Tag Archives: #kennedy_assassination

Jerry Dealey on the Dealey Plaza and the Schoolbook Depository

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/09/19/jerry-dealey-on-the-dealey-plaza-and-the-schoolbook-depository/

In episode 45 of “On the Trail of Delusion” an indirect descendant of George Bannerman Dealey, for whom Dealey Plaza is named, discusses his life and his book “JFK Assassination: Shades From The Fence.”

The host & Jerry Dealey examine the numerous widespread JFK conspiracies that might be true, and the reasons they might be false.

This is part one, and part two is way down at the bottom of this page.

TRANSCRIPT of part one ( Part two is further down the page)

Welcome to another edition of On the Trail of Delusion,
where I try to separate the wheat from the chaff and give you something substantial on the JFK assassination rather than some of the usual nonsense you see on YouTube and all over the internet.
So today my special guest is Jerry Dealey important book that people should get. It’s right here.
I strongly recommend this book. it’s it’s terrific.
And he’s also written an excellent book about the origins of Dealy Plaza
And he also is the best tour guide uh in Dallas uh bar none. So Jerry, welcome to On the Trail of Delusion.
Thank you. Thank you. Glad to be here.
So, um, let’s start off. I mean, perhaps you can give us a bit of, you know, the background of your family and yourself and, uh, and the plaza.
Okay. Well, I like to tell researchers and I also mention in my book. Dealey was a name I was told by my first handlers to use all the time. And of course, my first handlers, I didn’t know their real name. I called them mom and dad.
But that was probably just an acronym, you know, kind of meaning something else.
But I am born into the Dealey family. I am a descendant of indirect descendant of GB De Plaza is named after. He was my great grandfather or grand uncle, excuse me.
So his little brother Charlie who was a poor pastor pretty much is my greatgrandfather.
And I think as a poor pastor, he took an oath of poverty and it stuck to my side of the family ever since. So if you’re going to kidnap my kids or grandkids, just remember they’re high maintenance and you’re on your own once you take them, right? But um so I got involved with the assassination because of my name. I mean um I in in the fall of I was born in Dallas. I lived in Dallas all first eight years of my life. And once I turned eight in ‘ 63, um in the fall of 63 or actually in July, I moved to Denver and my mother registered me in school under my step name, my stepfather’s name, right? She just did all the kids, my me, my brother, and all the stepids that way. So, I was in Denver at the time of the assassination in third grade, even though my father always lived here. And so, I was under the Sume name, but that’s my alibi, and I’m going to stick with it. Okay. One more big question. What is what is the proper pronunciation of of the plaza of of your name? D Plaza. So it’sorton. So it’s not it’s delay, not daily, right? It’s D. It’s definitely D. Two two E’s two le e on both sides when you pronounce it. Okay. Well, that’s good to know because I think a lot of people mispronounce it. I probably mispronounced it many times in my life. So it’s good to uh to get that cleared up. Okay. So, um, you want to talk about, uh, conspiracy or possibilities of a conspiracy in the in the JFK assassination? Yeah. I mean, I’ve been involved with this again because of my name almost from the beginning early on, you know, in the 60s and 70s. I got a hold of every book I could possibly get. Of course, it was before the internet, so everything was on books in those days. And they were harder to come by up in Denver, but I came back every summer, and I would always go down to De Plaza when I could. you know, eight years old, I wasn’t driving myself very often. So, I always went down to De Plaza. I was familiar with it. And George Bannerman Dele, the plaza is named after him. He was the publisher and the owner of the Dallas Morning News until he died in 1946. And so, the plaza is named after him because he was a very proponent in creating um city planning. He hired the city planner that pretty much planned the whole thing. and my other book be in the heart of Texas. You can get the whole history of the dele’s the Dallas families and a little bit of dou about Dallas and of course the Texas school book depository and all the buildings there. I got involved with computers in back in 1979. I had a TRS80 model one play chess on it. Yeah, trash 80. And I used to play chess on it and then I had it was cassette based and I had learned basic. So in 1980, my wife had a fairly decent job. So I went back to college and got a college degree in computer programming and I’ve been involved with computers all ever since. So it’s like 50 some odd or 40 some odd years in computers alone. I got involved with the JFK assassination when I moved back to Dallas permanently in ‘ 84. Um, again it was just kind of keeping track on it and then as the internet grew I mean first I think in ‘ 86 I had my first bulletin board system and I had a JFK room in that. It was running off floppy on a model 3 TRS80 trash 80 and I had JFKs known for that. But we did dialup modems we would go to news groups. We would go to Starex, any place that you could possibly find information on Hill news groups, alt JFK assassination dot, whatever, and you get as much information you could, not really reliable information, but then eventually AOL came on, still dial up, and then eventually the internet came up where you got routers instead of modems. And I think I did my first tour in ’93. There was NAS conference here in Bele Plaza and I used to go down the plaza on the anniversary. I remember in the 64 museum there was a big sign that showed the huge crowd for the 30th anniversary in 1993 and I used to play where’s Waldo on that because you can find me if you know where to look. So I was involved with that and then at somewhere between that and 96 when the JFK conference started I found dealer plaza UK and Ian Griggs. So, up to that point, I used to do tours and stuff for friends and families and co-workers. But then in 96, I started doing tours for Daily Plaza UK people. um over in for the your listeners or readers that aren’t not familiar that used to be a group about the JFK assassination that met over in London area and it would come over they would come over cage on the conference and so I would do tours for them whenever they came over and then eventually Ken Holmes who I also met in 96 he was a paid tour guide so I started doing paid tours in the late 90s and I’ve been doing tours I’ve given thousands of tours to thousands of people. Your tours are amazing. Absolutely, absolutely terrific tours. I mean, really, really good. So, one of the things, and we may cover it in a future session, but one of the things I always cover in the tours is the nature of conspiracies and the nature of lone nuts. We may in a future session cover the Texas School Book Depository. We plan on doing that. And that’s why I specialize more than anything else. I wrote my first book in the early 2000s and it was basically a history of Dallas um and De Plaza, the Delely family and um Texas School Book Depository. And so I could bore you forever with all that, but I’m not going to get into that right now. Yeah, we’re going to I want to start by kind of talking about just conspiracy. The biggest objection I have is people are not have a tendency not to think for themselves. Instead, they read something, they start believing that, and then they become a member of that tribe. Um, we’ll talk about the lone nut tribe. Let’s do that first. Um, lone nut is kind of misused a lot. A lot of people seem to think the nut part applies to whoever believes that Oswald acted alone. And that’s not where it originally came from. It originally came from Oswald himself being a nut. And the advantage of a nut is you don’t have to come up with a motive. You can just say, “Well, he’s crazy.” And that’s it. So, you don’t have to worry about a motive or anything like that. And so, that’s where the lone nut came from. A lot of people prefer lone gunman because that seems like you just believe Oswald acted completely alone. But that can and cannot mean a conspiracy. We’ll get into that a little bit a little bit down the road. For instance, if you’re just looking at the hard evidence, it only points to Oswald. Well, the same is true with John Wils Booth. If you’re looking at the hard evidence, the gun, the involvement, the theater, the rest of it, it only points to John Wils Booth. But he was the lone gunman in the Lincoln part of the killing. But he had co-conspirators including you know Spangler who attacked I think Spangler I’m missing the name right now. One of them who attacked the secretary of state Seward and one of them that supposed to have attacked the vice president at the same time and he chickened out and just spend his time in a bar drinking and getting drunk. But even though Booth was the only killer of Lincoln Y there was other people in the conspiracy and some of them were hanged for it. Yeah, that’s true. Including the first female hanging in the United States. Of course, it was a military tribunal and not civil law at that point because we were still at war. So just because Oswald acted alone, that does not necessarily rule out conspiracy from some point of view. A lot of people unfortunately are tribal. Human beings like to belong to a tribe and so they like to join one tribe or the other. So if they’re a conspiracy, then they point at everyone who’s a lone nut and make fun of them and ridicule them. as you kind of said in your introduction, and we’ll get into that a little bit. And if they’re a lone nut believer, then they have a tendency to push at the conspiracy and push at the extreme weird stuff of the extreme end of conspiracy. And I believe there are a lot of different conspiracy levels between the black which is they set Oswald up as a pacy. wasn’t involved and LBJ or one of his buddies or whatever killed and shot the government shot killed Kennedy and used Oswald’s psy and pure white which is what the Warren Commission came up with which basically said Oswald acted completely alone planned it without influence or intervention or even letting anyone else know what he was doing and those are the two extremes. there are many levels of conspiracy in between those two. So that’s kind of what I want to talk a little bit on today.

So we kind of I want to make it kind of an exchange, Fred. Um let’s talk about first what kind of groups disliked Kennedy and could have a conspiracy. Okay, so let’s just kind of chat on that a little bit. I’ve got a list here in front of me that we’re going to kind of cover.

