yeah I mean it was you know the thing I and so Colin speaking of the getting back to the photo again this is I can digress Forever on this stuff but uh I started talking to I had the FBI report of all the Civil Air Patrol guys with who were with Oswald at the time and allegedly fairy there’s an FBI Report with names them all and I looked them up and called them up knocked on their doors when I must have spoken to a dozen of them and it became clear some they didn’t want to talk they were still in fear of being involved in this story The Garrison thing is really strange um people don’t know that a lot of people who were connected to Oswald in any way we’re living in fear of the terror of Jim Garrison you know I don’t want to talk to you is Garrison involved in this oh geez you know when I called Sergio aracha Smith first thing do you work for Garrison I said Noh Sergio in fact I think he did Garrison just die at that point I can’t remember I said no we don’t work for Garrison I must have said that a half dozen times to people when I called them up they were nervous about this guy so the Civil Air Patrol kids who were adults by this point they um they were the same way some of them didn’t want to talk because of Garrison and I convinced some of them eventually and they said well okay being you’re a good guy you’re not working with Garrison yeah oswal was there one of the Biv wax and uh we we did have a picture floating around and blah blah blah I said oh I said got to get the picture we leaned on them and kept asking them well I don’t have it I’m I’m sure some of them had it some of the ones who said they didn’t uh and I the another guy said I had it but I destroyed it you know um and when Garrison came on the scene so it was hard to track it down eventually it led to a guy John sirolo I guess something like that and I when I found that out I called the people up at Frontline because srao I I don’t care remember if he wanted to be paid for it or whatever we weren’t allowed to pay anybody so I called Mike Sullivan and Ben Lerman was another one of our lead producers on this project and then Ben contacted srao who wasn’t living in Louisiana at the time and he made the deal I don’t know if it was we got it for free I still don’t know the details on that or whether he paid him something but uh they made the final thing to get the photo based on what these cap guys were telling me in in New Orleans uh that he had it uh so that’s how it came about we even had a big press conference at the national Press Club in DC about that photo and about the fingerprints on the rifle that we had uncovered that had that Waring commission never saw we got them from Rusty Livingstone the cop he sent us the uh the his original highdefinition photos of the prince on the trigger guard fresh prints and we had the hsca fingerprint we hired him to look at them and he said this is unbelievable if I had had this to the hsca days it would have been great but um so we had this press conference where we announced the photo at the same time we didn’t pretend that the photo meant anything we said here’s this photo that the hsca had been looking for there’s Ferry there’s Oswald everybody in the photo said that we interviewed them said that U Oswell and Ferry never had any communication you know Ferry was only there by fluke he occasionally went to these Biv whacks oswal only went to one or two meetings because his mother wouldn’t let him and she eventually completely stopped him from going so he was rarely there it wasn’t like they were Civil Air Patrol buddies they just happened to be there at the same day had no interaction and we said that at the press conference it was kind of weird because we said we got this breakthrough photo but it doesn’t mean anything right I think I think even John Cavolo said that he doubted that that uh Ferry would have remembered him and he took the picture yeah oh yeah yeah um and I went out to moan airport and interviewed Fair’s friends there and a bunch of people and you we we we ran down the fairy story really hard and obviously there was nothing there um and um I spoke to Sergio aracha he became a really good friend he he was in Miami and he opened up a lot of Cuban Exile doors for me and he told me all about Ferry and it was a consistent story you know he was just a victim of Garrison and uh the whole thing was that Garrison came up with was fantasy and it destroyed a lot of people that’s there’s a sad part to this I mean I’m convinced that Garrison is what caused ferry to have a stroke or you know whatever it was um uh and um caros Springer’s wife had a miscarriage from the stress of all this Clay Shaw David Ferry died uh Clay Shaw eventually died after the from the stress of all this there’s a there’s a lot of trail of bodies behind Jim Garrison aracha lost his job in ARA lost his job oh it was just he was a a sick guy Jim Garrison and um he destroyed people’s lives not even connected to the Kennedy case he had a history of inditing