I want to make sure to cover all these groups because these are the people that hated Kennedy enough to have a possible conspiracy. And so we just want to talk about all the groups that hated Kennedy. First of all, the CIA or CIA operatives. That’s not the whole agency that well the whole agency disliked Kennedy because he was kind of threatening to dismantle them. But the CIA operatives or people just didn’t like Kennedy and they hated Castro and they just wanted and might hate Kennedy for being too soft on it. And so that’s one group that’s in there. Okay. Another group that hated Kennedy was in Vietnam. Madam DM Kennedy was kind of allowed the CIA to kill both her brothers. We were getting involved in Vietnam and there had been assassination backed by the CIA. And so Madame DM kind of disliked Kennedy to a large degree. Okay. Another group we want to talk about is the mafia. U mafia hated Robert Kennedy with a passion and they would do almost anything get Robert Kennedy off off of their back. Um they also did not like Kennedy’s um support of or not doing anything about Castro kicking them out of the country. that was a cash cow for them from you know casinos and other things going on down there. So they hated the Kennedy brothers for that and some of the major mafia people like Carlos Marcelo who basically said take this stone from my shoe or you you don’t kill talking about Bobby you don’t cut off the tail of the dog you kill the head so the tail dies with it and that was talking about Bobby Candy versus JFK. Yeah. And then Trafocanti said he’s going to be hit. Um Gian Kana, of course, Gian Connor was sharing a mistress with Kennedy, Judith Exner. And he also kind of said, um he Gian Conor’s death itself, he was killed by being shot ritually around the mouth as in do not talk right before he was supposed to talk. The house select me on assassinations. John Rosselli, another mafia figure, which who was supposedly chopped up and put in a barrel floating in the Bay of Biscane, I think it was, off of Cuba. And they found his body chopped up right before he was going to go into the House of Select Committee and assassinations. So, the mafia had a very strong hatred of the Kennedys and might be a party to a conspiracy. Um, further on down, some people believe Matt LBJ disliked the Kennedys and not to have him killed. I have my doubts about that, but there are some people that think that LBJ wanted to get rid of the Kennedy so he become president. Of course, that’s what happened. Behind LBJ is the completely the industrial military complex. The movie JFK, they wanted to talk about um Vietnam again, getting involved in Vietnam. and they kind of hint to it and they say, “Well, they have LBJ saying, well, you know, if you get me in the office of the president, you can have your war.” Of course, there’s a lot of things in JFK that was really dramatized and it’s not really accurate at all. It should never be confused as documentary. I don’t complain too much about it, but it was good for stimulating interest in the ’90s when it first came out. Although Stanley uh Stanley Caro actually uh talks about that quote um and published an article about that quote in which he said the quote is accurate, but he said uh Lyndon Johnson was telling all sorts of different things to different people at the time. Right. And getting get me into office is not the same as kill my predecessor. Yeah. So again, it can be meaningful. I don’t particularly think LBJ did it did it, but it’s possible. I can see some people believing that. Um, kind of going down through here, the communists, of course, Kennedy had completely the Russian communist, uh, Kennedy had completely embarrassed them during the Cuban missile crisis and made them back off. And then there was a whole thing with the nuclear and the cold war. Um, Castro and Cuba, Castro because of the Bay of Pigs and the missile crisis and Operation Mongoose where they were supposedly the Kennedy brothers and the CIA were trying to eliminate him by using mafia figures. These are, you know, all groups that kind of um dislike the Kennedys. The ant most common ones the anti-Castro Cubans that Oswald was involved with were the people who thought they were betrayed at the Bay of Pigs when Kennedy did not give them flight support and they wanted to get him out of office and this includes such people supposedly according to the movie JFK as David Ferry and Guy Banister and that whole group over New Orleans. Um, another we already talked about the military industrial complex. Oh yeah, some people believe that Kennedy was killed by radical religious people such as Southern Baptist because he was Catholic. I don’t put a lot of meaning in that, but this has been brought up. I know I have a stepbrother who insists that’s who who’s behind it. So whether that’s of course you have Israel. Yeah. Yeah. Israel and his you know all that in there. The hat people and that’s kind of a joke. Um, we we kind of teased that if Kennedy had pretty much if he put the hat on that morning, it was a test, they wouldn’t have killed him. But since he refused to put the hat on, right, and which might have killed the hat business, then maybe they conspired to have him killed, right? Any groups I missed that you didn’t that you didn’t hear in that list? Not offing on kind of wanted to turn it into a chat. Yeah, not off hand. I mean, there’s there’s there’s there’s lots of groups. I mean, I I don’t know if you want me to talk about any one of them or or or I don’t know how you want me to, you know, because there there I have comments on all of these sort of potential these groups. I mean you could for in particular like the CIA you can um Allan Dulles would be a particular uh candidate that a lot of people talk about as one person who or or James Ankleton would be two top people but Bill Harvey would be the other those are three CIA people that that are talked about a lot as being behind a plot. So the other question then comes up did O which of these groups did Oswald have ties to? Yes, very strongly he had ties to the anti-castro group. This back in Miami or excuse me, New Orleans where he tried to infiltrate that group and he had to debate against them on stage and so on so forth. But now he was doing a pro Castro Fair Play for Cuba committee chapter. He was about the only member and that’s a pro Castro group. So there’s some debate whether it was anti or pro. Um he also had ties allegedly to the CIA. This is the old uh John Etly Phillips and the Maurice Bishop story where some people um Martino I think is the his name uh John Martino were said that Oswald met with Maurice Bishop in the restaurant of the [snorts] hotel in Dallas and there was a meeting between the two not long before the assassination. So lots of groups there. Um and Oswaldo has had ties to Russia because he did try to um defect to Russia and then came back and he had ties to what’s the other group rightwing. That’s pretty much it. Most of the ties that he had to I don’t think he had ties to FBI and Hoover which I didn’t mention at all. I mean FBI did try to downplay their knowledge of Oswald. So any of these groups could have had multiple conspiracies open. So the question always came up I think when I joined uh the group Fair Play for Cuba for Fair Play for GFK excuse me on Facebook group which I moderate to this day. Uh when I joined that, the member had a poll where he said, “Did there exist conspiracies before November 22nd, 1963, or do you believe as Oswald acted alone?” And the third option he put was unknown. Well, I kind of bucked at that a little bit. Um I basically said, “Well, existence of conspiracy is not the same as was Oswalt involved with conspiracy or did a conspiracy kill it?” The question should have actually said been asked. Do you think Oswald asked alone or do you think he Kennedy was killed as a result of a conspiracy whether involving Oswald or not. So I’m kind of a fence sitter and you know this whole thing is kind of a fenceitter 101 type of discussion. I’m a completely conspira fence sitter on that and we’re all conspiracy theorists. Now, your book said conspiracy freak. What did you mean by conspiracy freak? What was it you believed at that time? Yeah. Well, and and people misinterpret that. I mean, first off, I’m very I was very very influenced by the comic strip Dunesbury. I don’t know if you know Dunesbury and Zoncker. Zoncker was one of the characters in Dunesbury and he always referred to himself as a freak, right? And a freak meant somebody who sort of was interested in something that was different. You know, he was sort of different. He had different interests and and he was a lovable freak, right? Um and that’s what I meant by this as a freak. I was a conspiracy freak. I was a not crazy. I was a nice guy, but I was I was sort of obsessed um like a nerd. I was obsessed with the JFK assassination. And it became a very very important part of my life. And so I was sort of a a conspiracy freak and I like to talk about about it to people. It wasn’t sort of anything nasty or negative in in my view. Yeah. I mean, usually back in those days, we usually called them conspiracy buffs. Yeah. Not conspiracy theorists. And of course, it was a take off of a movie title, you know, and so uh monster movie title, you know, and so it was a nice I thought it it made a nice juosition to use that term. Yeah. I mean it it’s always a lot of times it’s said by some conspiracy buffs that some of the people believe in lung nut find a certain comfort in that a certain comfort in believing that Oswald acted alone and the government got it right and the Warren Commission got it right and that’s it it’s over it’s done but there’s also certain cons comfort and I’m not saying everyone does this in being a conspiracy theorist because you reach a point in your life where you realize you’re not going to come up with the uh cure cure for cancer. You’re not going to become president, king of the world, president of the United States, you’re not going to be famous, you’re not going to be powerful, so on and so forth. And there’s some people, and it’s not everybody. I don’t criticize labels because none of the labels really point to group thinking, but there are some individuals that get more comfort in a conspiracy where big brothers holding them down or there’s some high cabal, you know, trying to run the world or um what what’s the latest term? secret government, whatever it’s called, the, you know, black ops, not black ops, but secret government, shadow government, trying to hold them down that keeps them from growing. And so, a lot of people conspiracy, but if you think about it, we’re all conspiracy theorists because we look at the theories and we evaluate. And so, we’re all conspiracy theorists in that we analyze and evaluate. Unfortunately, many of the people don’t do that. They just pretty much read the book and then whatever the latest book is, they go with it and then they go online and they start criticizing anyone who believes something else or something completely different. And I’ve been moderating for so long, I’ve been familiar with all the crazies. I mean, I can name every one of them on both sides. And we have crazies on both sides. So the conspiracy theorists were actually all conspiracy theorists in some role or another. Um so there’s a shade of different conspiracies in between those and that’s the reason for the title of the book shades from the fence is from a fence sitter’s viewpoint and talk about all the different shades conspiracy one of the concern a light gray if you want to call it that way is Oswald was the only gunman and he was influenced or would have an escape plan given him by others maybe the anti-Castro Cubans approached him or maybe his visit to Mexico City, Kostikov, in the Russian embassy said, “Well, if you do anything, let us know and we’ll spirit you away to Cuba.” And a lot of people like John Martino in the book, uh, someone would have talked or somebody would have talked basically said Oswald was supposed to kill the president and then he was supposed to meet and they would get him on a plane, David Ferry probably flying it, and take him to Cuba, but he would not be get all the way to Cuba. they would kill him in such a way to make Cuba the blame for it. So there’s a lot of setups of conspiracy that says Oswald was just being manipulated by people or influenced by people. Another shade of gray may be Oswald was the lone shooter in the building, but there were other shooters in other locations he didn’t know about. in which case they may have said, “Well, if you manage to get out, meet us at the library or at the Texas theater or meet us somewhere and we will get you out, but we don’t want to show up in Daily Plaza because it’s going to be crowded and we don’t want other people, you know, someone to grab one of us.” But there were other shooters he didn’t know about in other buildings or on the grassy null. And maybe he was just not told because if he knew there was other shooters, he may start jumping up and down saying, “They’re going to blame this on me as a pathy.” And he could have been just told, “Find your way back.” And that was the way he got it. And it goes on and on and on. Oswald helping others access the building. And if we could do a a podcast session on the interior of the building, I find that highly doubtful because it’s hard to get your people in and out of the building without them being seen by any of the employees. So I don’t think there’s another shoe in the building, but maybe Oswald helped it. I mean, the book The Men on the Sixth Floor talk about that. They talk about Mac Wallace and Loy Factor, I think, on the sixth floor and Oswald and the three of them were shooting. But the problem is with that, you still have to get people in and out of the building. or there could be complete conspiracies where Oswald was in the second floor lunchroom the entire time and again that’s highly questionable but when we get into this story so there’s a lot of different areas of conspiracy that you can talk about without going to the extremes unfortunately more often out than not out there is we’re making fun at the other extreme and that’s a whole tribalism thing which don’t get me started on that which I get to a lot about don’t be tribal about it. You know, I just because you’re a different tribe doesn’t mean you disagree or hate everybody on the other side. I try to treat people as individuals. And I and I I appreciate that. I mean, my the way I always put it is I I think that they’re sort of two sandboxes. And the conspiracy sandbox is a bigger sandbox and it’s a lot more fun because you could say whatever you want. You could throw things. Um whereas the non-conspiracy sandbox is a lot smaller. It’s not as much fun. um you typically can’t throw things. Um that’s the way I look at it. Well, I mean I that analogy is fine, but I would think it’s a long sandbox with a deep sand on one end, a shallow sand on the other, and it’s just one sand because there’s a lot of other people playing with a lot of sand in between you and the guy in the deepest sand. It’s actually harder for conspiracy theorists to prove their point because there’s so many different choices that they cannot really prove any one thing. is easier for the lone nut side or the lone gunman side to prove their point because they have the evidence the hard well and that’s and and one of the things I would ask you I mean is there an alternative theory to Oswald as a lone gunman and I asked that in the sense of it’s the only theory that explains all the evidence not all there are there are there is evidence of other shooters for instance There are about six or seven different places in the um in the street and on the sidewalk and in the grass where the House Select Committee Assassination received reports of impacts, bullet impacts. And if any more than two of them happened, one missed shot could possibly hit the street once and then hit the curb and then bounce up and hit TEG. But if any of those other impacts happened in street in different places throughout the street, then there had to be another shooter because Oswald didn’t have enough time to off that many shots. Yeah. And I get that. But the issue here is for me is if you if your theory I mean whatever the Oswald is a lone gun is the only coherent theory that explains the the fragments and the bullets and and a whole variety of other evidence tippet everything else. It explains that. Whereas once you get into a any one of those CIA Allen Dulles um all of a sudden you start veering away from you can’t explain everything and that’s the the the issue I have here is is that there is no actual competing theory which does which explains as much I would say as the lone gunman theory. There’s no competing theory when you’re saying that there were the shooters were conspirators, not Oswald. I agree with that. But if Oswald was one of many shooters, whether he knew about them or not, then the hard evidence in the building would still point to Oswald. Of course, there would still be could still be other shooters other locations. They didn’t have to have shell casings because they didn’t have to eject their one single shot. And so there could be, but the hard evidence does point to Oswald being a probably the lone only gunman in the Texas School Book Depository. And that’s the reason I say that’s a much easier point to prove. Yep. Because of hard evidence. I do believe Oswald would have been convicted in the 1964 Dallas trial had there been one. Of course, we’ll never know what Oswald would have said in his own defense. I doubt if he would ever stood up and jump up and down point to someone else because and that’s a question comes up a lot on my tours. Well, if it was Oswald, then why did he come running out of the building and saying it’s it wasn’t me. If it wasn’t Oswald, why would he allow himself to get set up? Well, he might allow himself to set up because he may have been told, “We’re going to take you to Cuba and you’re going to be a hero.” And he let someone else in the building. Again, I find that doubtful. But if I’m Oswald, I would not and I’m not do a shooter, I would make sure I would be standing out front with the vice president of the of the building where I could be seen and I would make sure I have an alibi. I even if I’m setting myself up, I would try to do that anyway. If I’m not actively up there shooting, I would want to be somewhere where I could prove I was there. The other question comes up is if he knew about other people like he’s involved in the conspiracy, why not tell there’s other people? The minute you admit there’s other people involved in the assassination, that incrim incriminates you as well. You can’t just say, “I knew about it and they did the actual shooting because it doesn’t really matter if you’re involved even as a getaway driver in a bank robbery and the bank someone is killed in the bank, you’re still guilty of murder in the state of Texas.” Yeah. because you did a felony that involved you and you knew about it and if someone was killed, you’re involved for murder. So again, it’s not a question of is Oswald why wouldn’t Oswald help set himself up or would he try to try to do an alibi? So, I do believe he was the only shooter in the building, but whether or not he told someone, whether or not he had escape plans with someone, again, my tour, we go Oswell’s escape route, and is very hard looking at that escape route to show that he planned it. It’s like, and Oswwell’s a smart individual. I mean, by the age of 24, most of us have not gotten ourselves in and out of the Marines, been a radar operator, taught ourselves Russian, got ourselves into the Soviet Union, married a wife. Of course, some of us have married by that age, had a baby, you know, got ourselves back with a loan from the State Department. You know, it’s he’s done a lot of things for his 24 year old. Been in debates about communism, socialism, again, learning Russian while in the Marines. I mean, that can’t be easy. It’s not like the Mar Well, the Marines did have a course on teaching Russian. Military intelligence did have a course out to El Toro, California. And Oswald was supposedly stationed there for a while. But whether or not he was stationed there long enough to learn Russian, I don’t know. But it’s not like it’s an easy thing to do in the military. is teach yourself Russian. So, a lot of different things in there that makes it kind of questionable. And as you know, in my book, I I list over 150 seeds of doubt is what I call Yeah. And I, you know, I do have some issues with some of the seeds of doubt. For instance, uh well, pre-nowledge pre-nowledge of the assassination. I mean, you list you list some people in there that I’ve done a lot of research on like Richard Case Niguel um who uh was a complete fraud who I don’t believe had any pre-nowledge of anything or Rose Sheream um or Joseph Miltier. I don’t think there’s anybody who who you could say that really had pre-nowledge that is credible. And at same list, Rose Sheremy that was also the detective, Lieutenant Fruge, that supposedly interviewed her in the hospital and the doctors involved in it. And uh John Martino, this another person in Larry Hancock’s book, Somebody would have talked. John Martino supposedly kept his kid home from school that day and said, “Watch the news while I paint the kitchen. Let me know if anything goes on.” And once the assassination happened, he stopped painting the kitchen. He started making phone calls to all sorts of people. He claims he was a moneyman for the anti-Castro Cubans. And so that was another person that supposedly had pre-nowledge. Again, it’s the the problem with seeds of doubt is, and I say it in my book, any of them can be explained. They’re not all credible witnesses. Yep. They’re not all credible people. And a lot of people after the fact came out and said they were involved that may not do it. At least Rose Sheremy it was beforehand and Jose the problem with Rose Sher is is that is that there was no contemporaneous report of her saying anything at the at the time uh after right after the assassination. There just there just isn’t um Fuj Fuj Fuja only came forward uh with that claim in 1978. In 1967, he wrote a report for Jim Garrison where he said the only statement she made was that Ruby and Oswald were bed partners. And in his statement, he said, “Any other statements by Sheream is hearsay.” Hearsay, did she actually say it while in the hospital beforehand though? Nobody, but there’s not one witness who claims that she did except for Fuja in 78. Okay. Okay. And the other thing about Fujer is that um uh what a lot of people don’t realize is that Fujer uh for you know he had a he was investigating Sheremy and Clinton with with Anne Dishler. They were they were Garrison’s investigators and they had an affair together and he then embezzled money uh from uh Anne Dishler. Um and he confided in her that he had um manufactured evidence in a murder case. Okay. Okay. Um just real quick since I don’t know how many people watched all your sessions, let’s just talk about Nagel or Yeah. How’ you pronounce his name? Uh well, it’s hard. Sometimes some people say Niguel, some people say Nagel and I nobody uh Dick Russell says uh both were used. So I don’t I’m not sure what the real pronunciation is. So for the other people watching this and not unfamiliar with that, let me recap that very briefly and you come and correct me whenever you need to. Uh basically um the man who knew too much was the name of the book by Dick Russell. And according to him, Nagel walked into a bank in El Paso, I believe in September of 63. That’s right. And he pretty much handed the cashier a note that said, “Give me your money.” And then cashier kind of took the note, stepped away a little bit. He fired two shots in the ceiling of the bank and then walked out and stayed by his car until the cops showed up and they arrested him. And according to Dick Russell, they basic he basically said he knew there was going to be an assassination attempt and he did not want to be set up as the psy intentionally got himself arrested. So fill that gap whatever you need to. Uh yeah. Well, actually he got into his car after the bank robbery and we stopped while he was in his car driving away. But um again there’s no evidence that he he before you know that he had any knowledge before the assassination and and it’s only after the assassination that some of these reports start to happen. The problem with Nagel is that in 1954 he was in in an airplane crash um while he was return going into uh Washington from Los Angeles and he was the sole survivor of this airplane crash. He laid in the wreckage for 12 hours and he had a a serious concussion. Um he was in the hospital for for several months and he suffered uh organic brain damage. Um and that was on top of two concussions that he got during the Korean War. So when he returned to service, he went into military intelligence. um he started to become very very erratic and very paranoid and he started accusing all of his superiors of all sorts of issues and eventually he had to leave leave the military and he went into civilian life in Los Angeles and he had trouble holding down a job um and and that’s part of the story. He had brain damage and there’s just no evidence of of any of his claims uh holding any water. I mean, in fact, I think he made his claims uh largely to get people to to help him. He started with the garrison people, telling the garrison people about some of his claims because the garrison assistant DAS actually wrote his writ for habius corpus. he got them to write like a 90page writ um and then he got uh he got Bernard Fester later to help him with his law case uh against the US government in which he claimed he was he claiming that he was uh he had organic brain damage um and he wanted to get a full disability pension and so once these people stopped working for him he uh he then stopped talking to people. I think he just wanted help. Yeah. and and he was a very like like you said a very unstable unreliable witness because of the brain damage and he later was committed at one point or the government tried to get him committed. Correct. Well, he No, he was he was in while he was in prison he had many psychiatric examinations and he was in he was at Springfield which was the medical center for federal prisoners uh where he was under you know psychiatric evaluation. But once he got released, he had he actually had a series of himself checking into VA hospitals claiming of headaches, memory problems, um all sorts of of mental issues over and over and over again uh many many times. He he actually uh and I think it was a plea for help. Okay, good. Um since we brought up Rose Sheremy, let me recap that a little bit for sure. Yeah. People viewing for the viewers. Rose Shermy was basically a some accused prostitute, some accused her of drug running, but she supposedly got into a car with a bunch of men going to Dallas. They pushed her out of the car. She was badly damaged. She was freaked out out of her mind on drugs and was hospitalized in Louisiana somewhere. I don’t remember the exact parish. And uh we mentioned Lieutenant Fruge, which is kind of the guy who interviewed Rose Sheream. And allegedly she was during the time she was in the hospital, she was kind of ranting and raving about they’re going to go kill Kennedy and these guys supposedly claimed all that and then shoved her out of the car. That’s pretty much the thumbnail sketch of Rose Sherman. Yeah. And and what I find really amazing about her is that supposedly she talks about the assassination before it happened and Fujer goes to pick her up on the Monday after the assassination. He checks her out of the hospital and what does he do? He she has information about a drug deal. So he calls he was working narcotics. He calls his superiors in the Louis Louisiana State Police and they tell him, “Okay, um, contact the people in Texas. Take her to Houston to help work this drug deal.” Doesn’t contact the FBI about the assassination. He takes her to Houston to work a drug deal with federal customs agents. They start working this drug deal and the agents uh then contact the Houston they look up her record and they find out that she’s wanted in Houston and this is I have the physical the written reports and they say you know what that’s it we’re not interested in they just let her just let her go because we’re not interested. I mean I I don’t understand how Fuja if she really had said something about the assassination how he could not have gone to the FBI. Well, again, if she’s that out of it and involved with all the other stuff, even Fuja may recognize she’s very unreliable witness that it’s not worth pursuing with the FBI. I mean, he probably should have mentioned it and we we did find out about the House Select Committee on Assassinations, but you know, it wasn’t at the time that she was reliable enough that he would try to pursue it or really push it. Not one witness from the hospital came forward to the FBI or the Warren Commission. Not one. Right. Okay. And we also mentioned Joseph Miltier. So, let’s go ahead and cover that for the viewers, too. Um, trying to play catchup cleanup as we go here. Yeah. Um, Joseph Miltier was pretty much recorded. He was with an FBI informant by the name of William Somerset. They had a recording, the manipul kind of played the recording where he basically said he’s going to be shot from a high-powered building uh with a rifle or I’m sorry, high building with a rifle, high-powered rifle. And the guy is going to have to take the blame for it. And that was pretty much a recording that came out the men who killed Kennedy. So again, maybe pre-nowledge, maybe not. Where you going to fill a gap there? Well, he actually named a person who would actually do the shooting. He actually named a name and that person wasn’t anywhere in Dallas at all. It was just sort of a general general discussion about what, you know, what could, you know, how we could get Kennedy. Uh, in fact, Kennedy himself actually mentioned, “Hey, somebody could shoot me from a building.” Um, so it’s not it doesn’t really actually it’s not really real pre-nowledge of of an actual event. Okay. So, I haven’t got my seeds of doubt right here. I think there was also a little um a radio operator or something over in London that pretty much said something’s going on. and I can’t think of his name right off the top of my head right now, but it was also in the seeds of diet dow pre-nowledge. We also mentioned again the pre-nowledge of Gianana Trafocanti um Marcelo maybe Roselli even though he was not making a statement like the other three did and even Jimmy Hoffen and I didn’t mention Labor and the eventual people that hated but Kennedy’s but Jimmy Hoff and the labor thing and those are also kind of mentioned in my seeds of Dallas pre-nowledge the thing I’m getting at is they show that there may have been a conspiracy or multiple conspiracies because many of these groups I’m talking about might have had a conspiracy in place. Every president has conspiracies against him. Everyone has. That does not mean that he was killed as a result of one of those conspiracies. So if Joseph Milter thinks, you know, he’s hanging around with his right-wing or you know, white supremist buddies, I forget which group he was in, something like that, and he’s overheard someone talking. He may know of a conspiracy but it may not be the one that killed Kennedy. So there’s the existence going back to the question when I first joined this group is the existence of conspiracy is not the same as Kennedy was killed as a result or as part of conspiracy. Right. Yeah. So that’s one of the reasons I’m on the fence is I can’t really rule out the existence of conspiracies. I’m sure there were some and some of these people with pre-nowledge may have been knowing about those conspiracies but not necessarily the one if there was one that killed Kennedy. Unsuccessful conspiracies is you know so that’s the reason we’re all kind of conspiracy theorists because we’re evaluating all these different conspiracies. It does not necessarily mean we believe Oswald or we believe Kennedy was killed as a result of conspiracy. Well, I get your I get your point and I think it’s a very important one and I I sort of I agree with you. The the only issue I have is that as I go through the list of those people um you know there’s no firm evidence of any real conspiracy there. Of course there might have been like you say but there’s no firm evidence any of them were you know and I go down even the list further. I mean Abraham Balden and the plot in Chicago I mean again that I think that didn’t happen at all. Um, Dinkens, Eugene Dinkens was absolute crazy. I mean, I did several blog posts on Eugene Dinkens. Rosco, was Dinkens the radio operator I was thinking of. Could be the radio operator. Yeah, he was a radio operator and I did several blog posts on him and the ra I mean the stuff he sent to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which I put in my blog post. I mean, he was just uh he was just seeing he was just making, you know, I don’t know, just visions, you know. Yeah, maybe. Oh, it’s incredible. I mean, he was seeing mapped. I mean, you should read some of my posts and well, you see what he sent the HSCA. You’ll laugh when you actually read it. Um, well, since you brought him up, let’s talk about Abraham Balden very briefly. Sure. Yeah. Okay. Basically, there was a trip planned trip to Chicago and they Chicago police, I don’t remember exactly who it was, arrested a number of people that had weapons. Some people say similar to the Carcano. And so they cancelled the trip to Chicago. And Abraham Baldwin was a Secret Service agent that reported all this. And so he later kind of got in a lot of trouble as a Secret Service agent reporting all this. But they canled that Chicago trip. Yeah. So they did cancel that Chicago trip. That was for November 2nd. They canceled it because of the DM assassination, which was huge news. Um there were there’s no evidence of of anybody being uh being uh arrested with rifles except for uh for uh Valet who was arrested and and uh and they found he did have a rifle. Uh but there’s no evidence that he made a threat against Kennedy and he was not involved in a plot. um that there it’s just that there’s only the only uh source for a plot in Chicago is Abraham Balden and he was the one who told um um he was the source for the story in the Chicago independent newspaper that Edwin Black wrote in in years later. Um he was the sole source for that story about a plot. Um there’s just no evidence to sustain it. And what I find interesting about Balden is that in May 1964 after he was charged with bribery, he he he had a press conference in Chicago to talk about um Secret Service and their problems in guarding Kennedy. They were drinking. They were doing a whole variety of of really bad things. He didn’t mention a plot in Chicago. Okay? Not one word. He only came forward with a plot in Chicago in 1967 when he talked to Mark Lane and Richard Burns, who was an assistant district attorney with Garrison’s office. And then Balden told the two of them that two of the names that were involved in Garrison’s investigation were two of the shooters, Bradley and uh Gonzalez. Isn’t that strange? He all of a sudden he picked two names out of the out of the uh Garrison inquiry and of course it was all nonsense. Well, I mean, yeah, pre-nowledge, no one really came forward ahead of time to warn anybody. Most of it talked about it afterwards. You mentioned Maline Duncan Brown. Well, we didn’t get to Maline Brown. We You mentioned Mac Wallace. Let’s recap on Mac Wallace a little bit briefly. Um, M. Wallace was a crony of LBJ. He supposedly at one time killed a uh tennis instructor or golf instructor. I forget which it was in, you know, that had been dating Josepha Johnson, which is Lyndon Johnson’s sister. And he supposedly got [clears throat] probation for it, for murder, but he was convicted of murder and got probation for it. And LBJ, and he was a crony. and one of his one of El LBJ’s cronies and some people the men on the sixth floor is this the book I’m thinking of where they say he was a shooter up on the sixth floor and he left a thumb print up there even though there’s no providence on that thumbrint it just suddenly showed up the men who killed Kennedy and we don’t know where it came from it wasn’t necessarily on a box according to Studebaker and the rest of them so there’s no real providence on that thumbrint it was Mac Wallace pro thumb print supposedly So he was kind of mentioned there. Anything in there I’m kind of missing as well I don’t really know his story that well. All I know is Joan Melon who I who I don’t like that much but Joe Melon did some research and she said that that the fingerprint was not Mac Wallace’s thumbprint. Right. But uh there’s a lot that she’s written on that. Yeah. She did a whole book on that particular subject I think. And so it was after the fact. And while we’re talking about after the fact let’s talk about Maline Duncan Brown very briefly. Maline Duncan Brown was supposedly LBJ’s mistress, had a son with LBJ. And while LBJ was alive, he always sent some money to help her support the son. Now, once he died, Ladybird cut that off. The weekend of the assassination, she supposedly went to a party and she claimed in her book, Hoover was at that party that night. This is the night before the assassination, right? Now, it was at the Minson’s house. And later on, she said it may have been Merkinson Jr., one of the kids’ house instead. But we know for record that LBJ was not at in Dallas that day because he kept a record where he was and he did not fly to Dallas that weekend. But she mentioned all that and she supposedly confronted LBJ afterwards at a party and basically said, “Everyone seems to think you’re behind it, the assassination.” and he reportedly, and it was the only sensational part of her book, told her, “If you want to talk about who’s behind it, look at your Dallas Oilmen buddies,” which were a lot of the Dallas Oilmen, the right-wing oilmen in Dallas. And a lot of people believe that they were behind the assassination. Again, I mentioned that in my list of conspiracies that possible people dislike Kennedy and that includes Ted De, my cousin, my first cousin twice removed, whatever it was, who actually got into an argument with Kennedy in ‘ 61 in September told him he was soft on communism and he was like Caroline riding the tricycle around the White House instead of being a gallant ste on a on a white horse. So, there are a lot of people that said afterwards they did it. My point is is that does not eliminate a conspiracy. There are multiple conspiracies that could have been there, but that does not prove that Kennedy was killed as a part of a conspiracy. So, when I’m on the fence, it’s pretty much that I do believe Oswald was a shooter. I’m about 85% convinced of that. 95% that he shot Tippet. And of course, the argument always is if he, you know, if he didn’t shoot Tippet, well, why would he pull a gun of McDonald in the theater? And if he um shot Tippet, if he didn’t shoot Kennedy, why would he kill Tippet? And that gets into the whole and on tours we talk about Oswell’s escape plan and the lack of thereof. So it all kind of goes around the circle. Oswald could have been involved, but that does not eliminate conspiracies and it does not eliminate him being part of conspiracy. The one thing I I would add on Oswald and and uh is is that Oswald has a has as as as a lone gunman uh his person he he he was very much a loner. He he he didn’t have that many friends and so would you know I don’t know whether he would have had conspirators and when would would those people have contacted him because it was when did he make the decision to to kill Kennedy? That’s what I, you know, we know that in a rooming house, I mean, he he he didn’t have visitors and he would come home after work and be alone in his room. He did have a phone. He knew the phone number there. So, he could be called and then go to dinner somewhere, walk across the restaurants, you know, there was he he didn’t drive, so it wouldn’t be a way like he could go and contacted a lot of people or drive around, meet a lot of people. They would have to come by and pick him up or meet him someplace close by so he could walk to it. But, we don’t know that. You’re right. Oswald is a loner, so we don’t know that he was involved with any of these people. We do know, and the problem I have with the Warren Commission is they pretty much disregard all of his history, his defection, all of his pro and anti-Castro activities in New Orleans. They pretty much ignore all that and just kind of shrug their shoulders. The Warren Commission did not say Oswald acted alone. They said they could not find evidence of conspiracy. That’s all they That’s as far as they went. And LBJ kind of implied when he got Warren to join it by saying you could save the lives of 40 million people that he thought Castro, Cuba, Russia might be behind it. Yeah. Or or did he say that because he thought that the rumors might force the Americans into the government into doing something they they shouldn’t do? I mean, he was worried about the rumors at at some point very early on. I think because of the NSA, they really had an indication that the the Russians and Cubans weren’t involved. And and that’s kind of what research has pretty much showed the Russians were worried about. They were worried about the anti- or the right-wing or anti-Castro Cubans were setting them up. And that’s a very common uh motive is basically is they used a person that had been to Russia that involved with the pro-castro to be the shooter so they could put the blame at the door of Russia andor Cuba. If it’s the mafia, the CIA, anti-Castro Cubans, that’s all their motives. Could be their motives. I’m not saying it is their motives. I’m saying it could be. And so there’s a lot of, you know, why would you kill Kennedy in such a public way using an ex defector? And the answer comes back, well, if if it’s a conspiracy, and again, that’s a big if, then the reason to do that is so you can point the blame back to Castro and use that as excuse to finally invade Cuba and get rid of Castro, because you’ve got a pro Castro, pro-communist who went to Mexico City and tried to go back to Cuba. And again, the guy in Mexico City, Costikoff, who was the director of the Western Assassination Bureau, according to CIA, basically met with Oswald and maybe he said, “Well, if you do it, we’ll get you free to Cuba.” So, I can’t eliminate conspiracy. Again, the hard evidence does not point to conspiracy. The hard evidence points to Oswald. But the reason I stay on the fence is I cannot completely eliminate a conspiracy that Oswald was involved with or at least encouraged by. Whether or not that’s a conspiracy involving all other shooters, multiple shooters, shooters besides Oswald or setting him up as a py without him being a shooter, I can’t go that far either. But there are a lot of shades of conser conspiracy between those two extreme ends. And so it kind of amuses me when all the conspiracy people say, “Well, you guys believe Oswald acted completely alone, but what about all this other information?” And then all the people acted alone pretty much say, “Well, we’re going to ignore all that other information. You guys have these wow conspiracies where the hat people did it for an example.” And you can’t prove it. And so those of us, there are a lot more fence setters out there than most of us believe. But some people that can be true. I mean, I I do I do think that once you do have Oswald as the shooter, it really narrows the possibilities. Uh it does of of conspiracy dramatically because of the nature of who he is and and [clears throat] u yeah, I think that’s that’s just a truism. I think it doesn’t narrow the existence of conspiracies, but it does narrow whether or not Oswald was acting with a conspiracy or there was a conspiracy of shooters and Oswald was not a shooter. It does narrow those two down. I do think Oswald was involved. Now, whether or not he was part of conspiracy, again, very nature of Oswald, he’s a very private individual. He pretty much doesn’t have any friends. George Deorn Shield aside, he didn’t see him that often by that time of 63 anyway. That was his earlier trip to Dallas that he left in April of there and went to New Orleans. So, he didn’t have any friends. He didn’t have any transportation. He did not have a way to get away or go meet people um unless they picked him up. So, again, I can’t completely eliminate conspiracies, but I don’t think there was conspiracy. And there were shooters everywhere and they didn’t know Oswell was going to be shooting from the sixth floor museum or sixth floor sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. I find that hard to believe that Oswwell just happened to be there shooting at the same time that someone else was shooting other locations. I can’t buy that one at all. [laughter] But it kind of goes up and down. So that’s kind of the nature of fence sitting and well I I have to say that I you know again I I strongly recommend that people buy this book and um it is it is you know worthy it is worth worthy of being on in every JFK library um around and there’s a it it is there’s a it’s chalk full of really really important information. I look forward to our next uh discussion on the Texas School Book Depository. Yeah, because I wrote at least four chapters on the movements inside the school book depository. Nobody knows better than you and I I presented that many times at conference and I’ve given tours and National Geographic. I gave them tour when they came out with the movie Killing Kennedy. I gave all those guys a tour. Um, and so on so forth. I almost called the book dummy, you know, for dummies. JFK assassination for dummies. But the minute you do that, you insult the audience and they won’t grab it off the shelf. No one buys a four dummy or no one is seen buying a four dummy book. Uh but the the four dummies books have done very well actually. You know they’ve actually they’ve done very very well. Well, you pretty much order them by mail. You don’t [laughter] go to a store with your friends and say, “Oh, by the way, I want to stop and pick up this four dummy.” Given the way everybody buys through Amazon these days and nobody goes to a bookstore. Um you know, which is unfortunate because I I I really miss my bookstores. Um very sad. Anyways, it’s another topic. Well, look, thank you very much for um appearing and uh I can’t wait for one more thing real quick for your listeners. And the reason I almost called it for dummies is it’s a good intro book if you’re undecided.

Now, if your mind is made up 100% a conspiracy or 100% Oswald, don’t bother buying the book. Well, I disagree with you. I think that if no matter what’s if you’re 100% Oswald or or the other way, there’s really important stuff in here.

Thank you for saying that.

I mean, I I I I you know, uh this is the you know, the as far as the movements in the building, I probably cover that in more detail than anybody. anybody absolutely anybody else and and very important stuff and they’re in also the the police and what happened what they did what people did and uh testimony and and it’s a very important source book um for what happened after the right after the assassination. It’s it’s it’s

it’s terrific.

Okay. Thank you.

Well, thank you uh for appearing. I look forward to our next uh episode because uh people should know exactly uh what happened and what didn’t happen um after the assassination. So, thank you very much. Thanks for having me. Look forward to it. Okay, [music] great.

And here is the “sequel” where they discuss the interior layout of the Texas Schoolbook Depository.

Transcript of Part 2, ( Episode 46):

Welcome to another edition of “On the Trail of Delusion,”

 where I try to separate the wheat from the chaff and give you something substantial on the JFK assassination 

rather than some of the usual nonsense you find on the internet and on YouTube.  

And please, please subscribe to this channel if you find this content interesting. 

Well, today we’re back for part two of our discussion with Jerry Dealey, who is an expert on Dealey Plaza and also a great tour guy, 

all around good guy, and somebody who has written a great great book  about the JFK assassination. 

So, uh, welcome Jerry for part two. 

Thank you for having me back. 

Okay, so now we’re going to talk about the Texas School Book Depository. 

And you are probably the world’s best expert on the School Book Depository, uh, bar none. 

So, uh, 

well, best expert probably in the research community. 

But Frasier is still out there and he knows the building much better than I did. He was working there. 

Yeah, he was working there. 

I don’t know whether he could actually talk about it the way you do. Well, I mean, he he’s he’s a little older than me, so yeah, he’s got a few years a decade on me, I think. 

Right. 

But yeah, when he was doing his book, he actually came to my place of work and we went through a lot of these same photos we’re going to cover today, right? 

Because he had heard that I knew had a lot of them and stuff, so I gave him a bunch of. Of course, he didn’t use any of them in his book, but we talked about it for a while. That’s good.

 Okay. So, where do you want to start? 

I’m just going to go ahead and start. I mean, I’m pretty pretty much walk through it. This one’s going to be a lot of photos, and I have to apologize for those of you are watching on your phone. 

It’s going to be very hard to see some of these photos on your phone, I’m sure. Um, but we’re going to kind go through I think about almost 45 different photos as I talk. I’m going to talk about them and stuff. Um, so that’s kind of an apology up front. I really suggest if you’re going to watch it, get a nice big computer screen and watch it there. But um and so I’m not sure all the photos are available in my either of my books. Some of them are. And of course, we’ll talk mention those as we go through. So I’m going to first start a little bit. Let me pull my glasses. I need them to read and keep me from bumping into walls. Um pretty much how I got started with this. Again, I was a moderator starting in the late 90s. And around the late 90s, there was a rumor. I got into family history, dely family, all the rest of it, the Dallas Morning News. And a rumor on the internet in the forums basically said the 64 museum was going to close Dy Plaza and block it off and start charging admission. And someone responded back and said, “Well, they did that, then the De family would take it back.” And it occurred to me no one had any clue about parks and recreation and how cities take property and the rest of it. So that’s when I wrote my first book and I did all the research of it. So pretty much DY never owned no one in the Dy family actually owned the property at Deal Plaza is on. However, GB DY, the uh president of the Dallas Morning News, did own 14 acres on the other side of the triple underpass at one time, which was river bottom land. And so he did own it. And when they opened De Plaza, they tunnneled under the existing railroads to build the triple underpass. And they uh got right away for De in exchange for tax breaks for the property he owned. It wasn’t actually dedicated until I think the 20 20th anniversary or 30th anniversary of the plaza and that’s when there was a 30th anniversary, excuse me, of the shooting, the JFK shooting is when the De family went ahead and contributed land permanently to the city. So, I’m going to kind of walk through the plaza. I’m going to focus mainly on the movements inside the Texas School Book Depository. This is a picture of the sewer on Elm Street. This is with the cover off. And used to be when I was doing tours, we could just reach down and pick the cover up because it was made out plastic. It was light, but someone fell in there a few years ago. So, they welded it back shut. Taken in the mid 90s by researcher Michael Parks, I think Greg James was helping him, that shows the inlet pipes inside that sewer. There’s basically from the top of the null, there’s a 15-inch pipe that comes in from the top of the grassy null, the north grassy null, and there’s also another pipe, and you can see both of them in this picture, about 12 in, 15 in, somewhere in that range that goes from up on Elm Street extension, and then comes down the grassy null, the grass area into that sewer. They’re joined by another pipe that goes out to the center of Main Street, another 15-inch pipe. Actually, this is the one coming down from Elm Street. I apologize, but there’s another pipe that’s about 15 in. It goes down the center of Main Street and it empties into a sewer pipe that’s about 24 in right under the center of Main Street and then Main Street it flows down towards Industrial under the triple underpass and there it joins at 33 inch and then eventually that empties out. It’s a storm drain so it empties out into the Trinity River bottom. There is no way a shooter could escape through those pipes unless he can get through a 15inch diameter pipe. So the old the men who killed Kenny, I think it was episode five or six that said there was a shooter inside that that storm drain there on Elm Street. They didn’t escape that way. Let’s put it that way. In that episode, you could actually see, but you see him talking, staying in the pipe, but then he gets up, closes the pipe, walks away, and then they cut to him coming out of a storm drain, but a couple blocks north on Continental in the Triny River Bottle, and they imply he went all the way under inside the sewer. That’s it’s not possible. He actually walked away. Um Jim Garrison believed there was a shooter up on the grassy null on the storm drain up there that feeds into this pipe. So slide two you can see that this was kind of from the Jim Garrison investigation and there’s a storm drain up on the north null and it was pretty much just a storm drain for water runoff. There was a pipe in there that goes to the far side of the parking lot up there by the railroad tracks because there’s now a sidewalk there. I’m not sure was there in ‘ 63. Again, you can see by the weeds and stuff. This was not paved back in 67 when Garrison was doing the investigation. An assassin in the sewer have a have a a shot? Could he taken a shot at at the motorcade? One of the things they came up with that shows Greg James standing on the 50 feet below the spot the X where the head shot occurred, right? And you can see him out through the front of this uh drain pipe, but you can barely see him because of the pavement because the angle of the of the drain there. So, no, he’s 50 feet down for it was you can barely see him on the left edge of this storm drain. So the opening was certainly wide enough that you could shoot from there, but unless you are turning a rifle sideways, you wouldn’t be able to shoot that far uphill to where the X is. So we’re basically going to talk just a little bit about the tech school. Um again, kind of a 100x 100x 100 square building, completely cube shaped, and it’s seven floors. Now, this used to be a fivestory building back in in the early days when it was first built, 1898. It was a five-story building, but they had a fire in 1901. And at that time, they added the sixth and seventh floor when they rebuilt it. So, if you see roof supports on the facade in front on the fifth floor, and the fifth floor is the last one that’s not got a round circular window on it, you can see roof supports. That’s as tall as the building used to be. back in the day. Um, this area of Dley Plaza basically before it became Dley Plaza and this next picture goes basically to what the plaza looked like in 1850s, 1860s. And Main Street is the street coming right in front in the foreground. That’s Houston Street. And you can see the Crutchfield House, which was up the corner of Maine and Houston. The railroad yard was specific, which is a block behind the schoolbook depository. And the schoolbook depository lot was used by Guo’s Carriage Works. And that was from about 18 1860s up through um 1898 when they rebuilt and they built the Texas School Book Depository. And of course, it wasn’t called that at the time. It was called the Rock Allen Plow Company. Um again, 1901, they have a fire. This is pretty much the fire newspaper article. and it it pretty much burned out the entire guts of the building. So they rebuilt it and they added the sixth and seventh floor at that time. So it was bought by David Herald Bird in the 196 or 30s and then he rented it to Sexton Grocery Supply. So this is pretty much the Sexton plant, the grocery supply and it stayed that way from 36 on through the years. And there was basically three entrances into the building or two main entrances to the building. There was the front entrance everyone’s familiar with right there on Elm Street extension. There was back by the dock. There was a dock door entrance. And you can see that this is the dock back here in the back. And this is the the eastern dock north side northeast corner of the building. You can see the uh row of windows there. Second from the right. That is the elevator shaft of the freight elevator. There was a row of windows in that elevator sha shaft. So, those are signs to warn people that that’s an elevator shaft. So, if there’s a fire or something, the firemen don’t try to break into that window and fall to their death down the elevator shaft. And we’ll get to the elevator in just a couple minutes. And this the back door in the building. So, this is the door that Oswald and Buier would come in in the mornings when they came in to work. They would park the north warehouse. And we’ll get to the North Texas warehouse in a couple minutes. And they would come in this back door. The office personnel pretty much parked on the grassy null. They had parking there, the ladies that worked in the office and they would usually come in the front door was open. The third door we’ll get to in just a minute, but we’re going to go on and we’re going to look at this dock door a little bit closer. And this is the dock door, the entrance door to Houston Street. This is from the FBI photographs. Now, this door did not actually go into the building. It went into this dock. There was a dock structure there on the um that side the north side of the building and it went into that dock structure. So some people ask me, well where could Oswald he was not seen coming into the building carrying a package? He could have stashed it into that dock room easily and then walked in to make sure the coast is clear and people were at work before he went and got it and then took it upstairs the sixth floor. So don’t know for sure. That’s all speculation, but it’s possible. Jack Dhy’s the only one who said they saw Oswell come in that morning. Bu Wesley Frasier was about 50 feet behind him. Frasier had stayed and warmed up his battery, tried to charge it up a little bit because he had been warning the windshield wipers that had rain that morning. And so Oswald went in alone, had the jacket tucked under his arm maybe or the rifle tuck under his arm and the package and maybe even had the package tucked under his the front of his jacket. We don’t know for sure. And that would indicate, you know, no one would be able to see from the outside. It had been raining that morning. So that’s the uh and said Doy said they only saw saw him through the corner of his eye. He wasn’t okay massive attention. Did not remember him carrying a package, but then again a brown package tucked under your jacket or tucked under your arm. No one may notice it. Depends on how much of a glimpse and door he got. It like he was standing there checking everyone coming in the door or something. Again, all the movements in the warehouse, this is long before closed circuit TV. You got to remember the video cameras that they used for television were huge monsters. They’re about five foot tall and they rolled around on huge wheels and you can see them in the um Dallas police station from that weekend and they were huge. And there were not individual portable cameras and closed circuit cameras were very much unheard of. If you might have a bank vault or something, it might have one or bank tellers or something like that. But it was still very rare because the technology just wasn’t there yet. And people forget about the other dock building a lot. There’s actually two dock buildings. This is the west side of the building. And there are two dock buildings. One extending on the north side and one extending on the west side. And this side door behind that overhang right there, right to the left of it, you can see a side door that could be used after it was open. It was very seldom it was open, but they may open it for a ventilation. And there were four overhead doors that went into the schoolbook depository proper from the outside. So, people forget about this. We will come back to this picture. Oh, by the way, the Dallas County Sheriff’s did used to park in this little lot there by the overhang. It had a gate on it, and that’s where they used to park so they could get to their cars in a hurry in case some emergency came up so they wouldn’t have to go to a parking structure or something else. And so they parked there and they had a key to the gate and there’s a fence gate on the outside of it. And then like I said the secretaries parked in the parking lot there at the grassy null there the railroad yards. We want to talk about Bule Frasier and Oswalt. They worked at the north house. So I want to get a little bit details about what these buildings were and what they were used for. This building was where the offices of the Texas School Book Company were. They had been in 1961. Well, President Jack Kasein bought the company in the 30s and he built it into business. Opened the company, started the company in the 30s and built it into a major business and it pretty much supplied school books to Texas. It also supplied some school books to some schools in uh Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, I think New Mexico as well. And he bought it in the 30s. In 1961, it moved from 1900 block of Pacific Avenue. Pacific being the road that runs behind the Texas School Book Depository back in those days. And they moved into the Dowex building and from 61 to 62 and they’re on the 62C directors being in the Dowex building. That’s their offices, but they had a second warehouse up north and that this warehouse would cover the small office orders. Um, basically it would do the smaller orders that would get in the ones and twos orders, but the Texas warehouse, which was a couple blocks north or three blocks north of the Munger and Broadway, uh, did the big bulk shipments. So, like if a school year started and a school needed, you know, two cases of books, they would be shipped out of that office or that building. And Bonnie Ray Williams, for an example, was an employee of that office normally. And he was working in the Texas School Book Repository only temporarily while they were overlaying floors. They needed extra staff. He did not normally work in this building. And then this building would be like the will call counter and the offices for all the publishers on the second and third floor and the fourth floor. And then the will call counter. If they had smaller orders of one or two books, they would call in. They would place the order here. There was a dumb waiter on the second floor. They would put the order on the dumb waiter. It goes down to the shipping department, be picked up by the several workmen that filled orders like Oswald and Frasier and Char and some of the others. And then they would go through the building gathering up the books, bring them down the shipping floor, and then ship them out. give them to Troy Eugene West, a shipper, to ship them out, or they would take them up to the will call counter. They could also have people come in and pick up, but that’s about all the strangers would use coming into the building is that will call counter. There was not often that anyone strangers would be in the building, and they would be standing out like a sore thumb if they were in the building. Where the warehouse was, this is the view from the roof of the Texas School Book Depository, and it’s pointing back to the arrow where Frasier and Oswald parked that morning. So you can see kind of the distance. Um the little railroad cards here in the bottom right that is Ross Avenue which was under construction to go from the curve from Houston around to um Ross and that was under construction 63. I know James Files claims that you know he got in a car and they disappeared that way. Well that turn was under construction 63. So a lot of people weren’t doing it. And Houston Street between uh the Dowex and the schoolbook depository was like a parking lot. A lot of people just parked there because they knew no one would be back in the it wouldn’t be much of a thoroughare thoroughare. But right by that parking space behind it on the right of the arrow, you can see that’s the Texas warehouse over there. And that’s the other building where they do the bulk shipments. Like I said, Bonnie Ray Williams um worked on that building most of the time. And so that was the two two structures that they used to use and you can see it from the schoolbook depository and vice versa. But that’s where they walked. They came across these railroad tracks, walked up Houston and came in the back of the building that morning. So the interior of the building, this is the freight elevator. This is the eastern freight elevator. Now there’s a control panel there on the eastern freight elevator. I’m going to talk about these elevators a little bit. There were two elevators in a single shaft. So basically they shared the shaft. They went halfway back and then you can see on the far left there was a mesh screen in the back and you can see the other elevator on the other side of that mesh screen. It was not like a passenger elevator. It was pretty much a freight elevator and it had solid roof. You can see perforated steel up on top. It was like a steel box. So those of you have seen too many Bruce Willis Die Hard movies want to jump around inside elevator shafts. That does not work for these elevators. I’ve had some researchers say, “Yeah, well, they just repelled down the elevator shaft.” Well, if the elevator I guess if one elevator was on the fifth floor and the other one’s on the third floor, you could probably repel down the elevator shaft halfway, then go past the one elevator and then go back the other direction and finish repelling down the other half, but it’s very doubtful. This was the Eastern elevator. This one used to have a single button on it that went up or down. said up or down on it and you had to hold the button. It was a single wood slided gate on the every floor. The elevator itself does not have a gate. You don’t see one on the elevator. That gate that you can kind of see in the very right edge was a single gate on each floor. If the gate was not down and in position, the elevator would not move. But the eastern elevator was completely manual. The control panel you see on that elevator was moved there and put there when the Texas School Book Depository was converted into the museum. And this elevator is now on the sixth floor. And this is the eastern one. This the one you can see. But that panel was actually removed from the western side. And I do have photos of the interior of the western side. It looks just like this one except where the control panel used to be is just a bunch of wires now. So when they moved it, [clears throat] they moved the panel over just to make it look better. to the public walking by. The western elevator was completely automated elevator, but it was a double gate system. There was a gate on the elevator itself, wooden gate, and I think it went back and forth, sideways, and then there was a gate on each floor. Excuse me, I got those confused. The Yeah, that’s the way it was. And the gate on each floor, which is an up and down slatted wood with gaps in between it. And we’ll see that in a minute. And it was pretty much if both gates were closed, you would be able to call the elevator from any floor just like most elevators most of us are used to dealing with. And but both gates had to be closed for it to move. And we’ll get into that when we talk about the movements in the building in a minute. So this is kind of the elevators. Again, there was a little one little light bulb up on top. It was a pretty dark elevator and not well lit, but there’s one this particular photo, you can’t see it, but there at the far left upper corner. You can kind of see where the fixture is just based on where the light sha shining from. And I forgot what the sign said, but anyway. Um, and so these were the freight elevators. Let’s go to the next slide. This is the elevator shaft from the Alier film. And this is slide number or 11, elevator see-through. And so this is basically what the elevator shaft looked like when the elevators were not there. I believe this is the sixth floor. I could be mistaken. It’s taken from the area of um I think of the stairs and it’s pretty much looking right through the elevator. And again, slided side wood on the elevator. And this is double door, but these the only two doors here because they’re the ones on the floor. The other ones with the elevator, wherever the elevator is. And this is the way you could look see through the elevator. So, anyone using the elevator, sneaking in and out of the building or whatever you want to say, again, I if you want to have a conspiracy theory where other people snuck into the building and either set Oswald up or assisted Oswald or anything else, you do have the problem of getting them in and out of the building without being seen by any of the 73 employees who might report a stranger in the building. All 73 employees were talked to by the FBI in commission document 1381, which is the interview they did with all the employees in March and April. And I bring that up a couple times. And no one reported any strangers in the building except for Danny Archie Arche Ace, I pronounce it. Um, he did report a little old man who needed a restroom that came in about 12:05 1210 on the first floor. He showed him where the restroom was, waited, saw the little man leave and leave the building. That was the only stranger reported by any of the 72 employees interviewed by the FBI.