enemies and destroying them um you know and I asked I think it was who was the musician L Martin Lon Marts I asked Leon Martins I said why did you people keep voting for him for for Garrison and he and and Al Bobo they said in unison well he was good entertainment he was colorful you know I said great you know uh but um that was their excuse for electing this guy to Da but he was a bad bad guy I never saw so many people harmed by one guy at that point in my life and um so there you go so going back to you mentioned Leighton Martins I mean one of the things that fascinated me was that you know uh for a while Martins lived with David Ferry they were they were friends in New Orleans yeah but you had a you had a meeting with with Leighton Martins Morris brownley and Alba buff they were all friends of David Ferry um can you tell us about that and their thoughts about Oliver Stones JFK oh well they they they laughed at it pretty much I remember uh I I had more than one meeting I had a lot of meetings with those guys there’s a photo in my first book with all of us having dinner but no I spent a lot of time with them I remember Leighton called me that they all went to see the premiere of it New Orleans together those guys right and and Leighton called me as they were coming out of the movie theater and he said it was unbelievable he said we didn’t even recognize Jim Garrison in the movie he said that was nothing like him it would they he said we were laughing it was so opposite of the truth they thought it you know if it wasn’t so tragic it would have been funny but yeah I remember him calling me the night he saw it and said he was unrecognizable as Jim Garrison you know Kevin cner as Jimmy Stewart kind of you know every man whatever uh that wasn’t the guy they knew uh so and that was pretty much everybody’s opinion down there Rosemary James and everybody they they just couldn’t believe what they were seeing yeah they uh in fact I remember that um Harry conik Senor had met with Oliver Stone before they made he told me he said you know they came to New Orleans he and cner and one of the producers and they came to my office and he told them everything he said you’re crazy for doing this uh you you got it all wrong and and um Oliver Stone said thanks and left and did it anyway I mean he was well warned that you know that’s the thing that he was wrong about Garrison Stone needed obviously he needed a protagonist to hang this complicated story on the Kennedy assassination and so I could see in one way why he could do it through Garrison but not through Garrison as the hero you know as the anti-hero I understood as a as a having written some screenplays you need that you need a central character and I think there’s also psychological thing Oliver Stone is pretty much an outsider in Hollywood like a black sheep in a lot of ways he sort of likes that big you know I’m the little guy against all the big studios and Jim Garrison was the same thing in New Orleans he was the black sheep of New Orleans another of the other attorneys or you know people respected him and he ident they identified with each other I think as being you know the White Knight against all the big forces you know and uh so I think there was some bonding over that between the two of them and um so you know stone is very much like that um he he uh he does controversial things and he’s hard it’s hard to get his movies funded because of that reason he can’t I don’t think he’s got anything big made in Forever uh because uh you know I think I think the JFK thing helped him in the short run but in the long run hurt his career you know I who knows but um you know I could tell you a lot of stories about because I was down in in Dallas and New Orleans when they were film fing and uh the movie JFK and there’s a lot of stories there that aren’t fit for public consumption just right not just not good stuff you know so so getting back to just Sergio aracha Smith and Carlos Binger and Carlos Koga I mean those were three anti-castro Cubans who were living in New Orleans who uh basically were targets of Jim Garrison who were sort of was trying to put pressure on them to come up with stories about Lee Harvey Oswald yeah and and and of course Garrison painted Oswald as this right- Winger uh who putting on a a fake Act of being being a a Marxist yeah so what are what are your thoughts about you know bringier and aracha and and uh Koga well these are people who came out of Cuba these were Cuban Exiles who hated Fidel with a passion uh and some of them not not aracha but some of the Exiles hated Kennedy because of the Bay of Pigs right and uh I don’t I I know aracha didn’t hate Kennedy in fact he was one of the few who knew that the kennedies were their friends not their enemies the kennedies to the larger Exile community in Miami especially had abandoned them they were traitors to the Cuban cause arachin knew differently because he knew Bobby Kennedy and was sort of in that uh pipeline of information