And okay, here’s the next slide, which is 12. You can see the elevator. This is the elevator. Again, it had a row of windows in there. So anyone repelling down the elevator shaft, if that’s what you want to believe, they would have to first of all access the elevator shaft, which would involve climbing over the gate and the repel up or down and hope they’re not being spotted by anyone walking by because it’s right there where anyone can walk by. And we’ll get into the layouts of the different floors in a couple minutes. So just be aware of that. I don’t mind if you have a theory that says other people snuck in the building, but you do have a problem in getting them in and out of the building without being spotted by anyone. And that’s can be a major logistical problem. Sure, there are gaps in time where we don’t have anyone using the elevators and anyone using the stairs, but how do you know when those gaps are going to be? How do you plan for that? It’s a logistics problem that you’ve got to work around before you’re planning to sneak into the building and do something. So, be aware of that. I just kind of mentioned it. The other way to access the other floors, all the floors in the building were the stairs. And this is slide 13. And this is looking from the rifle position down the six floor stairs to go down the five. These were one flight single flight stairs. Basically, you had to go up the stairs. You would go up the stairs along the north wall, which is the wall we’re not looking down, and then turn halfway and come up the stairs along the west wall, which is the wall we are looking down. And then you would have to cross the actual floor. So, anybody on that floor, anyone by it could see you crossing. It’s not like you could get back into a a stairwell, an enclosed stairwell, and go up and down. Now, a lot of the recreations they’ve done of Oswald’s movement I’ve seen done are on stairwells. And stairwells are just, you know, you walk up, you turn 180 degrees, you walk up the other half, and then you turn 180 degrees and keep going. But this would involve walking up the stairs and then crossing whatever is on that floor, the different levels of floor. If this is the sixth floor, and I think it is because this is the position of the rifle. Oswald’s clipboard was later found right there on this to the right of the elevator wall there. It was found kind of shoved between those boxes. And that was the week after the assassin or two weeks after the assassination because the school that had the order, there was two orders on the clipboard that Oswald had not filled that day. They called and said, “Where’s our books? We haven’t seen them.” So they tracked it down and they finally found Frankie Kaiser found the clipboard kind of stashed between some books there that day that Oswalt had been working on two orders. So that’s kind of on that in there the on the stairs. Here’s a close-up look of the stairs. This is number 14. And this close-up looking down the stairs. So you can see these are very loud, noisy stairs. They did have a handrail and old pipe and then they had wooden walls on the inside and brick walls on the other side. And they’re all wood stairs. So it would be very loud anyone going up and down the stairs and we talk about the girls in the stairs in a couple minutes. We’ll um discuss that a little bit. So this is the stairs kind of looking down to it. So we’re going to start with the first floor and we’re pretty much first floor was a shipping floor. It was an open floor and it pretty much had some shipping tables in the middle of it and this is where Troy Eugene West worked. And so the front entrance is going to be on the bottom of the screen here. And then there was a little lobby. And then as part of that lobby, there was a set of stairs that went up to the second floor only. Again, for those of you looking at your cell phone, it’s going to be hard to see. So I strongly suggest you watch this episode on your computer. Even then, it’s kind of tough, but these photos are all available online, all sorts of places, so it shouldn’t be any problem if anyone wants to find them. They shouldn’t be any problem finding it. There was also a passenger elevator there. When Roy Truly reorganized the first three floors, he put a passenger elevator in the building. And this passenger elevator that most the employees of the Texas Kuba company, other than the warehouse workers, would use most of the time. The freight elevators, they were certainly allowed to use them, and sometimes they even had to go up higher floors and check inventory or the stairs they were welcome to use, but most of them used the freight elevator. It was a very or pasture elevator. It was a very small elevator. It only went up to the fourth floor. So, you know, it’s right there in that lobby as well. Then there was another set of doors and then the will call counter right there at that location. This is shipping tables. So, this is the shipping table in the back. There was actually two tables back to back. You can kind of see one table here and then behind it where the other table is on top of it is another shipping table. You’ll notice there were rolls of paper on the shipping table and then there was a tape dispenser, a wet tape dispenser on the shipping table, but there was at least two of these shipping tables and they were kind of in the middle of the floor and this were Troy Eugene West. Now, people question about the paper bag that Oswald made for the rifle to take back to his room. I’m sorry, not his room, but to the Irving house. Could he have made it on this? Well, Troy Eugene West said, you know, he never saw Oswald around here, but Troy Eugene West was the only one that was pretty much stationed here all day, and he had to take breaks and go to restroom and so on so forth on occasion. So, Oswald could run up anytime. There was a roller like you can see on the bottom there in the center, paper. He could go up anytime, rip off some paper, get some tape off the dispenser, and probably make him a package with any problem. And I think the FBI, there was a big debate about whether or not the tape had gone through the dispenser and the Warren Commission. Everyone was kind of investigating what marks it would leave on this on the tape. And that would involve Oswald pulling wet tape. But if you look closely, you can see there on the right, extra tape down by the legs under the weighing machine there, right? And you can see extra tape. So Oswald could access extra tape anywhere. Um, all the shipping tables probably had rolls of a few feet of tape or the end of a roll or maybe a new roll. There’s also going to be storage locations. I think they used the freight building in the back, the dock building to store extra rolls of paper, extra rolls of tape. So, when they ran out on this roll, and this roll is getting pretty low, they would grab that extra roll and they had those stored elsewhere so they weren’t in the way of getting to the books, which is the main reason for the building. And you can actually see in the very background there on the far left, you can actually see uh Troy Eugene West, a shipper, walking through. He’s hard to see. He isn’t African-American, so he’s a little hard to see there, but he’s kind of walking back in the back corner there. Yeah. So, those are shipping tables. I just kind of wanted to mention that. Okay. So, let’s talk about the stairs, the bottom of the stairs in the first floor. And this is this is basically the shipping. This is where the FL elevator and stairs met in the back. So when Roy Truly and Baker came into the building, this is where they were standing is right there in that opening that you see because the elevators there on the right. That’s a wall. Again, the elevators were back to back, but their side was towards the front. So that was walled off. And that’s the wall of the elevators. You can see the roller for the elevator uh retraction gate up on top. And that was the elevator. So if anyone was coming down the stairs while they were waiting for the elevator, this is where they would come down the stairs and emerge. Again, this is the north wall. They did it does have a door, but a lot of times the doors were propped open. I know Vicky Adams talked with Mark Lane. Um she talked in ‘ 66, I think there was a live interview that’s online and she talked about those heavy wood doors, but if they were propped open, the doors would not be a factor in her movements. And we’ll get to her movements in a couple minutes. Okay, so we’re going to go to the second floor now. I’m [snorts] going to kind of talk about that briefly. This is the second floor. It was pretty much office spaces. This is where most of the secretaries for the Texas School Book Company worked. This is where, you know, there was restrooms across across the left and then there was office spaces or throughout this floor. There was a conference room and then right there in the middle center, it was the lunchroom. And those circled photos is the different photo numbers that the FBI put in their report. So they go into the lunchroom. There is a uh small dumb waiter right [snorts] there kind of towards the oh let’s say two o’clock position and kind [clears throat] of before you get to the wall that goes the lunchroom. That was a dumb waiter. And that again, that’s where they would put the orders and drop it in the dumb in dumb loader and lower it down to the floor and where the order fillers would then fill it up and pick it up and take it, go fill the orders and then bring it to the shipping floor to be shipped out and then they’d send a copy back up and it would get filed and processed and etc. And so this is pretty much the second floor and the layout of this is where the secretaries worked. This is where Mrs. Robert Reid worked. This is where other secretaries worked. This is where most of the secretaries worked. The lunchroom here on the second floor is pretty much where most of the um regular employees of the tech school company had lunch. The office employees, specifically the women more often than not. The men’s floor, and if we can go back a little bit briefly to number 15, uh a couple slides back had a domino room. It’s in the upper upper right where it says Houston Street Dock, right? That room right there to the right is the Domino room. And it was basically another lunchroom and it was a very small lunchroom. It was pretty much where the warehouse workers ate their lunch. They would also store in that window their coats and jackets. They would store their lunch. Um there’s also toilet back there in the very back center right. There was couple toilets. I don’t know if there was a girl’s toilet, a men’s toilet. Could have been both. I don’t know. But there was a toilet. So when Danny RC let the gentleman in from the front to use a to public toilet, that’s the one he probably appointed him to because it was a closest to the front of the building. We wouldn’t have to go up to the second floor where the main toilets were. But this is where the guys would play dominoes during the day or during their breaks, lunch, morning. Uh Hank Norman and Junior Garmin did most of the domino playing, I understand, but there’s only a couple tables in there. So, one of the questions I got at one point several years ago, I think it was the 40th 50th anniversary, one of the two. I had a debate on there was a stage production called um Oswald Talk. Not Oswald Talk, Oswalt, the Interrogation, and it was done at Kasa Mñano over in Fort Worth. That’s their major stage play, stage production play theater. And they arranged for me and Robert Groden to have a debate. Robert Groen taking the conspiracy side and me taking the lone nut side, even though I’m fed sitter. Um, I originally wanted to do Hugh Ainsworth, but I realized soon you shouldn’t get Hugh Ainssworth and Robert in the same room together. So, I backed off of that idea. Um, so I went ahead and took the lone nut. Well, we there was question and answer after the debate, brief debate. It was basically question answer for the most part. And I did the old, you know, there’s no hard evidence. And Robert, that was actually the first day his book um Absolute Proof was available. So he was selling a lot of books afterwards in the lobby, but we had a debate and I noticed Jim Mars sitting down up front and he raised his hand for question, but the moderator didn’t notice him and I didn’t notice him until, you know, I didn’t get her attention before she ended it. So I ran into Jim Mars who who we knew each other. I know all the conspira or all the researchers for the most part, right? And we knew each other and I met him next week at the JFK conference and I said, “Well, what was it you were about to ask when you raised your hand?” And he asked what I always call the Jim Mars question and the psychic Oswald question. And the question was basically Oswald allegedly said that Junior Gar, one of a couple of the black guys were in the domino room when he was having lunch that day. And they walked through is what he said. And they said, I’m not sure his exact name. They call him Junior, I think. And the question was, well, how would they know that he did that if he wasn’t in there? So his alibi, how would he know about it? Well, the answer to that question is this was the 24th day that Oswwell worked in this building. These guys would go into that room almost every day and play dominoes. If nothing else, they’d wash up at the restrooms and go in and get their jacket or get their lunch out the window. There’s all sorts of reasons to know that these guys are going to walk through that lunchroom. That’s not much of an alibi if you think about it because there’s lots of reasons that someone knows. So, it’s wasn’t that he was psychic because and I’ve had people ask me that question that way. Well, you know, he either was there to know it or he was psychic. Well, no, he was just experienced. That was would have been his 24th day of work. He had started there five weeks before miss Veterans Day. Everyone did. And so, that would have been his 24th day of work. He was completely familiar with everyone’s pattern. And he could have heard Junior Gar even say, “Well, I’ve got my lunch in the window or I’ve got my lunch down in the domino room, so that’s I’m going to go grab it or something.” Because he was working around these guys all morning. wasn’t working with them because they were busy doing other things, but he could have um heard that way. So, there’s lots of ways for him to know that that has nothing to do with being psychic. So, in addition to the uh domino room thing that was the kind of an alibi written in Fritz’s notes. We don’t have a recording of the Fritz interrogation, but we do have his notes. And one of the things in the notes is that he said, “Junior German walked through the room.” And you know that’s because he pretty much knew. The other one that was in the notes and it’s kind of an alibi is he said he was out front with Bill Shel. Well again it’s not necessarily psychic just because he either had to be there or he’s psychic. He could have overheard Bill Shel you know they were discussing where were they going watch the motorcade that morning. He could have heard heard Bill Shelly say downstairs in front. I want to be as close as possible or something. Right. So that’s not much of an alibi either. And those are the only two alibis he actually mentioned um regarding during the Wilfrit’s notes. Of course, we don’t have a recording of exactly what was said because real Will Fritz didn’t use a tape recorder, right? And those are two alibis that normally come up, right? And what about Carolyn Arnold? Oh, yeah. Carolyn Arnold basically she had three statements. She had one statement. As a matter of fact, she’s the only Texas School Book Depository employee to do a statement on Tuesday the 26th of November. So, apparently she thought someone thought was important enough to talk to her. And in that FBI statement, she basically said that she might have she was out front and she might have looked back and caught a glimpse of Oswald by the front doors. Now, there were 12 different employees in the front door and none of them said they saw Oswald that day. Right. So that’s here or there. I mean, there’s a discussion now about prayer man and all the rest of it that basically says, you know, that’s Oswald, but none of the 12 people in that front porch saw Oswald that day and definitely not during the Well, they may have seen that day working that morning. It didn’t seem during the shooting. So, it’s not apparent that he was on the front porch. Um the her second statement in commission document 1381 in March and April of 64, she said she did not see Oswald at all that day. Now these are two sworn statements to the FBI subject to perjury. So it is illegal to lie to the FBI these statements and supposedly notorized and all the rest of it. But finally in 1978 there was a newspaper article in the Dallas Morning News by newsman Earl Goultz and he basically said that he talked to Arnold and Arnold said, “Oh, I’m surprised what my FBI statements were. I saw Oswald in the second floor lunchroom about 12:25.” And in the movie JFK, they actually have him test her testifying at the Clay Shaw trial. Well, she never testified in the Clay Shaw trial, right? The first time she made that statement was 70 1978. This is, you know, 15 years later and it was sensational information. Earl Bolts wrote the other article and I I’ll send you a copy of it so you can put it up if you want. Sure. Yeah. And um wrote that article and we’re supposed to believe again secondhand information. Earl Gulz, the reporter said she said this. We never heard from Carolyn Arnold directly herself. The first two statements were FBI statements and subject to perjury. The last one 15 years later and it’s completely different statement. So some of the people believe some of the researchers that Oswald was in the second floor run the entire time, but there’s no strong evidence of that. Just some witness statement 70 15 years later, right? And so that’s not much of an alibi, but that’s the alibi I hear most often. Again, even if Oswald was in the second floor the entire time, we still have the problem of how does your shooter or anyone planning a weapon or anything else get in and out of the building without being seen by any of the employees? The movements, again, the elevator was open at certain times, but there were movements in the building. No one ever saw Oswald. Right. Right. Yeah. Very good point. Very Yeah, absolutely. Very, very interesting. So, we’re going to move back into the lunchroom again. So, I’m This is the view from the stairs looking at the lunchroom door. And again, there’s a little vegetable door that went into the hallway. If you went right down the hallway, you would end up going down into the secretar’s area. If you went left into the hallway, there’s another door going into the lunchroom itself. Second floor layout. Okay. And so, this is the lunchroom. Now, in the movie JFK, and I’ll bring it up a couple times, JFK, they said they had Oswald, they showed a picture of Oswald standing in this doorway waiting for a phone call, that he was just an unknowing psy and he was in this lunchroom. And waiting for a phone call was his reason for being a lunchroom. If if you’re going to set up Oswall as a psy, let’s play what if for a second. You have three problems. Number one, you got to get yourself your people in and out, your shooters or planting weapons, whatever they’re doing, in and out of the building without being seen as strangers by any of the 72 employees that could have been anywhere in the building at any given moment. Number one problem. Number two, you’ve got to not be seen as strangers by Oswald, who’s the pathy. If he somehow sees a stranger in the building, he might suspect he’s being set up and then establish an alibi or even turn to somebody and say, “Who’s that guy?” [clears throat] The third problem, of course, is you’ve got to control Oswalt. Well, in the movie JFK, they’re controlling Oswalt by making him wait for a phone call as if they could just tell, “Well, why don’t you stand in the lunchroom and wait for a phone telephone call?” Well, there was no pay phone in the lunchroom. There were no phones in the lunchroom. And I’ve got pictures both sides of the lunchroom, both ends. And there were no pictures in this lunchroom or phones in this lunchroom at all. Pay phones were expensive in ‘ 63. You didn’t put them in a low traffic area at all. Um, so if Oswald’s waiting for a phone call, it would have to be an outside phone, maybe at Mrs. Robert Reed’s desk, which would be the closest desk to the lunchroom in the back of the thing. Well, he didn’t know that number. So it would if you’re setting up Oswald by making him wait for a phone call on that phone, he might get suspicious. Why am I waiting for this phone? First of all, you would have to know the number to call it. And secondly, well, why are you making me call on that phone? This is the layout of the first floor again. Now, it’s the opposite of what it was before. So, at this point, the main entrance, the upper left, and the stairs are in the lower right. It was the other way around, the other side, but this was the Frasier exhibit. And he talks about where that phone is. and it’s marked A in the center of this. So B is the small storage room and C is the domino room and this photo and that is the phone that Oswald and the warehouse workers used. So that’s the phone Oswald would know the number to. So if he’s going to wait for a phone call and you don’t want to raise suspicion, then you’ve got to have him waiting there for a phone call. Well, also at this location, Oswell can see anybody entering the building, whether it’s from the back door by the dock, the side door, you know, back on the west side or the front door. If they’re walking through this open area, because it is completely open area except for the shipping tables and columns, there were 6×6 support columns in the middle of every floor. Um, then he would be able to see anybody walking in and out of the building. So, you’ve got to be aware of that when you talk about sneaking someone into the building, either co-conspirators or maybe Oswald even helped them into the building. But again, you still run the risk of being seen by any of the 72 employees in the building. All of which stated in commission document 1381, they did not see any strangers in the building at all except for Danny RC, how he pronounced. Yeah. So that’s just what you kind of have to be used to or what you have to think through is the logistics. And a lot of people don’t go through the logistics. The conspiracy theorists say, “Well, it was Mac Wallace on this floor or Mac, you know, or someone else on this floor or they just planted rifle on this floor.” Well, you got to think about the logistics problem. You can’t just plan an episode like that. I mean, I’ve seen Mission Impossible, too. I know anything’s possible, but still, it’s it’s doubtful. It’s not something, you know, that it’s just easily done. We just say, “Well, he must have been there.” Now, again, I’ve talked to some some people that believe every one of the employees of Texas School Book Depository ran out. Um, some of them believe because David Harold Bird, DH Bird is what he used to go by. The Dallas Petroleum Club used to teach teasing that DH stood for dry hole. But David Bird was part of the petroleum club and he was extreme rightwing. He did not like Kennedy. And so some people think, well, he was in on it and all the employees of the building were lying and all the employees of the building, you know, why why would they be lying? It’s just kind of weird because some people go off the deep end and just go really crazy with that. So, we’re not going to talk about them too much. I’m going to go to the third floor just to show that it’s basically all offices. What we’re while we’re at it, I’ll show you the basement. There was a set of stairs in the middle of the basement or you can sign bottom center that came down to the first floor. And if you look at the first floor layout, you will see the stairs coming down was the basement. It doesn’t really figure in this whole lot, but the elevators, freight elevators did go to the basement and that was pretty much it. The little box on the right, bottom right there is basically where the passenger elevator landed. So that’s what that box is. But the basement doesn’t do a whole lot for the uh story, so we won’t spend much time on it or the third floor. Jack Kase’s wife wrote a book, and in that book, she does have the inside of Jack Kase’s office, which was the second floor, but we don’t really have any pictures the inside of the third floor or the fourth floor. So, I’m going to kind of just skip past them, just include them so it doesn’t feel like I’m leaving anything out. So, we’re going to talk next about the sniper nest and the view from the window. So, this is the view from down Houston Street. And I’ve [snorts] had a lot of people when I give tours and I think in the movie JFK they have the actor who plays Lou Ivonne I believe um talking to the actor for Jim Garrison and it says well the only reason for not shooting him while he’s approaching on Houston Street which he calls an easy shot is to get him in a crossfire. Well that’s a reason. I’m not sure it’s the only reason. First of all Oswald is not professional sniper. I mean, if you got have a sniper like uh Craig Roberts, who wrote a couple different books on the Oswalt shooting and I’ve talked to in the past, Medusa Files and a couple others, another one, and he basically could possibly shoot the president of United States with his wife sitting right next to him while they’re looking at him. But it’s not sure that Oswald had that much nerve to do that. Um, again, Oswald has never shot anybody. He accidentally shot himself in the Marines with a daringer, but he’s not actually shot anybody that we know of during his military service or any other time, even [snorts] though he had been trained in the Marines to some degree. So, it’s not the easy shot that some people want to think it is. But yeah, if you did shoot at Kennedy coming at you, you would have and you missed, you still had a chance to shoot again instead of him moving straight away from you. Although although you do have uh all the Secret Service coming right at you. Yes. So, and that’s the other thing is he may have even intended to shoot down Houston Street, but the alignment of the boxes he was using as a gun rest and we’ll look at that in a second don’t seem to indicate that because they were at an angle and you could also hide behind that. And that’s the third problem. The third reason for not shooting on Houston Street, you got to remember this is not only have Secret Service, it has police, it has about 350 of the public standing on both sides of that road. They’re all watching the limo. So if you shoot from here and raise attention, everyone’s going to be looking at the building. If you wait till they turn the corner, they’re not going to be quite as certain where the shots came from because of the echo in Dly Plaza, etc. So, I’m not sure exactly what Oswald’s shooting sniper training was in the military in the Marines, but I’m pretty sure, you know, he it’s not that easy a shot. And also, if you’re trying to get away, then you have to worry about all those people, all those police officers, all the Secret Service looking right at you when you take a shot. So, instead, next slide, he took a shot down this angle. And this is pretty much the angle moving away from you. And again, the limo, but this time is going straight away from you. It’s not a hard shot. Talking about Craig Roberts is he basically said when they were sniper in Vietnam, they had a problem. And whenever they shot from a high position to a low, they couldn’t understand why the bullet went lower than where they were aiming. The scope is a line on a flat plane looking flat. And you actually shoot above where you’re looking so that it can arc with gravity down a little bit. It doesn’t move a whole lot. based on the speed of the bullet, but it does arc. So most weapons are sighted in on a flat plane, flat trajectory. And so by the time they hit their target, they the arc is minimal depending on how far away it is. If you’re going to shoot farther away, you actually lifted your well adjusted your scope or in the old thing lifted a a metal sight where you would shoot higher at the butt of the rifle, which means the front tip was pointing more upward because it would be more arc. So, anyone shooting high to low, they have a tendency not to to hit. They always hit below where they’re shooting because the rifle is sighted in with the scope and even your normal sights at a flat trajectory. and if shooting high to low, gravity’s not affecting the bullet at all. So you have a tendency to shoot higher than what you’re aiming. So in this case, he may have missed and hit Connelly instead. So I just kind of mentioned all that in passing. So that’s pretty much the views going out the window. So we’re going to talk about the sixth floor a little bit more now. And it’s pretty much down again the same trajectory looking a little bit closer to the window. Those dots are all the impacts reported select committee on assassinations that I mentioned before. I just include this one again. And you can see the round circle matches the circle in the Warren report where they shot through a telescope or phone through a telescope. And you see so the car would pretty much match what that circle shows. And so these are the missed impacts reported to the out house select committee on assassinations. Again, evidence of other shooters if more than two of them happened. Again, not strong evidence. It’s just 15 13 years later reports the House Select Committee on Assassination got it. But it is evidence as weak as it is. So kind of going to the next one. We’re going to talk about the sixth floor itself. Again, there were serious posts throughout this building. It was all warehouse space. The front uh the fourth floor, the back of the fourth floor, the fifth floor, and the sixth floor were all warehouse space. It’s pretty much storage space. And this particular thing, the stairs are in the back upper left and the two freight elevators. And then the sniper’s nest was in the front corner in that front window, the alleged sniper sniper nest. And so this is looking east or down the south wall. This is the front. These windows are all the front windows of the Texas School Book sixth floor. And this is looking down that front wall. And they had moved the boxes away from the windows because it would rain occasionally. They didn’t want them to get wet. and they were working on overlaying the plywood floors with wood or plywood the floors with plywood. They were not changing the floors, they were overlaying. So, real quick, let me talk about the floors. There was a work crew that was working on the floors and they were all employees in the movie JFK. Once again, they kind of cheat. They let actually Jerry Patrick Heming who was a soldier fortune that did with the anti-Castro Cubans and he pretty much played a guy in the movie where the work crew coming in from outside and he’s walks up to the sniper nest and he’s unpackaging a rifle in that brief shot of him. He doesn’t have any dialogue, but that’s actually Jerry Patrick Hamming for those of you who watch JFK just so you know that. But this is away from the windows and they did not have an outside work crew. There were six employees working crew. So the pretty much the employees were Harold Norman Harold Norman, Bonnie Ray Williams, Bill Shelley, Bill was a supervisor, Bill Lovely, the other two individuals, Danny Arc and Charles Given. Those were the six employees that were overlaying the floor. There was no outside crew. Again, 72 employees. No one talked about the employees in the building. So, this is the Now, the far end of this, it’s really hard to see here, and I do have close-up pictures of it, is a two-he cart on the far end away from us. And the two wheel cart was where Bonnie Ray Williams pretty much sat and had his lunch when he came up on the floor. He had been working the work crew. They raced the floor, the elevators down to the bottom floor. They went to the restroom, cleaned up because they’ve been working dusty and so on and so forth. And that was about no a few minutes before 12 about 10 till 12 something like that. And Charles Given the only one who came back up because he had after he cleaned up and stuff he came out back about 12:05. We’re starting to get into the movements in the building and he pretty much took the elevator back up and he came back to get his cigarettes. So let’s let’s keep working on the 64 and then we’ll come back to that. This is the sniper nest from a couple rows over again. Number 28 28 and this is sniper nest from a couple rows over. This is from the second row over and you can see the sniper west off in the distance. A lot of people forget about the little al cove over there with the pipe where Oswell could hide around the side. And I know on last week’s episode you showed an overhead shot of it. So if you want to show that one that’s fine, too. But I just include this so you can kind of see it um from a distance. There was a stack of boxes in front of the sniper nest. So much that you could not get through the sniper nest from the west side, which is the side we’re shooting this from, or this photo is taken from. You had to go around the east side around the boxes to get into the sniper nest. But this is it from the middle of the floor kind of looking at there was a little area over there in the corner Roswell could kind of hide from view if he wasn’t squared up in the window taking the shot on Houston Street. So that’s the reason I included it here. This is kind of the overview overhead view of it. So he was sitting on that box right there in the corner or towards the corner behind that stack of boxes and then he used these boxes as a rest and that’s also where the paper bag was allegedly found. They never really took a picture of the paper bag in this area but this is pretty much where that was done from and where slide 28T I believe. Yeah. But you could not actually enter the sniper nest except from that side, that far side. And that’s the east side there up top of the screen. And you could not enter from the west side because the row of boxes there were full. So I’m kind of including the boxes. This is the bo row of boxes according to the palace police before Studebaker moved some. So there’s a whole row of boxes blocking the access and there were stacks of boxes there. And then on the left you had to go around that stack. It was actually kind of a double wall that you had to kind of walk in from the west side and then zigzag to get back into the sniper nest. So those are the boxes the way they originally configured and originally appeared. And this was slide 29. And so from 30 you can see this is one of the photos taken by Studebaker in of the sniper nest when he got done processing it. Now, it was not taken when the sniper’s nest was first found. So, we’re gonna get into Tom Aier a little bit here. Tom Aier was the film photographer that got into the building before the police sealed it off. The police sealed off the building by about 1238 according to DV Hartness, one of the police officers in in part of it, in charge of it. And so, Tomier got into the building before that. And if you ever see black and white film of them searching the building and them finding the rifle and day brushing the rifle off, that’s Tom Alier’s film. Now Tom had some problems. He uh was using a borrowed camera. He had been in Fort Worth that morning. His camera was acting up. So he went to a stringer. Camera guy is not necessarily employed by the newspaper. They’re kind of freelance and that’s what they used to call stringer. He went to a stringer over in Fort Worth that he knew and borrowed a camera. So he had the camera with him when the [clears throat] when the sniper’s nest was first found by Luke Mooney at about 105. He asked Fritz. Now um said he could look over into the sniper nest and you could see the three shells on the ground all close together where you can lay hand and cover all three. Now, according to Oay, he asked Fritz, who was with him, if he could go into the sniper nest and film the the position of the bullets and so on so forth. Fritz said, “No, you shouldn’t be back there, but I tell you what, why don’t you reach over and film over the boxes? Film straight down.” Well, he did that. And so Fritz thinking he had photos of and this is all according to Oy and I can’t verify he passed away in 2014 but he said Fritz then reached down and grabbed the shells and showed him in his palm of his hand the three shells casings so that all could film them. All then said Fritz threw the shells in his pocket. Now, this surprised a lot of people, but it’s very seldom you find fingerprints on shells. Shell casings, most of the fingerprints come from the oil in the hands or dirt and oil. And if a shell casing heats up enough to explode the bullet, they will burn off the fingerprints. So, very seldom will you find shell casings with fingerprint. And so, this is all according to Alier. Now, Oier had two additional problems. Number one, it was dark in the depository. It didn’t have a flash. He didn’t have a light fixture with him and so we’re not sure if the pictures ever turned up. Secondly, he was losing the loop in his camera. Every once in a while he had to go find a dark place, open the camera up and re, you know, reloop it, tighten the loop a little bit. So where it went around the sprocket, it used to jump. And if you ever see that film, you see it start to jump a little bit. That’s because he was losing his loop. Third, he did not get out of the depository himself to process the film. He threw the film out to a co-orker standing in front of the building and they took a WFAA television and processed or souped the film. And so a lot of his film ended up on the cutting room floor. We don’t know what’s on it. The guy processing the film didn’t know what’s on it. So a picture of Hier’s film of him showing the sniper nest position of the bullets never showed up. nor did any film or picture of Fritz holding his hand out for the sniper nest for the showcase for all to film again. He kept filming through the building until he filmed it and he threw it back out. Now all you know he was writing a book at one point and I was helping him edit it. He has been published at least once. Connie Kitsburg put out a book called Secrets of the Sixth Floor and Oier wrote a chapter in that and I’m not sure if you have the book or not but um it’s a rare book. It’s all paper. It’s not easy to find. He was published but he was publishing a book or writing of a book and I was helping him edit it but then he got bored with it and stopped returning my emails and so the book never got printed. I do have PDF copies of the book, but I’ve never had permission from the family and never even contact the family to release it. So, I’ve not done anything with it. But just to make you aware, he was writing a book at one point. He says that that Studebaker, he who he didn’t have much use for. Then when he came in with Lieutenant Carl Day and they found the rifle um back on the other corner, opposite corner, they he took pictures of the rifle in place and then Oier took film of the rifle being picked up by Carl Day and Fritz and they’re examining the rifle and all the rest of that and it’s on his film and then he says Fritz or Yeah. Fritz then turned to Studebaker, the rookie in the crime lab. He was a sergeant, so he wasn’t a complete rookie, but he was in the crime lab. He handed the Michelle’s and said, “Go process the sniper nest.” And so Studebaker came over and pro started processing the sniper nest. Now, we get into Roger Craig here. Roger Craig at one point said that he walked over the sniper nest while Studebaker was processing it and he found saw all three shell casings laying in a row in the window seal. Well, that kind of makes sense. If you’re Studebaker, you’re not going to be tripping around shell casings on the floor while you’re processing a sniper lab. So, he would lay them on the window sill until he was ready to do something with put them in an evidence bag or whatever he was going to do. So, it’s not surprising. Now, according to Oier, Studebaker then moved one row of books. And again, the previous picture, we pretty much showed the row of the books. I can go back that if anybody wants to see it, but you could not get in that bottom corner, right? That bottom picture, you could not get in from that side. But this next picture again that we’re looking at, you can see in that side. And you can So Studebaker had moved some stacks of books out of the way to take this picture. And and you can also see fingerprint dust on this on these books, these boxes. So yes, it’s been processed. And according to Oay, Fritz came back over and said, “Did you take a picture yet?” And Studebaker said, “No, I I haven’t.” And so Fritz threw the shell casings on the floor and said, “Take your pictures.” And so Studebaker took pictures, but the shell casings on the floor were not in that position according to. So take that for whatever it’s worth. I just kind of include in here. Right. Now, the sniper’s nest was found about 10:05 and then about 1:30 or so, the rifle was found. So, Studebaker was processing the sniper nest up until about 2:00. A little maybe a little bit after he was fingerprinting, moving boxes, dusting for fingerprints, etc. And you can see him from the outside, some of the photos taken outside, you can see him processing the sniper. You can see Studebaker a few times in these windows. We don’t know for sure because back in those days, these pictures did not have timestamps. However, if you look out the window here, you can see a station wagon. And I don’t know if it’s a new station wagon or an ambulance or what it was, but I think it was a new station wagon. And the station wagon is facing on Houston Street towards the north. So again, Elm Street and Houston Street, Elm Street Extension and Houston Street are squared up. They’re 90 degrees from each other. So what I did is I did a study on shadows. This is basically old style, but this is old style like uh sundial type of study. So you can kind of see using the square truck you can see that there’s about 60° is really we know that truck is square or rectangular. So the blue line shows where 90° should be, but this because of perspective it shows up as 60°. So if you take those same degree marks and move them over on that station wagon, the shadow is about halfway from 90 degrees. So that shadow which looks like 30° right now if you assume you know the because of perspective it’s going to be a sharper angle is 30 degrees. Well, I did a time study in Dy Plaza where I brought protractors and you know a little rod to kind cast a shadow and measured all the shadows. This photo was appears to have been taken about 12:10 in the afternoon or 2:10, excuse me, 2:10. So again, it kind of supports this idea that Studebaker took this picture after he processed the sniper nest and moved some boxes and it was late, not originally a picture of exactly when Studebaker or when the crime scene was first discovered. Any any questions on that at all? No, I’ve been droning on for an hour. Yeah, it’s not quite an hour, but okay. So, now we’re going to kind of move a little bit and just for the heck of it, I’m gonna show the diagram of the seventh floor. I’ve had like Lamar Lamar Waldron suggest that maybe they hid up in the seventh floor. This is basically a diagram of the seventh floor. Yeah. And there was a little store room in the front. Again, it was used for excess storage. There wasn’t a lot going on up there and there wasn’t anything that really fits in the action, but I included just to make sure I include everything in our discussion. And this is picture number 31 for those of you keeping track and trying to keep up. And I’ve got a couple pictures of the interior of the seventh floor so you can kind of see what they were like. Um, this next one, 32, is basically what it was like back in the time. You can see it has a fairly low ceiling. There was actually a crawl space up above that ceiling and There was a police officer as always I always kind of tease him. His name was Paul Wilkins and they made him crawl through that crawl space with a flashlight looking for shooter. According to Oay the police officers, which we’ll get into in a second, kind of did the building in two waves. The first wave looking for the shooter. Of course, they rushed to the building looking for a shooter. Of course, Baker came up and looked for the shooter and went all the way to the roof and then they came back down and got organized and then kind of walked through the building looking for evidence and that’s when they discovered the sniper’s nest and the rifle. Okay, so next photo real quick. This is the seventh floor. This is that front corner room. This is number 33 for those of us keeping track. And this is kind of this crawl space was not in the front of the building, this office space. Um, so it’s no longer there. So the windows, you can see go a little bit higher all up the ceiling. And so a few years ago, I had uh the oral historian Steven Fagan let me take a picture of the seventh floor. And you can see these cross beams across the top. That’s where the crawl space used to be. And you can actually see Steven in the bottom right left corner. and he’s 5 foot five or 5 foot six I believe and he’s standing under that crawl space. So there was a crawl space up there and they pretty much look for shooters through there. So we’re going to kind of go through the rest of um the building. We’re going to talk about the fifth floor. We’re going to get into the movements of the employees. Now the movements of the employees are based on three things. Basically the warrant commission interviews of each of the employee also commission document 1381 where the employees were asked in March and April of 64 you know all the five questions who are you where you work so on so forth where were you at the time of the shooting did you see Oswald that morning did you see any strangers in the building and what time did you leave those five questions the first group we’re going to talk about are the three workers that were on the fifth floor. This is Bonnie Ray Williams, Junior Garman, Harold Norman or Hank Norman. And so we’re going to kind of talk about that. They were in the windows in the front of the building, which is the bottom of the building. Here you can also see the control of the lift mechanism for the elevator, the passenger elevator that went on only up to the fourth floor. Oh, the other document a lot of this is based on is the police reports to Captain Galloway and also the police reports for the sheriff’s, Sheriff Decker. Um, that’s commission exhibit 5323 if you ever want to read all the police reports. So, this is the fifth floor. We’re going to talk talk a little bit about the movement of the elevators and the movement of the employees in the building based on those three sources. The first one we’re going to do is we’re going to talk about the guys in the fifth floor. Uh, Junior Garman, Hank Norman, and Bonnie Ray Williams went down the lunchroom, you know, a little bit before noon, pretty much grabbed their lunch or grabbed their sandwiches or whatever. Bonnie Ray Williams went back up to the sixth floor because then in the conversation that morning, they kind of had said, “Well, this would be a good place to watch the motorcade or the parade go by.” And so, Bonnie Ray Williams came back up the sixth floor and he pretty much ate his chicken bone sandwich and had his Dr. Pepper. Um, and he sat there and ate his lunch. He got back up there about 12:05, 12:10. And he sat and ate his lunch till about 12:25 when he went looking for Hank Norman and Junior Dar. The two of them went down out front and they were out front in front of the building, but they heard on the police radio that motorc was coming down Main Street. So, they decided to go back into the building. They went around to the dock entrance and then went back into the building and went up to the fifth floor. So when Bonnie Ray Williams came down, he searched the fifth floor and he found them. And so both elevators were pretty much on the fifth floor when the shooting occurred, just pretty much stuck on the fifth floor. Two of the guys coming up, one of them going down. The other one I mentioned very briefly was Charles Given. Charles Given also went down with the sixman lane crew a little bit before 12. Came back up to 12:05 because he had forgotten his cigarettes and his coat, his jacket. It was warmer in the afternoon than had been that morning. So, he’s got his cigarettes. He saw Oswald coming from the front corner of the building. And he kind of asked him, well, you know, are you going to lunch? Oswald said maybe down in a minute. So, he was coming from the sniper nest area according to Charles Given. And Oswald basically said, “Well, when you get down there, make sure the elevator doors are closed so I can call the elevator when I want to come down.” And Charles Given took the elevator. We’re assuming it’s the east elevator, the manual one, and went down to the first floor. And he walked around and looked at the elevator and all this is 12:05, 1210. The elevator was gone. So, it could be that Bonnie Ray Williams went back up to the sixth floor to eat his lunch at 12:10. We’re not sure the exact time. He probably sat there for 15 minutes with Oswald just on the other side of the wall from him waiting to do the shoot or the shooter if you prefer to think it’s not Oswald. Again, I don’t care. Um, so the fifth floor, then they came up to the fifth floor. Now, again, this is the back of the fifth floor. Now, some people ask Jack Dhy. I almost skipped over Jack. Jack went back to work about 12:30 about. He’s not sure exactly the time. and he was filling an order and he came up and he filled the order on the fifth floor or sixth floor. He couldn’t remember which, but he was probably filling an order. He said he was standing a few feet from the elevator when he heard a backfire, a single backfire sound. So, he only heard one shot. For some reason, he thought it sound like a backfire. Of course, it was in the building, but he heard a backfire. So, he finished filling his orders and he went on downstairs to see what’s happening. Um, this is a picture from the west side. The three guys after the shooting, this is 36. 36. So, this is 36. This is looking along the west side. Anyway, the three guys moved to the west corner of the building, the southwest corner of the building, looked out the side window. Uh, Junior Garman and Hank Norman closer to the window. Bonnie Ray Williams was kind of standing back a little bit. Bonnie Ray Williams did not see Oswalt. He did not see anyone moving up down the stairs, but he did see eventually Baker and Truly cross the stairs and go to the elevator. Well, that window you see all the way back in the background is the ele or the window between the stairs and the elevator. And you can see the view of the stairs is blocked by stacks of box boxes of books. So, it makes sense that Jack Jordy wouldn’t necessarily see somebody walking on the stairs or running down the stairs because that stack of boxes would be blocking his view or could be blocking his view. And you can actually see Bonnie Ray Williams in silhouette in that window because at the time this was taken. And again, this number um that’s where he was standing. Those were the three guys were standing. And you can see that stack of boxes on the far left which would have blocked the view of the stairs. So anyone coming down those stairs from six and then crossing over to the left behind that wall would not be seen by the boxes in that area. So that’s the reason Jack Dohy and Bonnie Ray Williams did not see Oswald move. Okay. So we’re going to go to the fourth floor now. We’re going to talk about the women and the girls on the stairs. Um this is Sandra Styles and Vicky Adams were at the front of the stairs. the second set of windows over over at the front of the building. Watching that’s the bottom here and they were in the office section. The fourth floor was unique because it had storage in the back on the warehouse storage and then supplies over in the far left in this picture and then it had offices for Scott’s foreman employees. So they’re that publishers’s office is up there and Vicky Adams and Sandra Styles were working for Scott Foreman and they were also joined by Elsie Dorman and Dorothy Gardner. Elsie Dorman took the Dorman film which you can see inside the building and she did not look through the shutter. It’s one of the worst films taken because it’s all too high to see the present limo. Also in the rest of the building, in the front of the building, there was also the employees Foster Holly’s Hobson and Ruth Smith Nelson. And there were the eight women on the front of the fourth floor [clears throat] right after the shooting. Um, and the girl in the stairs, again, a book by uh Barry Ernest, he talks about the movement of these girls. So, we’re going to talk about briefly. So, we’re going to go here. This is Vicky Adams testimony. And Vicky Adams is asked about three times here. The first one is, “How long do you think it was between the time the shots were fired and the time you left the window to start towards the stairway?” And the response is underlined there between 15 and 30 seconds estimated approximately. And then she was asked, it’s kind of crossed out there, I can’t quite read it. How long do you think it make it took you to get from the window to the top of the fourth floor stairs? She answers, “I don’t think I can answer that question accurately because the time approximation without a stopwatch would be difficult.” And we’re not sure what path she took. And we’ll go back to the drawing in just a second. But this is her testimony. And this is number 39 for those of you keeping track. And then the Mr. repeats it again and this time he says window. Now he had just asked about how long it took you to decide to move. And then the second question he actually changed it back and said um second question he said how long to get from the window to the stairs. And then he comes back with from the window down to the first floor. Well she may not caught the window on that particular side of the question. So she said I would say no longer than a minute at the most. But then he repeats the question. So you think it took you go from the window on the fourth floor and the time you got to the stairs the bottom of the first floor was approximately 1 minute. Now she comes back and says yes approximately. It’s no longer less than a minute but it’s yes approximately. So many researchers very much only used one time and they say well it only took her a minute from the head shot all the way down the bottom of the stairs. Well, I don’t buy that. On the and this is page 281 of volume six of the Warren Commission. Okay. And the page before she actually said she was in three-inch heels, her and Sandra Styles both. Well, you can imagine the noise made by 3-in heels on those wooden stairs with wooden walls as they’re going down. There’s two of them, and they’re not trying to walk quietly. They have no reason to walk quietly. And she did tell Barry Ernest, according to his book, that she thinks she would have at least heard Oswell moving. But if Oswald was ahead of her, I have my doubt she would hear it. They came down the bottom of the stairs. They probably crossed paths with Baker and Truly. They never saw Baker and Truly. They never saw Oswalt. They didn’t see anybody on the stairs. and Elsie Dorman, I’m sorry, Dorothy Garner, their supervisor, followed them back to the back of the fourth floor, at least out of the office spaces, and said she heard them going down the stairs. She knows when they came to the stairs. She was standing there talking to Elsie Dur. And she eventually saw Baker and Truly coming up the stairs, emerging from the stairs on their way and going up the stairs to the fifth floor where they got the elevator, went up to the roof or went up to the seventh floor, completely bypassing the sixth floor, by the way. Just throw that in there. So, Baker and Truly did not see the girls either. So, that kind of gets to be a problem a little bit. So, we’re pretty much saying that it took, according to my calculations, if you add all those times together, anywhere from a minute and a half to a minute and 40 seconds. Again, assuming that they’re wearing 3-in heels and they’re probably moving down the stairs a little bit clo quicker, slower than Oswald would. dark stairs. Then it took probably about a minute and 40 is what I come up with. Now that is supported by two other witnesses and that would be Bill Shelly and Bill Lovely. Bill Shelley and Bill Lovely said they were standing out front and they decided to hurry to the grassy null to see if they could see anything. They got to the grassy null and they didn’t. So they turned and I’m going to the next slide which I think is 40. Yeah, 40. And so they turned, they came along the front of the building to the railroad yards there and then they didn’t see anything. So they walked in and came into that west dock entrance that’s there behind the overhang in this picture. And Shelly basically said it would be between a one and a half and two minutes for the entire trip. And Love Lady said it was a minute and a half at the most. It was within less than one and a half minutes. So that means they were down the first floor. So when Sandra Styles and Vicky Adams emerged from the first floor stairs down there, they would have seen Shelly and Love Lady. And in her testimony, she did say she saw Shelly and Love Lady or at least Shel, Mr. Shel. Now the girls came out the dock exit and walked around. They said they got to the first railroad track and there was a police officer there that said no, you need to go back in. So they went ahead and walked around the west side of the building here down the railroad and they came back in the front of the building. And then they went up the stairs to the second floor directly in that little lobby. So they did not go back and see truly I’m sorry they did not see um Shelly at that time and they went up the second floor. Later on, they tried to go up to the fourth floor and they got on the freight elevator, but the freight elevator didn’t work. And it was with police officers and they got up to the fourth floor and they visited with the other ladies and they eventually left the building somewhere between one and two. So those are the movements of the employees and the stairs. Now the other thing that I talk about in my book is the detectives and this deputy sheriff’s their movements. again, a number of them. Baker was the only one that came into the building early right after the shots because he had seen pigeons flying off the roof of the building and thought pigeons were being, you know, there must have been a shooter either on the roof or up high. And he came in the building and I’ve had some police officers say, “Well, you should have waited and called for backup.” Well, at the time he left his motorcycle or Curry was telling people, the chief of police, get people in the overpass, see what’s going on up there. So, he was ordering men on the overpass. So Baker did not contradict him and say, “No, I think it’s the building.” Instead, he went on his own trying to catch somebody. I I get that question all the time. Why didn’t they seal off the [clears throat] plaza? Why didn’t they make it a crime scene? Well, it takes coordination. You got to remember 63, everyone did not have radios on their shirt. Yeah, they did not have personal radio. So, if you were away from your squad car or three-wheeler or motorcycle, you pretty much out of communication. there’s no way to coordinate seal off a plaza with about 500 people in it as a crime scene. So Baker rushed into the building and he went up the stairs. The other thing that comes up is the detectives and I cover it in my book. There’s a whole section on detectives and positor. So real quick because I know we’re going long here. I want to talk about that the movements that we know about. And at least Luke Mooney when he comes up says he encounters two deputy sheriffs. He doesn’t name them on his way up. And some people bring that up as these are suspic suspicious movements. Well, we know that Paul Walters said in his report, and again this is um Decker exhibit 5323, that he was in the building and Graham staff and Webster, two other detectives, called down the sun, said, “We need flashlights.” So Mooney and Graham staff left, went down the stairs to go get flashlights. They brought flashlights back and Grahamstaff doesn’t return but Web or Wal Walters does. Again, don’t be confused with Buddy Walths with an H. And this is Paul Wal Walters, right? And he returns with um Boone who had taken Betts to the sheriff’s office with his film. And so he didn’t get into the building until that point. And he returns with Boone and Smith. And so there’s at least two officers that were coming down the stairs about the time Mooney may have been coming up. Also, John Wiseman, another one of the deputy sheriffs, he said he went from six down to two a few times to organize the second search, the one for evidence. So those are pretty much the movements of the detectives in there, and that’s also covered in my book. Now, I I cover a lot more of the movements inside. We’re pretty much done here, but I’m going to bring up this one. This is the graph that come appears on page 269 in my book and I think it’s in your Flimflam book. Anyway, this is kind of a layout of all those movements we just talked about. And again, it’s all speculation. There were no video cameras, close capt. But the recreations are on the right. Baker recreated twice with the Warren Commission. One time it took him a minute and 30 seconds. One time it took him a minute 15. Oswald’s path was recreated by a 23 24 year old Secret Service agent coming down from sixth floor, walking his way through the boxes, stashing the rifle, and coming down four flights of stairs to the second floor lunchroom. And that was a minute 17. The only place that Baker and Truly who were standing in a very confined area and very confined steps or confined area down at the bottom of the first floor while they’re calling for the elevator, they would see anyone coming up and down the stairs behind them. Also, Jack Dhy brought the elevator down after he filled his order and the elevator was there was was moving at some time while these girls were going down the stairs. The only time they all could cross each other is where those purple circles are. And that’s when Oswald, Baker, and Truly are in the lunchroom. And the girls cross the second floor, not seeing Truly or Baker or Oswald, and Dohy descends in the elevator, not seeing Oswald. That’s the only time that could occur without them seeing each other. So, that’s pretty much a walkthrough of the whole thing. Again, it’s featured in my book. I I covered the inside of the TSB with about four different chapters. So, that’s covered very heavily in my book and I sorry I’ve been droning on for so long. I think we’re at a little bit over an hour. Well, it’s okay. I mean, fantastic presentation. Um, the one question I have is what about the um the ceiling of the Texas School Book Depository uh after the after the shooting and uh the possibility that or Roger Craig I think somebody came out the back of the School Book Depository and then eventually got a lift in a Rambler on on Elm Street. Okay. Um, I wasn’t going to do a whole bunch of things, but Roger Craig did say there was a Rambler that picked up somebody that whistled that looked like Oswald. Now, again, Roger Craig did not know Oswald. So, anyone who looks similar to Oswald, he may have confused as Oswald. So, I’m answering your second question first. Yeah. Again, he didn’t know Oswald. So, it wasn’t like anybody that he knew for sure it was Oswald. He just looked like him. Not sure what your question was about the ceiling. Uh what when was the Texas Global Guitizer sealed off so that nobody could exit? Oh, the ceiling. That ceiling. I thought you saying ceiling with a C. What ceiling are you talking about? Um that’s DV Hartness. DV Hartness. Sergeant DV Hartness was one of the three officers at Elm in Houston. His basic job was to wait for the motorcade to get close. He had his three-wheeler close by and he would sit there and listen to the radio and the b radio was turned up and that might be the same radio that German and Norman heard when the uh motorcade was on Elm or Main Street. So they knew they had enough time to get up back to the fifth floor before the motorcade got there. But he was there and you know after the shooting he got on his three-wheeler he ran to the or drove it rode it to the grassy null and there he didn’t find anyone but the little um Euan’s teenager 15year-old teenager 15 I believe Amos Euans yeah he had run over the grassy null and he basically said well I saw a shooter up in the uh school book depository in that building and so Harkness you can see it on the uh on one of the films Hartness gave him a ride, put him on the back of his three-wheeler, sitting on the back of it, and gave him a ride back to the front and put him into um Sawier’s car, Inspector Sawer, and then and then he went and talked to Sawier and said, “There’s someone in your car.” Detective Sawyer, we need to talk to him about him very briefly, too. He was coming down. He came down Elm Street and in his car and parked right in front of the building. He got there about 12:35, 5 minutes after the shooting. And he went into the building. He went into the passenger elevator there in that front lobby. He said he took it to the top floor. The top floor would have been the fourth floor. So, he took it up to the fourth floor and then he walked across the floor, didn’t see anything, and came down the stairs in the back. Well, he probably wasn’t even aware at that time that there was a two floors above him still or three floors above him. Five, six, and seven. But he came down. He came out the front of the building. DV Hartness walks up and he, you know, they’ve sealed off the front because there’s officers there. So he turns to Hartness, he says, “Have you sealed off the back of the building?” Hartness says, “No, I haven’t. I’ll go take care of that.” So Hartness goes back to the dock entrance and allegedly as he went by there and according to his testimony, he ran to a couple people that he thought were Secret Service agents. Of course, there were no Secret Service agents on the ground, but on his way back there, he ran into someone that said they were Secret Service agent. He didn’t stop and he didn’t I didn’t see a badge flash, but he went back and he sealed off, he says he saw sealed off the building about 12:38. So, it took about eight minutes to completely seal off the dock door and the front door. Now, the door back by the west side, I’m not sure anyone was aware of that door at that time, but the girls when they came out, they said there was a police officer back there. So, it may have been one of the police officers searching the grass area, which is where most of the officers originally went and they may have noticed the back door. So, they got in position and watched that back door and they may have talked to the girls and sent them around to the front. So, does that answer the question you had on it? Yeah. Yeah. ceiling, not an upper ceiling. Yeah. Yeah. I know. I you know, and I I think it also it pairs with the fact that nobody saw any strangers um in the building as well. So, it was sealed off relatively quickly. Now, now just just for the sake of my conspiracy friends, some of my conspiracy friends, this is all based on testimony by those people. Now, some of the conspiracy friends, they don’t trust anything the FBI ever wrote. They don’t trust the Dallas Police Department. They don’t trust social sec, you know, Secret Service. They think everybody was in on it. And if you think everyone’s in on it, all this information is useless because we don’t know for sure what happened in the building. We’re not video camera cameras or any way of knowing. This is all just based on testimony. And again, this chart is speculation based on testimony. So, I take it or leave it. I’m just kind of walking through the building and kind of giving the idea based on what we have been told by different sources. Again, if you believe everyone’s lying to you, then I can’t really help you too much. You can pretty much do anything you want. You could have Mr. Scott beaming the shooters into position and beaming them back out. I don’t know. Were you Were you in the Texas Global Depository in the uh you know, before? I was not. I said I I was in Denver in third grade, even though I was under my stepfather’s last names, but that’s my alibi and I’m sticking to it.