from was actually feeding information from New Orleans about Cuban Exile stuff that was going on he was helping plan the next Invasion that was going to happen they were sending Exiles down to Central America to train aracha was part of that pipeline so he was very close to Bobby Kennedy went up to Hickory Hill a number of times so the very guy that Garrison is after one of them was actually Pro Kennedy working in this very secret operation uh and he’s accused of killing you know a JFK which is ludicrous and as you know Garrison eventually thought Bobby Kennedy was in on killing his brother because Bobby Kennedy had Walter Sheridan spying on him or something so did did AR catcha give you the impression of being a gangster type uh person who would who or or a killer oh my God not just the opposite he was the most uh discreet gentlemanly guy always dressed to a tea uh and wore suit beautiful suits and ties and he was a diplomat and he came across as a as a diplomat and no no no he you have to meet these people to realize and right away all these theories go out the window soon as you just say hi to them uh aracha and his family were just the sweetest family his his wife and I met his kids and they stayed friends for a while aracha gave me box fulls of his things his family sent me things after he passed away I mean one of the things he gave me was um I still have it hanging on my wall there’s a few pictures of me with him but he he went up to to um Hickory Hill when Garrison was after him it’s in my First Book Live By The Sword and he um said Bobby will you help me get out of this and Bobby said it wouldn’t be right for me politically to make a statement about a DA and sorry I can’t help you but he said and this this did make aracha mad he said but here take please have this as a momento and he gave him a PT 109 tie clip which aracha gave to me and I’m hanging on my wall here in a frame um and uh so there were some hard feelings about that not being helped by the kennedies after all he had done for the kennedies but um he knew the kennedies hadn’t given up on Cuba and not all the Exiles knew that that’s an important thing bring air uh he may have been more right-wing in terms of um you know thinking the kennedies had abandoned them uh but he was anything but you know an assassin or an Oswald guy uh he introduced me to everybody in New Orleans all the other Exiles like kog and different people and um uh you know he was just hurt by like everybody else he was hurt by gison you know and um now these were good people and it’s hard to communicate that to PE folks who won’t go and meet people you can’t do it on the internet right yes and and and it’s too late now because so many people are gone and the conspiracy theories just flourish um and a great example is um de brues Warren De brues right the FBI agent he was accused of all kind of cover up in New Orleans right and about Oswald and I went down to meet with him great guy just the nicest guy and um he said we had a great conversation about the whole case at the end I said well I have to ask you are you aware that you’re accused of covering up osworld and you know it was a moment I’ll never forget he got real sad and he with he whole demeanor changed and he said Gus let me tell you he said you know I’m an Irish Catholic JFK was Irish Catholic he said I worshiped the ground He Walked on he said we all did most a lot of the FBI were Irish Catholics in those days um and he said I’d have turned over and A Tear came to his eye he said I’d have turned over every stone in this city if I could have found out who killed him yeah you understand I said yeah I think I understand I’m sorry to even bring it up you know really emotional stuff that you don’t get online well it’s it it it it really is incredible how the conspiracy theorists will almost there a whole cast of characters who are treasonous you know all these FBI CIA people they’re all oh they do they all hated Kennedy they’re all wanted to kill him um they’re all guilty of treason without ever talking to any of these people and seeing you know they what they felt you know I went all over the dullas thing as you saw in my first book I went to New Mexico and interviewed his sister and and some other family relatives and I went to Miami and interviewed his friends D’s friends down there I went to the library in New Jersey where they had his papers uh that’s the complete opposite of the truth the kennedies and dullas were as tight as you can be he was like a grandfather to Bobby Kennedy they looked up to him so much that’s why Bobby put him on the Warren Commission you know to protect the Kennedy’s interest and Jackie and Dallas loved each other they were trading James Bond books all the time um and uh I mean it’s just crazy just as crazy as saying aracha was involved as saying Dallas was involved I mean and no JFK didn’t in a fit of anger fir dullas after the bad pigs dullas came in and offered to resign and B Jack said no I need you and but he said no the thing is Dallas wanted to retire Jack begged him to stay on for a while during his administration so it wasn’t like I don’t want to be fired he would he would love to have been fired he wanted to retire so he went in and said Jack you know uh you know I was I wanted to retire this is I gotta leave you I I’ll take on the blame for this and this shouldn’t come on you and uh uh Ken said no don’t do that Allan eventually four or five months later uh when the heat was getting so bad Kennedy said all right maybe you should retire you maybe you should leave just read the oral histories at the Kennedy Library from Dulles from Bobby Kennedy about how conial and and gentlemanly the whole thing was it wasn’t like I hate Kennedy because he fired me that’s the complete opposite of what happened um anyway I could go on it’s it’s ludicrous you know well you see the same thing with a lot of sort of uh former CIA agents you’ve talked to a lot of CIA people um and uh you see a lot of lot of all of them are you know David Atley Phillips for example yeah yeah how many books is he in where he’s guilty of killing uh being involved in the assassination have you ever seen the letter from his son dley Philip’s son DAV David Jr he wrote a letter to I I to Dale Meers it’s I might have a copy I think it’s on Dale’s website um where he says what this did to our family this these crazy accusations you know speaking of interviewing CIA people I joined apio The Association of Former Intelligence Officers which really ought to spark a lot of conspiracy theories about me but the truth is a CIA guy told me he said gsh you know you can join this organization I said how I’m not an intelligence officer they said well we have this associate member thing hardly anybody knows about if I sponsor you in it was Ned Dolan he said if I sponsor you you can join us at all our luncheons I said well I’d be crazy not to and and I was the only journalist at the time who did it U so I’d go to these luncheons where three or 400 CIA guys all the cream of the crop in the 90s they were all still alive shackley and Helms Colby um Nester Sanchez the case officer for for kbella we were having lunch four times a year together and uh I did this as a journalist to get to know these people so they trust me to have interviews and I did I got interviews with all of them some off the Record uh n Sam Halper and he was part of this for 10 years I did this uh and and um we would go to Fort Meyers in in uh near DC and uh beautiful big ballroom and they even asked me to speak before the group it was so funny they asked me to present my First Book Live By The Sword to The Association of Former Intelligence Officers which I did and uh uh it was so funny because I’m looking down at the tables and there’s all these guys who know much more about this than me I made a joke about it I said I think I opened up by saying well the good news is I won’t have to explain to you who Alan dullis is like I do at a library the bad news is you know more about it than me and they all laughed they were very good to me they they they uh did anybody confess to you that they killed Kennedy privately I mean off the Record there was confession line no uh uh but you know Nester Sanchez told me among many people told me that Bobby knew about the amales operation and at the time it was off the Record uh nestor’s deceased now uh and uh uh a number of other people you know told me things that I could never use uh at the time uh who else um Elden Rudd of the FBI you know he was in Mexico City right and he wouldn’t tell me anything on the record and he told me a lot about Mexico City that I wish I could have put in the book but uh um it let me know that I was on the right track you know one of the things I remember asking Elden Rudd was he was in the American embassy as a leat the FBI legal atach and I he was he was out west too maybe Phoenix can’t remember I called him up and I said uh you we’re doing this show and uh he said I I don’t want to be involved I said can I ask you one maybe it was a book I was asking him for my first book and I said can I ask you one question yes or no and I said if I was to say in my book or in my writing that there was more to Mexico City especially regarding Cubans and oswal would I be right he said you’d damn well be right he said that’s all I’ll say and even that I couldn’t print but that that let me know I was on the right track right right very important yeah so that’s the kind of stuff you get that you can’t use but gives you the fire to keep moving in that direction he wasn’t asking for money like they always say oh they want to be famous he didn’t want to be famous he wanted to be retired in wherever he was Scottdale or whatever so it had the Ring Of Truth one other person I should ask you about the CIA Bill Harvey so did did did he confess to you or did you know told us about Bill Harvey well he was deceased by the time I got really into this spoke to his widow right I