Okay. So, I I also got a request from somebody. I think it was a comment on the last episode. Have the comment below that they were expecting me to go through the history of Daily Plaza. I did that my first book. It’s It’s boring. I mean, I could bore you to tears on that, but I don’t see the sense of an episode for that. So, I just kind of mentioned that in passing. I’m not planning on doing that. If he can somehow get a hold of me, I do have a few copies of that book left. If he wants to pay shipping and cost the book, I’d be more than happy to send one, but I’m not going to go into a lot of details on the history of the plaza. Right. Right. I’m fortunate that I have a copy of that book autographed by you. Um, yeah. Well, you know, that’s valuable. Yeah. I’ve got about another 105 if you want another one. [laughter] I haven’t autographed them all yet. They’re still sitting in boxes. Yeah, go autograph them and uh you can sell them. I self-published. Yeah, I self-published back in 2002 and I think it cost me 500 books, $5,000, but uh so I still got a bunch of them. So I still haven’t made a profit. A lot. It’s always funny people say everyone’s profiting off the assassination. Well, you know, my my recent book, three years old, maybe I’ve sold 150 col. Well, same thing for me. I mean, look, I I get people all the time who say, “Well, you know, you’re doing all this blogging because you just want to sell books.” I said, “I wish I wish my blog posts would sell books.” Yeah. Yeah. They don’t. I mean, if I’ve sold 150 copies, maybe I clear $4 a copy or something that, you know, Amazon pays me, you know, that’s 600 bucks. I could probably spend an extra day in Vegas for that as long as I have to pay a hotel bill. Yeah. So, so yeah. No, it’s not easy selling books. Uh particularly these days when people don’t read as much. Now I have, like I said, profited more than a lot of people have because I did tours. And while I’m mentioning, I’m no longer doing tours. I kind of want to mention that out here. Um I stopped probably in 2017. Um, and 2020 COVID, I pretty much killed it. I mean, I stopped it completely for COVID and I never really fired them back up again. So, I’m no longer doing paid tours, but I do know a lot of tour guides.