spent two days with her a house in Indianapolis I think it was Indianapolis there’s so many cities I can’t remember but I think it was Indianapolis he she was there uh CG Harvey uh his nephew who sort of ran the estate uh she was wonderful I mean but she hated Bobby Kennedy oh as did Bill uh no doubt about it he hated Bobby Kennedy didn’t hate Jack he and he wasn’t a murderer Bill Harvey wasn’t a murderer it’s funny in their big living room in Indianapolis there was a stuffed Mongoose right and I wish I really wanted to get this I begged them for it and it had a sash around it it said Robert F Kennedy man I wanted that she gave me a a copy of Harvey’s his copy of the church report which had all his Source his notes in the margins which some of the pages I duplicated in my first book Harvey had his issues he was a drinker uh he like many CIA people he thought Bobby Kennedy was weigh in over his head which he was with these Cuban operations he there’s an anecdote in my first book lived by the sord of where Bobby Kennedy shows up at the CIA station in Hemstead the JM wave Bobby just shows up unannounced and uh starts tearing uh confidential or top secret teletypes off the machine rips them off and Harvey says what the hell are you doing he said I’m taking these out of here and so these CIA guys are going nuts you know you can’t do this so that was part of the problem Bobby and Bobby later admitted it he knew he was you know in over his head with all this stuff he didn’t know about discretion and and how to run these things and it made a lot of people upset because they had to follow his orders and yeah there was problems but it wasn’t like let’s kill Ken JFK it wasn’t that kind of thing at all you know well you know look you know in can me there’s lots of politicians don’t like but I’m not going to kill them I mean it’s just and and they didn’t dislike Jack they they had a big problem with Bobby yeah because he was the one going to CIA headquarters every day after work at the justice department and Dick Helms used to tell me all the time about we I used to walk into his car from the AIO luncheons and he would just tell me horror stories about Bobby coming to the to the uh to Langley and just yelling at everybody and not knowing what he was doing you know and they just sort of said yes Bobby you know yes Bobby because they worked for him you know and uh so yeah it was it was just like a Keystone Cops at times you know and the CIA didn’t really want these operations they were told to do them you know and you witness the fact that after the kennedies were out of office all this stuff went away if the CIA wanted to kill Castor they’ have kept doing it this was White House stuff right right you know and same with Eisenhower and the that came Eisenhower the White House ran most of these big operations the CIA guys demanded what they called higher authority for any big operation because their careers were on the line so they always got it and very often the higher authority ordered ordered it Eisenhower ordered Iran overthrow Guatemala I highly recommend to your viewers get a book called The Declassified Eisenhower the truth about the golf playing grandfatherly Ike he was really proactive the as were the kennedies and the CIA they job is to follow the directives of the White House whether they like it or not and anyway that’s you know digression but that’s what you get from knowing these people okay look we’ve gone a little over an hour I don’t we’re not going to get we don’t have time to get into your the main Crux of of brother brothers in arms which is you which is fine it’s worthy of a complete show on its own just briefly before we end this episode can you tell us a bit about JFK’s foreign policy uh the conspiracy theorists would tell us that his foreign policy was one of rapmon uh with the Soviets and the Cuba he was going to exit Vietnam um he was going to bring in a new era of peace to the world and that’s why he had to be killed so could you speak a bit to that my God where do I start uh let’s see number one his reproach M the the peace speech at American University was aimed at Cru they were on good terms with each other they actually respected each other a lot witnessed what happened after the assassination how destroyed cruff was uh and Cru je was put under house arrest so all our hopes were gone Kennedy was killed cruff was destroyed uh those two if they had have lived and stayed in power everything would have been different I think however um uh Cru Jeff uh Kennedy gave the speech aimed at Moscow it was not ever aimed at Cuba that was uh called his bone in the throat he could never he and Bobby could never you know disabuse themselves of the uh uh I don’t know they they they were embarrassed by the Bay of Pigs and it never left them Castro traveled around the world after the Bay of Pigs was you know after he won the Bay of Pigs invasion He travel the world embarrassing the kennedies making speeches they’re cretans they’re cretans