Matter of fact, I was the 2017 president of the Dallas Fort Worth area tour guide association. So, I can get you in touch with tour if you want one, but I stopped doing them several years ago. Y

ou were the best. You you’re you’re the best. I can tell you that. I still give them for friends and acquaintances occas it’s it’s f they’re fantastic. Well, thank you very much for this presentation.

[music]

Fred Litwin’s blog:
www.onthetrailofdelusion.com

Music by: Power Music Factory
Channel URL : / powermusicfactory
• [Suspense Music No Copyright]Suspense Background

JFK history buffs meetup, June 2026

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/06/29/jfk-history-buffs-meetup-june-2026/

I edited together a “Travel Documentary” of the “JFK Truth Be Told” members meetup in Dallas in June 2026. Perhaps it is better to describe this as some home videos stitched together in Adobe Premiere.

It starts off with members Steve and Bill visiting Wesley Buell Fraziers old car at the “Ripley’s Believe it or Not” museum in San Antonio Texas. This is the car that Lee Harvey Oswald rode to work in on November 22, 1963.

After this,Steve and Bill visited General Edwin A. Walker’s grave in Center Point Texas. I didn’t go with them this time. I went there a few years ago:

11:16- we visited the University of Texas Tower in Austin. I lived in Austin almost 20 years, but didn’t know the place as well as Bill did, he knew where snipers bullet holes were around the tower.

14:35 Bill Brown gives the group a tour of the Tenth and Patton Officer Tippit death scene.

15:41 visiting the site of the infamous “Backyard photos” on Neeley Street.

16:08 Tour Guide Dan Evans took the group into the “Oswald Rooming House”

16:13 at the RUTH PAINE HOUSE Museum in Irving, Texas,

21:05 Dinner with Buell Wesley Frazier and Dave Perry.

The Best “On the Trail of Delusion” Episodes

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/06/17/the-best-on-the-trail-of-delusion-episodes/

I always try my best on ALL of the “On the Trail of Delusion” Episodes, but these are ones that came out best. They best display my skills in editing and Motion Graphics/ Animation content creation.

I was never a fan of hour long “talking head” talk shows, and always want to add video and graphics to turn these shows into documentaries instead of uninteresting chat fests.


Adobe Photoshop, Adobe After Effects, and Adobe Animate were used to create the motion graphics/animation, and the final editing in Adobe Premiere.  I recently started using TOPAZ AI to turn the original 1280 by 720 footage into 3840 by 2160 (4K) video.

Episode 3, Gerald “Case Closed” Posner

Episode 5, Steve Roe on General Edwin Walker

Episode 11, Bill Brown on J.D. Tippit

Episode 20, The Marina Oswald Tapes

Dallas June 8th

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/06/08/dallas-june-8th/

Some preliminary footage from our Jfk Buff’s meet up in Dallas, June 8, 2026.

I handed my iPhone over someone else to get Video inside the Oswald rooming House Museum

Some small pieces of video that will be included in an upcoming episode of “On the Trail of Delusion“

www.youtube.com/@onthetrailofdelusion

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 34, Steve Barber on the acoustics evidence

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/04/07/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-34-steve-barber-on-the-acoustics-evidence/

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 34, Steve Barber on the acoustics evidence,

This podcast/ documentary episode started off as a 1280 by 720 ZOOM Call.

The small format video was upscaled to 4k (3840 by 2160) using Topaz AI.

Then I created the motion graphics with Adobe Photoshop and After Adobe Effects.

Steve Barber is an important figure in the JFK assassination.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_Dictabelt_recording

He was (IS!) a lifelong JFK buff who heard things in the infamous Dallas Police “Dictabelt” recordings that challenged the conclusions of the House Select Committee on Assassinations that there were sounds of a fourth shot.

He discussed his audio discovery and the stories of his interactions with many legendary figures on both sides of the Kennedy Conspiracy debate.

Video editing and motion graphics/animation by http://www.mattkprovideo.com

Episode 31, Josh Sundloff on Reason and Reality, On the Trail of Delusion

www.mattkprovideo.com/2026/03/02/episode-31-josh-sundloff-on-reason-and-reality-on-the-trail-of-delusion/

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 31, Josh Sundloff on Reason and Reality,

Josh Sundloff is the host of the popular Tik Tok show “Reason and Reality”


www.tiktok.com/@reason.reality

Music by: Power Music Factory Channel URL : / powermusicfactory • [Suspense Music No Copyright]Suspense Background

Video editing and motion graphics/ animation by Matt Kordelski https://mattkprovideo.com/


#Kennedy, #assassination, #Kennedy_assassination, #jfk, #conspiracy, #litwin, #fred_litwin, #1963, #dallas, #texas, #history, #tik_tok, #reason, #reality, 

Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald (1964)

www.mattkprovideo.com/2025/11/02/trial-of-lee-harvey-oswald-1964/

This film is a courtroom dramatization and examination of what might have happened had Lee Harvey Oswald been brought to trial for the murder of President John F. Kennedy.

The actor playing Wesley Buell Frazier was older than Frazier himself is now. The real Wesley Buell Frazier was only nineteen at the time.

http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trial_of_Lee_Harvey_Oswald_(1964_film)

Written, directed and produced by Larry Buchanan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Buchanan

Starring George Russell and George Edgley

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 24, Lawrence Haapanen on UFO’s, JIm Garrison, & the JFK murder

www.mattkprovideo.com/2025/09/29/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-24-lawrence-haapanen-on-ufos-jim-garrison-the-jfk-murder/

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 24, Lawrence Haapanen on UFO’s, Jim Garrison, & the JFK murder

TRANSCRIPT:

(INTRODUCTION:)

I want to thank everybody for coming this afternoon. My name is Fred Litwin.
Noted author Fred Litwin. And of course, Fred is also the author of I was a teenage JFK conspiracy freak, On the trail of delusion. and Oliver Stone’s film Flam. The demagogue of Dealey Plaza.
Fred Litwin is here. He’s a longtime author and certainly watcher of politics.
Joining us, Fred Litwin, great to have you here.
Thank you very much.

[Music]