and they’re cretans and they and the kennedies just couldn’t take it um so um anyway um there was no rap ront with Cuba ever during the Kennedy years it just shifted from Eisenhower had the mob doing it Eisenhower’s CIA and uh Bobby got the Cuban Exiles he got a few Cuban loyal Cubans who were in on this uh to uh continue the operations and uh so what was the rest of your question uh Fred beyond the well the the fact that you know I think Cuba is a main thing the fact that they they really were were were very very dedicated uh they wanted to get rid of Castro they that was their their their number one goal in that and that uh conspiracy theorists misunderstand things like operation Northwoods right which really came out of out of operation Mongoose right I was the first person in my first book to write about it because uh as I was researching my first book in 1997 is when the califano papers were released and Northwoods is in that cache of 200 uh pages of documents or 300 I can’t remember but uh Northwoods was a part of it I referred mostly to the part of it called op plan 380 which was a new Invasion plan uh and I talked about that but I got I think I was the first one of the first people to get my hands on those documents and uh you know it had nothing to do with Killing Kennedy I mean I just don’t get the connection that they’re making uh you know uh in fact same with with Vietnam and all that lunacy Kennedy uh was a hawk you have to understand the 1964 election was looming and the Republicans were going to use all this against Kennedy especially Cuba and Castro 90 miles offshore and Kennedy had to show that he was strong on these things and uh hence he was trying to remove Castro before the election in my opinion that’s what it was all about and um with Vietnam he put the troops in there first he uh escalated the whole thing a lot of it pressure was coming from his own father because there was the Catholics and the the um in Vietnam who were being persecuted the the monks were emulating themselves on the streets and uh this was a personal thing too but at any rate um I caught up Kennedy’s uh head of sinpac at the time uh or um who was in charge of his Vietnam operation brute krulac Victor VI krak I think his name was brute and I called him up and I said I gotta find out was he pulling out of Vietnam you were in charge of it and uh he laughed he said Gus how old were you when Kennedy was killed I said 13 He said uh well you knew as much about what to do in Vietnam as we did and he said here’s exactly what he told me he said on Wednesday Kennedy was thinking of pulling out on Thursday he was thinking of escalating right and on Friday he was going to pull out again he said he didn’t know what to do he whatever the wind blew uh it was an intractable situation uh once the first blood was shed in Vietnam Everything Changes in Warfare It’s called the tripwire effect because then you can’t pull out because how do you justify these first Dead GIS to their families if you say oh was a big mistake and you you’re caught up by that point and once the trip wire had been hit uh there was no getting out of it and it was one of the great tragedies of the 20th century was Vietnam and Kennedy um and yeah I read a lot about it I can’t give you all the details in a short amount of time but there is no doubt uh he was going to stay in Vietnam if not escalate Johnson didn’t want to have anything to do with it but Kennedy’s cabinet stay with Johnson for a transition and they said oh Lyndon you don’t know as much about politics in Asia as we do uh and Johnson thought it was a bad idea and they convinced him he didn’t know what he what he thought and he said okay if you if if mcnamar and you guys know more than me let’s do it and he regretted that to the day he died that he kept Kennedy’s cabinet because had it not been for Vietnam his presidency would have been amazing yeah absolutely Vietnam destroyed his presidency and it was Kennedy’s cabinet who told him what to do uh oh it was it was tragedy on top of tragedy we could G for a year about that you know but anyway um one I guess the the funniest person we should talk about before we go is uh Fletcher proudy yeah I had one or two interactions with Fletch I I went to his house I think he was living in Virginia and uh uh it was one of those things that you didn’t waste too much time on you know you may know more about him than I did I of course he wrote uh uh his book The Secret team so he had to be spoken to but again it’s a guy with a theory with with no corroboration for any of it his big thing was that milit that book The Iron Mountain yes which he thought was real it was fic yeah it was fic it was it was it was like a hoax yeah it was a hoax and so I think when I found that out I said okay check please done with BR you know and and and interestingly um as everybody sort of Knows by now that’s the Donald Southern car character in E and JFK the ex- character and of course proudy never met with