Welcome to another edition of ON THE TRAIL OF DELUSION, where I try to separate the wheat from the chaff and try to give you something substantial on the JFK assassination rather than the usual gruel you find on YouTube and around the internet.
Today my guest is Larry Haapanan who is an historian out west um who’s been long involved with the JFK assassination.
He’s been involved with the military and investigating UFOs and he’s got a long career on the history side uh both JFK the presidency and the assassination. So welcome Larry. And uh first question is how did you get into the JFK assassination? Well, um I guess because it happened. Uh and at that time, November 22nd, 1963, I was attending u college at the University of Washington. I was a history major and um I also happened to be an ROTC cadet. So the day it happened, I was wearing my army uniform, Army ROC. I later shifted over to Air Force, but I I happened to be home for lunch and uh an older woman from down the hall knocked on the door and said she wanted to use our phone and apparently she was having trouble with hers and she said the president had been shot and of course I was dumbfounded and so I watched the coverage on TV for a while. Then I went to uh back to class. Everything was cancelled that afternoon and uh of course that whole weekend was kind of a you know a bewildering uh unreal kind of a experience uh all the way through the shooting of Oswald and the the funeral the following Monday in Washington. And uh so as a history major, I kind of perked up my ears and was, you know, paying maybe more attention than the average person to what seemed to be history in the making. I um in my teenage years, I was a kind of a Civil War buff and that peaked an interest in the Lincoln assassination, right? And I had a book by Otto Eisenchiml that I picked up at a secondhand bookstore. And uh you know, so I had I had a past interest in that. So the Kennedy assassination wasn’t the first one I got interested in, but I waited, you know, of course, uh eager to find out what the Warren Commission would decide, right? uh immediately after the report was made public, the networks, TV networks had special programs on the Warren Report and so I audio taped uh I think ABC’s special report right on that and for quite a long time then afterwards I was kind of you know pretty content to let the Warren report be a accurate summation, you know, of of what had happened. I guess maybe I wasn’t going as far as Gerald Ford when he said the Warren report would stand like a gibraler of factual literature through the ages to come. But nevertheless, during the years to come, I I uh pretty much um thought the War Report had dealt with it adequately. But then in 1966, I made the dubious choice, I guess, that that kind of changed my life in a way of of getting a copy of Rush to Judgment by Mark Lane right after it came out, right? And that made me think that perhaps there was a conspiracy. And so then I started delving into the 26 volumes at the university library you know and getting books by Weissberg for example and later Sylvia Maher and Edward j. Estein of course
nd looking you know what articles began to appear in magazines like look and ramparts and Saturday Evening Post and Minority of One and Esquire. Then of course in I guess February 1967, I was walking down a street in Los Angeles. I think I was there on a debate trip and you know there was a headline, Jim Garrison is investigating the assassination. So of course I began following the u the Garrison investigation which I probably will touch on later. So that’s how it happened. So yeah, I mean I mean Mark Lane was very very influential. I mean, did you start corresponding with some of these people back then? Uh, no, I didn’t. In 1967, I graduated and got my commission in the Air Force and went on active duty. From the money I got from my first paycheck, I ordered the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission. I hadn’t been able to afford the $76 before that. That doesn’t sound like a lot today, but back then it would be like a whole month’s rent. You know, it was many hundreds of dollars in today’s money. and and so I began researching the 26 volumes on my own. And then in 1968, I joined up with a couple of other guys from Seattle, my hometown, in the Washington State Citizens Committee of Inquiry. Then I began to meet, you know, know other people. You knew you knew George Renard from Seattle and Paul Hul and Halverb and Bill Turner in the Bay Area and Fred Nukem in Los Angeles and through him David Lifton and Ray Marcus I met uh William Costalano other people of that area and George Renar, right? You knew you knew George? Oh yeah, George Rener was a lifetime friend of mine. We Right. Yeah. I continued to uh know him for decades. He passed away in 2017 and and uh I really lost a friend when he passed away. Yeah, he has some of the more interesting letters and stuff uh that are out there. I don’t know if there’s anything more in his papers, but it was always interesting to read a George Rener uh letter. Well, yeah, he had a terrific sense of humor as did Fred Nukem. They they their letters would sometimes, you know, turn to satire and jokes. And George mailed uh Fred a dead cockroach on one occasion and that was named Andy. And you know, they they had in particular a real uh humorous uh take on things at time. What was your experience just curiosity with Raymond Marcus? Because I I sort of gather from some of his letters he seemed rather pedantic, but what what was your experience with Raymond Marcus? I met him once when he came over to Fred Nukem’s house and I happened to be staying with Fred. Okay. Fred and Ry had a very contentious relationship to put it mildly because Fred loaned him a copy of the Zapruder film and Ray wouldn’t give it back and you probably know about that. Yeah. That’s all related to the Farewell America story. Uh you bet. Yeah. Okay. So, look, tell how did you get involved with the with the Garrison investigation and what did you do um for for Jim Garrison? Well, yeah. The ironic part of it is I was a serving officer in the US Air Force. Therefore, I had a kind of a arms length relationship with the garrison investigation. But uh what happened was um Ed Jeffs who was a reporter for the Tacoma News Tribune and chair of our committee in the Seattle Tacoma area, he um called me one day when I happened to be home in Seattle because I would go there uh sometimes on weekends or on leave and um he said, “Hey, we’re southern cops.” which of course wasn’t technically true, but you know, he was trying to joke around a little about it because he had gotten these letters from Garrison’s office appointing him and me as representatives of Garrison’s office. This is in like September 68, you know, several months before the Shaw trial, right? And uh the office would send those letters out to literally God only knows who or how many. And I know I had one, Ed had one, Fred Nukem had one, which I’ve seen, and you know, I’m sure others. Do you still have yours? Oh, definitely. Okay. Love to see that. Oh, yeah. Well, you know, I take I have mixed emotions because on the one hand, I thought there was um some hope for the Garrison investigation and then Fred and I turned out to be disillusioned about that after the Shaw trial, but at the same time, I felt like I was doing something, right? The president had been shot down like a dog in the street, and there were what seemed to be good questions that had been raised about it. And the vast majority of Americans, you know, may have thought that there was a conspiracy, but they weren’t doing anything. They weren’t lifting a finger, right, to look into it themselves. And so, um, I didn’t have any direct communication with Garrison’s office. And that was I I think the way I wanted it, but I did go through uh Steve Burton occasionally. He was the uh citizens committee of inquiry chairman in Los Angeles, right? A young college student at the time. Basically, I went out on my own, you know, to kind of uh pursue a u a avenue of inquiry that nobody else was pursuing on Garrison’s investigation. And that was looking into G. Clinton Wheat. Clinton Wheat is a uh another fellow who was subpoenaed by Garrison, I think at the same time as Dr. Stanley Drenin, right, in Los Angeles. And that came about because Lauren Skip Hall had uh told Garrison about these two guys and and he knew them both well. and um you know he talked to Garrison about how they had been uh leaders in the right-wing movement in the LA area and um and wheat had had meetings in his home in Los Angeles where where uh people like uh Colonel um Gail of the California Rangers and Edward Eugene Bradley and uh Paul and you know other people right Garrison was u at least somewhat interested in uh you know they were uh people that would go to these meetings these so-called patriotic meetings at wheat’s house and so Garrison wanted to talk to wheat and Dannon Dannon went to court and got a judge to um turn down uh Garrison’s request for Drenin to go testify on the grounds that Grant Drenin said he had patience as a physician. He had patients that depended on him for uh treatment and he just couldn’t tear himself away from LA, right? And the judge went along with that. Wheat, on the other hand, just went on the lamb. He just picked up uh and it so happened that he had been living for several years just outside Clamoth Falls, Oregon, which is where I was stationed at the Air Force at the time. So I was uh you know we and and I had been in the same place. Um so that put me kind of Johnny on the spot to uh look into wheat. So Wheat was from Louisiana. He was a convicted murderer who had gotten a pardon. Um he was um a heavy equipment operator by occupation and had moved to LA, owned a very large house and um set himself up as you know kind of a leader of the far right there. In 1964, he chaired something called uh committee of 1 million Caucasians to march on Congress. Uh they didn’t actually have a million people show up at that time. And he was also a guy who the FBI had an eye on. And um he he moved to LA or from LA to to Oregon. Was Was he a Minute Man as well or? Well, I’d put him You know, it’s hard to separate the groups in LA. That’s right. The California Rangers, the Christian Defense League, the NSRP, right? They they over overlapped. Yeah. Uh I think in their membership and in their uh certainly in their goals. So whether he was ever officially a Minute Man, I doubt. But um he was part of that paramilitary. Right. Right. Yes. So I set off to try to find out what happened to him and I got in touch with reporters at the Reading Record Search Light newspaper down in California, right in California. And they were covering this because wheat had been traced to a cabin in a remote location in Shasta County, California. and they had actually interviewed his wife. Uh but he had disappeared a second time. Uh one day a car arrived. He piled in and people drove him away leaving his wife behind. And um so I was able to, for example, you know, listen to a taped interview with Mrs. Wheat. Uh one one reporter in particular um Wes Hughes was very uh active in uh investigating wheat and that that and also you know other associated characters. So, um, I kind of teamed up with Wes Hughes for a while, and I also got myself acquainted with Hal Hunt, who lived in Bernie, California, and he was the right-wing racist publisher of, uh, the National Chronicle, uh, which had a rather wide readership, I think, in the far right. and he was an old fellow who was sort of uh I guess hungry for some kind of company or someone to pay any attention to him. So I would occasionally drop by and talk with him at his office and um we got along pretty well although of course I was totally out of step with his uh political beliefs. But he thought that I was kind of a fellow traveler with his cause. So or else I wouldn’t be there. Uh so he would um he would tell me things and uh was you know quite um talkative uh and and so that was interesting. And then I talked to people in law enforcement. I really don’t know why some of these I talked to right-wingers in Los Angeles about wheat and his male. Uh, one lady in particular, her daughter, a teenager, had uh, apparently run off with a fellow named Joseph Raymond Kerry who was originally from Texas and been living in Southern California and and he was apparently a minute man. and uh Carrie and this lady’s daughter had disappeared and she had written to all kinds of the local hardight paramilitary types in these different groups I previously mentioned. So she gave me a list of the people that she’d written to to look at and it was, you know, kind of like a who’s who of the more notorious characters, right? White wing in the LA area whose names I ran across in print in various places or newspaper stories or so on, but I never found wheat despite my uh digging. Do we know what ever happened to him? Yes. He he died in 1979 in Shasta County, California. In other words, he eventually came back to Shasta County with his wife, right? In the 70s, I guess, and lived there until his death and then he was buried back home in North in Louisiana, right? Yeah. His his wife told the story that she had heard from somebody who said they were an army man and that she would go to Colorado Springs. She could see your husband again. And apparently he made some illusion to an army fort. Uh I forget the name of it off hand that was near Colorado Springs. She herself seemed to be kind of doubtful about where he had initially gone. Hal Hunt told me something interesting though because we were talking about wheat, you know, basically uh taking off for parts unknown after he was subpoenaed. And and Hunt told me that if Wheat went to New Orleans and talked to the DA, the whole right wing would be finished. And I think that’s kind of an exact quotation of what he said. I guess there was a fear that wheat had um such an inside knowledge of this far right wing of of characters. It would not be a good idea for him to sit in front of a grand jury. Yeah. I mean I think of I mean uh Edgar Eugene Bradley who was in the middle of that crowd. I mean, it appears that the only reason Garrison got interested in him was basically a feud between him and some of the other right-wingers. Oh, you bet. Yes. In August 1968, I went to Los Angeles and a meeting was set up between me and the two major witnesses against Bradley. Uh, and I guess I can name them because I doubt they’re alive, but Carol and Tom Thornhill, right? Yeah. Yeah. names that a lot of people I think will recognize if uh and they told me all kinds of things, you know, about how Bradley was this uh leader of a faction of the Minutemen that wanted Kennedy dead, not really a Dew faction, but a rival faction. And then um I went down again in early ‘ 68 after the Shaw trial. And one night at Fred Nukem’s I said, “Why don’t we phone Bradley and see if we can talk to him?” And Fred was a little dubious about that, but I got on the phone and I talked to Bradley and he said, “Come on over.” So Fred and I went to Bradley’s house and u he met us at the door and said, “Don’t you Garrison guys ever give up?”

Well, we assured him that we were not strictly speaking garrison guys at that point. And then he um he proceeded to tell us the ins and outs of that feud, right? And how there had been an attempt to firebomb his house, you know, and he had been more or less thrown out of his own church. Not that he was the preacher, but he was a I guess founder or leader of a uh church there in Los Angeles, right? And um you know, and and how he had been feuding with people like Adelot Thornhill and um Yeah, you’re right. Yeah. Well, there was even a lawsuit. They were they were suing each other as well. There was a big lawsuit going on. Oh, I know. I went and I’m thinking in 1971 I went to LA and yeah attended one of the court sessions in that lawsuit. Oh really? Wow. Yeah. Carol uh Inelot and Tom Thornley were out in the hallway. I guess if they looked at me they they perhaps didn’t recognize me from meeting me in ‘ 68. Dennis Mau was there with them. Okay. Yeah, of course he was the young fellow who had supposedly known about a uh rattling plot to kill Kennedy in LA in 1960. Am I right, I think. And that’s when he was like 14 years old or something. I was Yeah. 15, 14, right? Um but I didn’t actually I never met Mau, but I did see him because he was there. And then I sat in the courtroom with the with Bradley or near Bradley and yeah that was yeah eventually he won the suit and was awarded $1.

I he suffered all kinds of personal uh u difficulty and uh you know he was a u reserve deputy sheriff and when Hubert Humphrey visited LA in 1968 he was told you know we we don’t want you in on any security arrangements concerning Humphrey’s visit because if something happened to Humphrey you know and you were there uh it would be you know terrible. So it did that was one way it affected him but of course his reputation suffered. He talked about going in a store once and you know the proprietor you know when they found out who he was said and oh are you’re the guy that killed Kennedy. Yeah. He had to suffer through that. Now, in uh August 68, Fred Nukem and I went to Edgar Eugene Bradley’s house again and we had a sitdown interview with Jerry Patrick Heming and Lawrence Howard and that of course Patrick Heming um dominated the conversation to the point where I don’t remember anything that Howard had to say, but Right. P Jerry Patrick Heming of course is, you know, well known as having been a a teller of tall tales and a and a blabbermouth and and somebody you know that you just really had to ask yourself uh what what what has he said that is true or you know he he he he told us for example you know that he met Oswald in LA or rather a suburb of LA in 1959 right Oswald was a murdered um El Toro at the at the home of the uh Cuban council in LA. You know, he had very interesting stories, but that was kind of uh a unique I thought it was kind of a unique place where we would end up interviewing Howard and and Heming at Edgar Eugene Bradley’s house. Fascinating. I mean, my my favorite Heming story is this the year that he he he u he was on a panel at JFK Lancer, the conference in Dallas, and he was so rambling and incoherent that everybody started laughing and there’s a write up on the web of that of that session where they just can’t believe just like how, you know, this guy’s completely incoherent, you know, just making up these stories. It was it was quite a funny little writeup. between 68 and 71, I met Bradley on several different visits to LA, you know, and and he was a very personable guy. Uh seemingly, you know, very sincere and uh it was a, you know, I had a whole different take on him, of course, than the one I had when I first went to LA. And all I knew was Garrison has had this guy arrested, you know, and wow, I’m in the same city as Edgar Eugene Bradley. I didn’t even know him. But what I did know him, of course, are and and he he went on being uh in in associated with Fred Nukem. I think Fred testified I I’m not sure about this, but I think Fred testified at his uh tri at the trial, you know, when he sued Okay. Bible. He was going originally to sue other people. Yeah. As well. I think Mark Lane. I have I have a copy of of like the four-page uh suit against Mark Lane. Yeah. But I don’t I don’t know. I assume it didn’t really go anywhere. Yeah. I didn’t meet Mark Lane until 71, but Well, it’s it’s it’s just it’s f I mean fascinating. I mean, I really feel for Bradley. I mean I when I point out to people that you know Garrison I mean I mean he made a he charged Bradley with with conspiracy to to assassinate Kennedy and then like oops I made a mistake. I mean that’s it’s quite a mistake to make. Yeah. Yeah. Um Bradley told me once that he was visiting the Pacific Northwest and dropped in on Fred Chrisman uh after this was all over. It would have been, I think, between 68 and 70. And I guess they had a I would have loved to have been there for that. I guess they had a chat, you know, where they compare notes on what it’s like to be a garrison suspect. So, you know, this is all amazing material. What So, tell us a bit about Fred Chrisman and and and that part of your work uh for the for the Garrison investigation. Yeah. Well, I occasionally got asked to do something to look into Chrisman. Uh, we had kind of a division of labor in that up in the Seattle Tacoma area. Uh, Ed Jeffs who covered Chrisman as a reporter, you know, for the Tacoma News Tribune. Uh, so Eds and George Rener. Um, my two uh, comrades up there. I hope the word comrade doesn’t get misinterpreted. uh in in the committee they they hand did most of the investigating of Chrisman and um I did the wheat into things, you know, because by by mere chance I guess um you know we organized the committee of inquiry before either Weat or Chrisman had actually been subpoenaed. They were not yet subpoenaed as witnesses by Garrison. So, and then it just so happens that Chrisman crops up in Ed and George’s backyard, so to speak. And then a few months later, uh, or excuse me, earlier, um, Wheat, who lived just outside the town where I lived in Oregon, uh, got subpoenaed. So, we were both kind of, uh, lucky to be so close. some of his characters and so but occasionally I would get asked to do something or I would talk to people about Chrisman. Uh like I went to Veil, Oregon where he went to high school and I talked to a couple of people there who knew him. Uh another occasion I u was asked to look into some gypsy who uh was supposed to be tied up with uh with Chrisman, right? And this lived in Oregon. So I I kind of got the Oregon end of the Chrisman um u detective work. Yeah. And well, didn’t he have a house in Oregon or his wife his wife or his wife’s father had a house in Oregon? Well, his father, Fred Chrisman, Senior, right, uh lived in Portland and um had raceh horses. He had a, as I understand it, a concession at the racetrack there. And yes, he does seem to have had a ranch or farm. Now, that got made into a big deal. And that’s what brought Fred up the coast from LA in July 68 after uh Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy had been assassinated. Fred wanted to leave the country for a while. He just, you know, couldn’t put up with it. He wanted to go to Canada to Vancouver Island and just get away from America and Americans for a while, which he did. But on the way up, he stopped and visited me in Clamoth Falls, Oregon. Right. Yeah. Out of the blue, I got a knock on the door one day after after I came home from the base. And here’s Fred Nukem in a, you know, with a beard wearing sandals and I was there in my Air Force uniform. So, we kind of made a contrast. And but we really, you know, warmed up to each other very quickly and we went out to dinner together. I I took him out to the wheat place after wheat disappeared for parts unknown. The house he’d been living in, an old school house, burned to the ground. And I I would imagine he was the one that burned it, right? But um yeah, so I took I took the Nukems out there and showed him that. So um and then Fred kept going up the coast on the way to Vancouver Island and uh stopped to see George and Ed or you know and then on his way back I was in Seattle. So we all had another little reunion then. But yeah, Fred uh was sent up north uh as kind of a u side to his heading for Vancouver Island to look into Chrisman. And he did find a Chrisman farm in u the rural part of Oregon west of Portland. Well, I I have to laugh because Garrison Babe, pardon? No. Well, Garrison was the one who wrote a a memo to the HSCA saying, you know, look, isn’t it strange? Shaw went to Portland after San Francisco after the assassination. And guess what? You know, uh, Chrisman has a farm or his father has a farm out there. Isn’t that strange? Yeah. And one rumor had it that uh G. Clinton Wheat fled to that farm before he went back down to Chasta County, which I think is ridiculous, right? Yeah. And another version was that there were uh Sato masochistic parties or something that went on there. I mean there there were rumors uh going around about the Chrisman farm or the white farm uh you know that never of course had any uh any real basis but but yes his father does seem to have had a farm. And so Chrisman was involved in the sort of the Mory Island uh hoax. Yeah. 1947. Do you want to talk a bit about that or you had recently I know as a guest Adam Golitlightly? Yeah. And he mentioned my name I two or three times. I I’ve been trying to uh do some research that might be helpful to him. And uh yeah, Maui Island of course was this case where Fred Chrisman and another guy named Harold Doll, you know, supposedly reported um these doughnut shaped flying saucers going over Doll’s boat out in Puget Sound near Mauy Island and dropping debris on the boat that killed the dog and injured uh Doll’s son. And then a couple of early UFO spotters, Kenneth Arnold and Amil Smith, came to Tacoma. Arnold had been hired by Ray Palmer, you know, who was a publisher of Amazing Stories and Flying Saucer Magazine and Fate magazine later, right? Uh Palmer paid um Arnold to go there to look into Mari Island and Arnold recruited Smith to come with them. And then um and they had discussions with Chrisman and Dah. And then a couple of uh at their behest, a couple of Air Force uh UFO investigators from Hamilton Air Force Base in California flew up in a B25 and talked to Chrisman Adall and supposedly got a hold of some of these fragments and then the two the two officers Davidson and Brown in flying back their their B25 crashed and they were killed. So that’s kind of the whole thing in a nutshell. Of course, it was written off by the FBI and the Army Air Force as a hoax. It got a lot of newspaper publicity, particularly after the B25 crash. Yeah. Um, I think what separate, you know, I’ve asked myself, what makes Mari Island unique, if anything in that early period where there were UFO sightings and other hoaxes going on all over the country, but particularly in the West Coast. And I guess what stands out is number one, it had this dramatic element to it. This kind of sci-fi approach to what happened that none of the other UFO sightings had. They were all just visual sightings of shiny things uh or bright things in the sky. Here you had donutshaped flying saucers that were dropping debris on people, right? Uh, and you know, so it had this sci-fi element to it that nothing else had going. And and also, um, secondly, oh, by the way, Chrisman was a big fan of sci-fi. Um, I had somebody tell me that he should have been a science fiction writer. uh you know, somebody who knew him uh told me that, but he he perhaps Maui Island was his way of u you know, making some money if they could get their story published and number two, you know, allowing him to be kind of the sci-fi author in a way. The other thing though about Mari Island was the death of the two pilots or or officers, you know, that was just a terrible tragedy. Yes. And again, put a whole different cast on it. It made it a bigger more more uh I guess as uh as Ed Rupel the the project blue book chief later called it. You know he he said it was the second biggest hoax and the dirtiest hoax you know that they ever that ever happened in UFOs. So the deaths just added to the sensationalism and the publicity and all that kind of thing that it got. So it stood out. Yeah, it was tragic. I mean, it’s hard to then to admit, you know, it was a hoax after two people have been killed. I mean, it’s just a it was horrible, horrible thing. Yeah. I met the nephew of one of the pilots or the officers, Philip Lipson and Charlotte Lever, who I’ve known for years. Uh they wrote a book about Mahari Island and then they appeared and I came along at a UFO festival south of Seattle a number of years ago and uh two guests showed up. One was the nephew of one of the pilots and the other was a lady who was Hal Doll’s or Harold Doll’s daughter. But but his Yeah. the pilot the pilot’s uh nephew he he was just very broken up and this is like you know decades later but he just seemed to be very broken up and emotionally affected by uh kind of you know reminiscing about that whole event. Yeah. That was really tragic. Yeah. Yeah. Very tragic. And so then Crispen went on and he I mean he he met Thomas Beckham and they they were sort of two characters who got involved in a variety of little schemes. I mean at one point Chris Chrisman even did a UFO conference I think at one point. Oh yeah. He he went to one or two UFO conferences that I know of. Yes. Um yeah, he continued occasionally to try to get some mileage out of the fact that he had been, you know, at the there at the beginning, you might say. And uh he he, you know, he was touted or at least by him or or Harold Dah, you know, as being a kind of like a character out of the Invaders television show and that he was the most knowledgeable guy on UFOs around and so on. So what is the theory? What’s the theory that about Chrisman and the JFK assassination? Where how does how does he supposedly fit into the assassination? after Beckham was subpoenenaed I think in December uh the around the end of 1967 and he was subpoenaed because of his association in New Orleans in the early 60s you know where the anti-cast movement and was supposed to be kind of a knowledgeable guy when it came to people like uh Banister or Yeah or whatnot Jack Martin too. Yeah. So he got subpoenaed, but also there had been letters and contacts from people to Garrison’s office saying, “You ought to look into Beckham.” Beckham after got subpoenaed said, “Uh, gosh, the only time I was ever in Dallas was with my manager.” You know, I I was a country singer, still am, and my manager then was uh Fred Chrisman, and we did make a trip to Dallas, but that was 1966. So he publicly brought Chrisman’s name up uh almost a year before Chrisman got subpoenaed and um somebody in Garrison’s office made a you know had had had noticed an anonymous letter that mentioned Chrisman and Beckham that had been written in I think May 67. So in February 68, Bill Boxley, who was a investigator for Garrison, sat down with Bob Lavender in San Francisco and Lavender met Beckham in Omaha. And then not that long later after Beckham had a, you know, parted company with Chrisman in the Puet Sound area, Lavender shows up in uh in Olympia, Seattle, Tacoma, that area associated with Chrisman. And Lavender told Boxley, you know, all kinds of things uh about Chrisman. There were uh you know the anonymous letters particularly the one from Florida which I think was written in late ‘ 67 it uh you know spelled all kinds of allegations about Chrisman that he knew Klay Shaw that he knew Tippet which is really I think crazy uh that New Orleans dozens of times you know and so on and so forth. all these things kind of piled up and eventually led to uh and then Ed Jeffs who who you know would report on Chrisman in Tacoma um he was investigating and in touch with Garrison’s office and so eventually you know in November 68 uh uh Chris got called as a witness and he he went down to New Orleans and testified and didn’t have anything very valuable to say about anything. And uh you know there are several things about Chrisman though that I think deserve to be brought up. One is he had a very brave and distinguished record as a um Army Air Force pilot in World War II right in the China Burma India Theater. He did, I think, what looks to me like some good work on behalf of the gypsies in Tacoma that really got uh quite a bit of notice and drew attention to the plight of gypsy people, not just there, but across the country. It’s kind of an underrepresentative, ignored, left behind kind of a segment of the population. So, I think he did some good work on behalf of gypsies. I personally don’t consider that to have been a a con job on Chrisman’s part as much as it was, you know, a sincere attempt to help them. And then of course he had a many years as a teacher uh and school administrator you know so he really did some positive constructive things in his life but he would also turn around and get involved in in some dubious activities from time to time. Uh some of which maybe he didn’t even want to get involved in. So tell tell us a bit about um you know the fact Garrison included Chrisman in in the first draft of his book on the trail of the assassins. Yeah. Before that was published he he had Chrisman in there and then uh so he he had contact you know he had trouble getting it published and I think he had contacted you and and Fred Nukem for some help in adding some information about Chrisman. Yeah I had continued to to research Chrisman over the years. I got I met a fellow named Khani Hanohano in Seattle in 1971 at a UFO study group and he after I got out of the Air Force and Colani uh was a had a strong interest in Chrisman. So Colani and I collaborated for many years in researching Chrisman. Um, and uh, you know, in 1978, I was listening on radio to the broadcast on NPR, I think, of the, uh, House Select Committee hearings. Uh, and one day they bring up Chrisman, you know, and their photographic panel had looked at those photos of the tramps, right? You know, one of them could not be ruled out as Chrisman. They couldn’t say definitely it was, but they couldn’t. So I contacted the House Select Committee and ended up talking because they called me back. I think Cliff Fenton, the chief investigator for the House Select Committee. I told Fenton that when I taught high school in Oregon in the mid70s, I met a woman who had been a teacher with Chrisman at Reineer High School. And I, you know, I asked her, “Well, do you remember what went on and so on?” And and she told me about distinctly remembering Chrisman being in high in the high school the day of the assassination. And so I told Cliff Fenton about that. They ended up, as you know, I’m sure, getting u uh you know, affidavits, the teachers that had taught with him and could vouch for that. And of course, even in his book, Murder of a City, that came out in 1970, he said that’s what he was doing. But that hadn’t gotten much attention or that would that been pretty much overlooked. That book wasn’t a bestseller. It wasn’t widely read. Um, so anyway, the House Committee’s report ended up saying, you know, we we were able to exclude Chrisman despite what the photographic panel said. He, you know, he he’s clearly not one of the tramps, right? So, in n in the late 80s, Jim Garrison was working on his book on the trail of the assassins, and he contacted Fred Nukem and asked him if he could help him out in any way with the Chrisman end of his research, which at that time, as you said, was going to be a big part of the book. Yeah. And by that time, you know, he thought Chrisman was a CIA agent. And uh well, Fred turned to me because he knew I had been doing research on Chrisman far beyond, you know, what we did back in the 60s. So I wrote to Garrison and I later had a phone call with him, uh, you know, where I said basically, it’ll do your book more harm than good to put Chrisman in it. Well, on the phone call, Garrison explained to me some of the reasons, you know, we had for wanting to uh finger Chrisman, like the fact that Chrisman taught in a town in Oregon that wasn’t too far from Dallas, Oregon, where Larry Craford was from originally. And it was kind of like, yeah, but not even at the same time. um you know so he gave me some very weak reasons. But one thing that you had a a uh installment of your blog cover was was something that I independently arrived at myself and that was that Garrison thought Chrisman because he’d worked at Boeing represented this conglomeration of aerospace companies that was behind the assassination. Right. Yes. Yeah. in the late ‘ 68 that that was a big revelation for Garrison that aerospace companies like General Dynamics or Lockheed or North American or Boeing in particular uh you know that some group of those companies uh I don’t need I don’t mean to indict all of them that was his bag but uh you know he really thought that was who was behind the assassination and Chrisman was obviously uh still working for Boeing. Yeah. In fact, he worked there from 60 to 62 in the personnel department. I I talked to a woman who had worked in the personnel department back when Chrisman was there and she told me that he had a pretty mundane job and um you know, it definitely didn’t involve u any cloak and dagger kind of stuff that Garrison described to it. Well, I spoke I spoke to uh the publisher I think apprentice hall, one of the companies that turned down Garrison’s book and I spoke to him and he basically said one of the problems was that Garrison had promised all this information about Chrisman and the CIA and nothing materialized and that was one of his chief reasons for turning down the book. Yeah. I found on the internet and and you may have done so as well the actual letter from the editor or publisher. Yeah. Explaining that to Garrison. Yeah. That that what you just have the material you have on Chrisman is just too weak. So it turned out back when I talked to Garrison, of course, I had no idea that that was happening. So, it turns out my call to Garrison wasn’t the only or even an important reason why he dropped Christmas in the book, but maybe it had a little bit to do with it. I don’t know. Well, I’m sure it had a lot to do with it, but uh perhap what I don’t know is is did uh didclar, who is the editor of his book, did he also help uh or take, you know, tell Garrison to take out Chrisman? Okay. I I don’t know the answer to that. I mean, the the scar papers are locked up in the AARC, and I’m just dying to get to look at those papers, which might tell us more about um the editing of Garrison’s book. You bet. Well, there’s so much we know and even so much more that we don’t know and would like to, you know, and it’s a shame that we don’t have access. But, of course, it would take a hundred people a lifetime of work to to go through a lot of what’s out there that that we unfortunately uh don’t have the time to look at or or have access to. Yeah, I’m I’m hoping that the ARC does digitize a lot of their stuff because they have an awful lot of interesting material um that’s just sort of sitting there in like they have like five different warehouses um in the DC area. So, I’m I’m wish they would digitize it. Well, right. or as another example of what’s sitting around somewhere, I hope, you know, is the uh 40 filing cabinets and stuff that David Lifton accumulated because I don’t think everything in it would be garbage, you know. No, I’m sure he had a lot of Garrison material and he had all sorts of stuff, letters from other other researchers and Oh, yeah. and the results of interviews that he did. Yeah. Some of which he never mentioned in print. Yeah. I know. Oh, I mean that that stuff is somewhere and I’m I wish somebody would digitize it. I I can tell you that somebody is now digitizing Gayan Fon’s records. Mhm. Which is I have like a banker’s blocks full of correspondence with Lifton. Okay. He was, you know, I only met him once in my life, but uh 25 years ago or so, you know, we kind I I became in close contact with him again. And for years, you know, he would share and I was, you know, not always convinced by what he was sharing, but uh I I enjoyed knowing him. I enjoyed knowing Lift. Yeah. I I had one phone call with David Lifton and and uh I had called him in Las Vegas. I wanted to talk about the the the question whether uh General Lameé was at the autopsy. And it was a very very it was a fun conversation with with David in his apartment. There was only one small space where he got good cell reception. And so if he moved slightly, he would lose connection. At one point we did lose connection. And he immediately sent me an email. Call me right back. And I called him back and we spent over an hour on the phone. He was reminiscing about, you know, the different different uh publishing companies that took on best evidence. And it was a bit of a reminiscing time for him. I think, you know, he appeared to me a bit lonely or wanted somebody to talk to. Yeah. I had a lot of long conversations with him or conversations that would come at late pretty late at night for me and uh it was always enjoyable to talk to him. Uh and he yeah he would reminisce quite a lot. So, just uh you know, we don’t have that much time left, but can you tell us a bit about your um your work in the military uh on investigating UFOs? Sure. Yeah. I was stationed at Kingsley Field, an Air Force base in uh Clamoth Falls, Oregon for three years. And um it wasn’t long after I got there that they decided that I ought to be as a you know brand new second lieutenant with not enough work I guess to do. Uh that in addition to my job as base disaster preparedness officer that was my main duty there for three years. They would make me the uh UFO project officer for the base. And that meant that u I would investigate in the field UFO reports that arrived from people generally in the southern Oregon northern California area because we were very close to the California border. We were kind of what I thought of as the greater Mount Shasta area in the manner of speaking. So, and a few months went by before I got my first uh report to look into, but over a period of time from 68 on, and of course, this was for project blue book. So, I would send reports to them and also to the Condan Committee at the University of Colorado, which was investigating UFOs under an Air Force contract. And some cases I investigated I didn’t report because they just didn’t seem to have anything to go by. You know, like somebody saw a little light in the sky going over at night, which could be anything, right? So, I would talk to them and then I would, you know, and take the written report. they’d fill out a form and you know then I would decide not to send it into project blue book because they wanted something that was more sub you know sub had some substance right so um every few months on average I would get a report uh and I think maybe twice I sent in a report in writing you know or by fax to um to project blue book and the conan committee And then after the con or after the project blue book was shut down in December 69, a few months went by. And in April 70, I got another report. At that point, I decided, well, I may not be working for Project Bulbick anymore, but I’ll go investigate it anyway. It was a report by a couple of Air Force sergeants of what they thought was a landing of a UFO on a mountain in Northern California. That turned out to be very interesting. Um, they were good witnesses. They they showed me a picture that they made of the UFO that looked very interesting, right? It it looked a lot like a picture I’d seen of a UFO in France. And um I had a geer counter with me and a Polaroid camera. And when I took a photograph of what they said was where the UFO landed, you know, with a Polaroid camera, you’d pull the thing out and then you could watch it develop, as you may remember. Yep. Yeah. So, I’m looking at this photograph, visualize in front of my eyes, and what I’m looking at is the sergeant off in the distance, trees and logs, and then what looked like flames of fire coming out of the ground. I thought, you know, now that may have been an anomaly of the film. I I totally recognize that in retrospect, but you can imagine my reaction and looking at this photo and seeing what I couldn’t see with the naked eye that looked like fire coming up, right, from the ground. But so that turned out to be very interesting. But I had nobody to report it to. Project Blue didn’t exist anymore. So um I just put it in my file, which I still have. I still have my file of all my reports and notes and photos and things like that because otherwise I would have just it would have gotten thrown away, right? Project blue ended. So, what what do you make of the current activity with UAPs that’s going on right now? I you know, I don’t know really what to make of it. It’s kind of bewildering. Um, I never been much of a believer in u in the actual existence of of some kind of alien hardware flying around in our skies. So, uh, even though I have a interest in flying saucers that goes back to my real really back to my childhood, I was a regular reader of Fate magazine as a teenager and I bought books about UFOs back when I was maybe 10 or 12. And as I Yeah. So I had this long history of interest in UFOs. But when I actually started investigating them, I found that the witnesses were very reputable, credible people. But my the difficulty is how do I as the investigator establish what it was they saw or even really for sure what it looked like or how it behaved, right? So they would draw me diagrams and give me a description, but then you know it was a case of do I really think this is truly unidentified? Um I’ve got some statistics here. the two years uh 1968 and 1969.