Garrison like that that was all fiction uh and and uh that’s the other thing with Oliver Stone that he bought on to that Fletcher proudy stuff at all it’s uh yeah $45 million wasted yeah and and I mean Fletcher proudy was was was a horrific anti-semite oh yeah that’s true I forgot about that yeah I mean my God he he was going he was writing for I mean he presented at one of the uh cardo uh the the intern the one of the Holocaust denal conferences I mean it’s just it’s just unbelievable wow Mark Lane didn’t mark Lane marry Willis cardo’s daughter well he was Mark Lane was also part of that crowd in facte for a while was the anti-zionist uh editor of one of the Publications a je a Jewish lawyer working for the anti-semites crazy I remember going through your papers at Baylor and I I found a memo uh uh to Oliver Stone about Fletcher proudy saying you know look we have we have an issue here oh yeah you know there’s stuff I think that was Jane rone wrote that letter right his head of research was trying to warn him about that you know this is this is really serious I’ve looked into this and and it’s actually true you know there there there’s it’s really bad yeah and it was uh that you I Stone hired me for a minute before I knew I didn’t I never had the script he wouldn’t but he he knew my he knew my work for some reason and uh uh no actually I had written him years before that he should do a Kennedy assassination movie Back in 88 long before we could blame you you mean it’s I may have been the first person but I think he always wanted to do it but he liked that I showed the kind of work that i’ done I to write the script and he flew me out there and and I thought my my day had come in this is around 1990 or something and I thought my my ship had come in and uh uh he said no no I’m doing something different he said but I want you I want you to help me because you you know where everybody is I had all these phone numbers that’s a great story so he I I did hang around on the scene in Dallas in New Orleans and if you needed to contact like Buelle Frasier or somebody I said I’ll call up you I know him and that was my connection to this thing but there’s a great story there which we you don’t have time for probably but uh uh all the people who uh Stone wanted to meet and the deal was he promised them dinner with Kevin Costner that that never happened oh Kevin got
sick there’s so many great stories about that movie we’ll we’ll talk about a whole separate hour sometime
okay
that’d be great
well look I think we’re going to end it here because U going on to brothers in arms
and yeah Cuba and Mexico City those are big topics
very important topics
which I really want to get to because your stuff on Cuba is the best around
it’s very important part of the case that nobody really discusses or I should say
they discuss but they get it all wrong and yeah
thank you for that yeah
it was so sad they did they just didn’t really read that book they you just skimmed it
and I’ll give you for the next thing
I will reveal uh one the name the real name of one of our sources the Oscar character in uh and I’m prepared to uh tell you more about him
he was one of our great sources on Oswald in Cuba he had the Oswald file he was a G2 guy and
there’s a great footnote on what happened to him
and who he really was
so there’s a teaser great oh that’ll be a great future episode when we really get into Cuba in a in a big big way so Gus thank you very much uh oh thank you friend always is fun talking to you and uh we’ll be in touch soon thank you very much yep thank you [Music] [Applause] [Music]
Military Laws Broken: Top Gun (with real JAG)
mattkprovideo.com/2022/07/04/military-laws-broken-top-gun/
The LegalEagle is American YouTuber Devin Stone.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devin_Stone
stonelawdc.com/
JFK Truth Be Told, New Orleans Meet Up, April 2022
mattkprovideo.com/2022/06/04/jfk-truth-new-orleans-meet-up/
These are “home movies” of the “JFK Truth Be Told” Facebook group in person meetup on April 22, 2022. Author Fred Litwin was going to be there to research his new book on Jim Garrison, and we wanted to be there to see some of the Lee Harvey /Jim Garrison related sites.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/553546571932211
The first shot is the bridge leading into New Orleans.
A church on the road into New Orleans.
.28) some shots of the apartment house that Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina Oswald used to live in. Mixed in are some shots from the house from an old tv interview with Oswald’s former landlady.
1.42) an unrelated but amusing shot of some tree cutters engaging in some dangerous seeming actions.
2.04) The nearby neighborhood library where Lee Harvey Oswald checked out books on Kennedy among others.
2.27) Shots of our visit to Reilly Coffee where Oswald worked and the “suspiciously nearby” Federal Buildings. This footage is out of chronological context, but I liked how it fit into the old interview.
Note, Lee Harvey Oswalds’ alleged “mistress” charged people for a similar tour of New Orleans sites two months after our ours. This women is probably telling the truth about working at the Reilly Coffee Company at the same time as Oswald, but she also tells very difficult to believe series of stories about her being the girlfriend of the married Oswald, and even more difficult to believe stories about her being in a CIA bio-weapons program with Oswald, David Ferrie and Guy Bannister.
What counts towards her credibility is the fact the the people, places and events in her stories match up almost exactly with the stories written about in Jim Garrisons book “On The Trail of the Assassins.” What counts AGAINST her credibility is the fact that the the people, places and events in her stories match up almost exactly with the stories written about in Jim Garrisons book “On The Trail of the Assassins,” even the parts that a lot of researchers don’t believe ever happened. To her critics, its almost like she read “On The Trail of the Assassins” and imagined herself into the book.
http://www.jfk-online.com/judyth-story.html
http://www.jfk-assassination.net/judyth.htm
3:00 shots of us visiting the corner where Lee Harvey Oswald handed out “Hands off Cuba” Leaflets.
3.33 Visiting Lafayette square. Where Oswald attended a political rally and had a PO box.
4.27 Looking for Jim Garrisons gravesite and accidentally finding Carlos Marcellos Tomb.
http://www.findagrave.com/memorial/6333088/jim-garrison
5:07 David Ferries Apartment.
5:59 finding David Ferries grave. Tiny compared to Jim Garrisons.
http://www.findagrave.com/memorial/7067544/david-william-ferrie
6:25 Clay Shaws apartment.
http://www.nola.com/entertainment_life/article_add75852-51ee-5d7e-8446-a8c1c6c0643c.html
6:35 New Orleans courthouse where the Clay Shaw trial happened. NOTE: I shot this footage on an earlier trip to New Orleans, this wasn’t a part of the “Truth Be Told” meet up.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Clay_Shaw
mattkprovideo.com/2022/03/28/dealey-plaza-1997/
Here is a blast from (my) past!
I shot this footage with a hand held Standard Definition (SD) BetaCam ENG camera ( 640 by 480, 29.97 Frames Per Second) on December 21st, 1997.
This was originally going to be a part of a “The Kennedy Assassination was a conspiracy” documentary I was going to make. Then I read Jim Moore’s “A Conspiracy of One” and Gerald Posner’s “Case Closed” and that turned me from a hard core conspiracy theorist to leaning heavily towards the “lone gunman” side.
I also toyed with the idea of using this footage in my Vidor documentary “The Least of My Brothers,” comparing the Kennedy Assassination to the Bill Simpson Murder. But that idea was dropped and I never went very far with it.
In this video you can see the Grassy Knoll, you can see Conspiracy author Robert Groden peddling his books and videos, and I got to take ride in a replica of Kennedys Presidential limousine.
First Shots: The Texas Schoolbook Depository as seen from about half a block away. I think its the corner of Main and Houston, where assassination witness Arnold Rowland was standing.
Close Ups of the sixth floor snipers nest window.
1.05 George Dealey Statue
1.25 Shot of the The Texas Schoolbook Depository from the closest corner.
3.33 I was standing on the grassy knoll, behind the picket fence, where some witnesses though the shots came from.
4.24 Robert Groden banner.
5.50 Robert Groden sits and peddles his books and videos.
7:03 Where James Tague was standing.
7.31 Video shot from the railroad bridge.
10:01 Railroad tower.
11.01 Replica Limousine tour, from within the limo.
12.25 standing POV from within the limousine.
12.32 Police Ramp entrance
15.46 Limo entering Dealey Plaza
17:15 back seat
17:17 Conspiracy Museum
18.30 replica limo enters Dealey Plaza
20.00 Limo shot from railroad bridge.
I am not sure but I think this might be the company that owns that replica of the JFK limo today:
http://www.dallastexastourattractions.com/presidential-limo-tour/#limo-model
The Sixth Floor Museum : http://www.jfk.org
Jim Moore’s A Conspiracy of One on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-One-Jim-Moore/dp/0962621951
Gerald Posner’s Case Closed: www.posner.com/case-closed
If you want to visit Dealey Plaza yourself someday, talk to… :
www.facebook.com/DfwHistoricalTours for a tour.