Um 68 there was only project rule book only uh categorized three sightings that whole year as unidentified and then in ‘ 69 only one. So, I came in at a point where Project Blue Book was treating very very few UFO sightings as being truly unidentified. Um,

for what? Well, I’m I’m just amazed that like Luna has her hearings uh in Washington and then she she actually was on Joe Rogan show claiming that our advanced technology today is because of of aliens. I mean, it’s just it’s I I couldn’t believe she actually said that. And uh Well, I can believe she said it, but I can’t believe it’s true.

That’s true. Yeah, you’re right. Yeah. Well, yeah, go ahead. Oh, well, yeah, go on to another topic if you have time. Yeah. I mean, I think what I’d like to do is just sort of um there’s so much more to talk about. I mean, I’d just like to get your thoughts on the current state of JFK assassination research, what you think about the assassination today, and how that’s changed over the years. I It’s a just a generally broad topic. Well, I think I’ve grown more skeptical over the years, you know, about many of the claims that are made, the conspiracy theories and so on. I’ve decided now that I’ve got to a certain point in life that I would like to be neutral on the subject of the JFK assassination. I know that’s a way of probably alienating everybody else who has any interest in this subject, but I’d kind of like to take the stance that I’m neither pro- conspiracy theory nor totally anti-conspiracy theory because I think there is some uh possibility, you know, kind of thinking from an epistemological viewpoint that we don’t know quite enough to be able to say flatly that there was no conspiracy of any kind. Um Oswald might have conspired with the groundkeeper at Daily Plaza, you know, so that that guy would make his lawnmower backfire and be a distraction as Oswald fired the shots. I’m not saying that happened. Please don’t get that. I’m saying that would be But that kind of conspiracy, of course, would thrill no one. No one would knock themselves out for decades trying to prove that kind of conspiracy. It it just wouldn’t rise to the level of what would make people who believe in a conspiracy happy, right? Yeah. But on the at the same time, some kind of low-level conspiracy that doesn’t have to include everyone and their brother uh or every, you know, every letter agency of the government. uh you know you can’t rule totally 100% with 100 you know moral conviction rule that out and I don’t imagine um the uh you know what I’m saying is going to make some people happy but uh on the other hand the conspiracy theories that have come along you know the the the thing is to look at them each in turn and see what’s wrong with them and there’s always something wrong uh or there’s always something lacking or something more that I’d like to see before I would buy into them. So individual conspiracy theories I have yet to be convinced. Um, but you know, I think debunkers, if you want to use that term, it’s really kind of a unpleasant term in a way, you know, like UFO debunkers. But, um, you know, the the people that that the conspiracy theorists would would despise as being debunkers are really doing the conspiracy theories a service as cons, you know, being critics of what they do. Uh it’s setting up guard rails. It’s saying, “Look, if you want to have a decent conspiracy theory, don’t do this or don’t bring up that, right?” But, you know, uh uh yeah, kind of narrow your thinking and try to weed out the garbage and the untruths and the mistakes that you’re making and then see what you have left and maybe build on that. Um yeah, I totally agree. I totally agree with that. I’m surprised that more conspiracy believers don’t do some of that work. Um, policing themselves. It’s it’s very important. The other thing I would say about a possible conspiracy is I think the one thing that I don’t know about is was somebody egging Oswald on that we don’t know about in Jim Host thought so. You know, Jim Hosty, who I got to know back in 1983 when he came and talked to my uh JFK assassination class in Kansas. He came on two different occasions and and spoke at link both times. I also met him once at his home and we talked on the phone and corresponded for years after that. Um, you know, he talked about the Castro regime murder mount. That’s the way he put it. that he thought that perhaps not with intent as far as Oswald was concerned, not that they were particularly addressing him, but you know, he was just influenced by and egged on in a way by the rhetoric that was coming out of Havana. Now I think eventually Hosty went a little bit further than that because in his book Assignment Oswald, you know, he says in in a he makes an assertion that I think has gotten very little if any attention. He asserts in Simon Oswald that Oswald was photographed in Mexico City on a street with Kikakov.

I think by the time he wrote ASSIGNMENT OSWALD which was like around 10 years after I met him,
he brought that up which he had never mentioned to me but you know so I think Hostie over time became a conspiracy theorist but thought that it was the Cuban and or the Russian uh governments that were behind it. Right? more than just Oswald picking up something from the news that Castro may have said. Yeah. Castro did it theory was also bought into by other people like um you know two men that in ‘ 63 were very much involved in Cuban affairs in the department of the army were Alexander Haig and Joseph Calfano. and they both expressed over the years their conviction that Castro was behind the assassination. And uh I don’t know that we can totally rule that out. Also Gus Russo’s theory about uh Oh yes, Gus Russo. You bet. Yes. Yeah. And we I guess we normally think of him as being anti-conspiracy, but on the other hand, he he certainly uh did some intriguing research on the on the Castro angle. Yeah, very much so.
Okay, look, I think there’s a lot more we can talk about in this. We’ll we’ll probably have to do another interview at another time, but thank you very much for session.
It was a lot of fun.
Thank you very much

Delusion Episode 23, Adam Gorightly

www.mattkprovideo.com/2025/09/09/delusion-episode-23-adam-gorightly/

Fred Litwin’s website: www.onthetrailofdelusion.com

Adam Gorightly’s website: http://www.historiadiscordia.com

TRANSCRIPT:


Welcome to another edition of On the Trail of Delusion, where we try to separate the wheat from the chaff and try to give you something interesting on the JFK assassination as opposed to some of the ridiculous slop you’ll see on the internet and on YouTube.

So today my special guest is Adam Gorightley who is an author who has written many many books
but also has a terrific website http://www.historiadiscordia.com which you’ll see a link to in the bottom and his articles have appeared in all sorts of publications on the internet underground magazines countercultural publications.
But what’s of real interest to us here on this podcast is that Adam has done some absolutely fundamental amazing work on people like Kerrie Thornley, Fred Chrisman, Thomas Beckham, and Raymond Brochures.
These are all names that sort of came out of or were associated with the Garrison investigation. And so I’m very happy to have Adam with me today.
And Adam, tell us how you got into, looking at some of these characters.

Yeah, thanks for having me on, Fred. Well, let’s start with Kerrie Thornley. Back in the early 90s or so I became aware of him probably even earlier than that.
I was during that period uh like I start had started writing for Z and I was really interested in conspiracy theories and UFOs and paranormal and all this kind of far out stuff. Thornley came into my awareness.
First of all, I saw some articles he had written for a Zine called FACT SHEET FIVE, which was really an important Zine during that period.
FACT SHEET FIVE was basically a catalog this guy named Mark Zunder put out listing all the Zines available.
2:42
He did this month after month, put a lot of work into it.
And there was I saw a column called Conspiracy Corner by this Kerrie Thornley guy and it’s like I actually couldn’t make a lot of sense out of it but uh I became more aware of
3:01
him and as uh time went on uh I came across a book called Conspiracies Coverups and Crimes by an author named Jonathan Vankin you might be familiar with.
3:13
Yeah. and uh he was covering some of the more far out conspiracy theories in that
3:20
book becoming prevalent at the time and some of the characters one of whom was Kerrie Thornley
3:27
and just a thumbnail sketch Thornley had known Oswald and the Marines for a
3:34
short period of time then got sent over to Japan where uh Oswald had been
3:40
previously stationed at Atsugi and he was working on a book at during that
3:45
period called the IDLE WARRIORS which was like being a Marine during peace time, the cold war and kind of the
3:53
malaise and things going on with that period. And he based them uh the main
4:00
character in the book was Johnny Shelburn which Thornley based on
4:06
himself and other Marines he had known in that period including Lee Harvey Oswald. And so Thornley got over to uh
4:13
Japan and that’s when he around the time that Oswald defected and he went
“whoa I’m going to change the focus of this book to be entirely on Oswald “you know.
So that was kind of the first curiosity that he had known Oswald in that period and was writing a book about
4:32
Oswald uh prior to the Kennedy assassination. And so Venin covered that in his article
4:40
about Thornley. And he also got into some of the more far out theories
4:46
surrounding Thornley who was investigated and uh indicted by I’m not
4:52
sure if he was ever indicted.
Fred Litwin:
Yeah. No, he was.
Okay. Yeah. Yeah. By Jim Garrison. And Garrison had these
5:01
smattering of theories. one that Thornley was the second Oswald that he
5:06
was connected to the military and the aerospace industry and they were somehow
5:11
involved and he also claimed that Thornley was CIA and uh on and on and on
5:18
and so Thornley denied all those accusations initially but then later like in the ‘7s
5:25
after the Garrison investigations he started thinking about that and he was also some would say suffering from uh
5:33
paranoid schizophrenia, which might have been uh helped along by, you know, the
5:40
prosecution of Jim Garrison causing that paranoia. But he started he
5:45
was looking back and he now by this time he was thinking, well, maybe Garrison got some things right. There was a lot
5:51
of odd stuff going on during that period. And how did I happen to run a,
5:57
you know, my paths and Oswald come together? Was there some other sinister force there? You know, was the
6:04
conspiracy setting him up as an alternative pepsi? So he started
6:09
believing all these things or entertaining these uh notions and uh
6:15
ultimately at one point he started to believe he was a part of the MK Ultra
6:21
project and that he he and Oswald were part of a Nazi breeding experiment to
6:27
create, you know, these future assassins of America. his life kind of spiraled
6:32
out of control during that period. But and so that was kind of a nutshell of uh
6:37
Thornley in that book uh Venin put out. It was just one chapter and I I was
6:43
fascinated by the guy started collecting materials and
6:48
uh Ven said it one point he was uh considering um writing a biography of
6:56
Thornley. I go, “Oh man, I’ll love it when that came out.” But he never got around to that and I had this material
7:03
and eventually I had enough content I felt to pursue writing a book on
7:09
Thornley and that turned out to be the prankster and the conspiracy which was published in u 2003. So I guess you’re
7:18
asking how I became interested in these characters. that was one of the characters and how they became
7:23
and and and you also published uh this book Caught in the Crossfire um which I have to say is an absolutely fantastic
7:30
book and anybody anybody interested in Carrie Thornly this is the book to get.
7:36
It’s chalk full of primary sources, documents, photographs, stories. I mean
7:42
it’s it’s absolute essential reading and you’ll find links to it in in the comments below.
7:47
Came into contact. How did this happen? It was kind of odd how I came into contact. We were never quite clear how
7:53
our paths crossed, but I met up with a guy named Bob Newport. And uh this was
7:59
after I wrote the Thornly book. I think I might have Yeah, I interviewed him for the Thornly book actually. He was
8:05
friends with Thornley uh growing up and he uh mentioned he had some Discordian
8:12
archives and I didn’t even mention that uh Thornley and a buddy of his named
8:17
Greg Hill started this spoof religion back in the late 1950s called
8:23
Discordianism which is the worship of the Greek goddess and of chaos and discord. It was kind of started as a
8:30
spoofed religion but became a kind of collective for different artists where they shared ideas and it was kind of a
8:38
platform to u kind of riff on uh
8:45
different religions and philosophy and politics. And it was a circle of different writers and artists that
8:53
exchanged uh sometimes humorous stuff, collages. They had these things called
8:59
groovy packs where they’d send a bunch of things in a uh envelope with a joint
9:04
usually and you take the joint out and take a hit and put put your own spin on
9:09
this uh collection of materials sent to you and send it on to the next guy. And
9:14
a lot of this material became like these projects ended up in a book called the
9:19
Principia Discordia which you could say was uh kind of the Bible of Discordianism. So
9:26
anyway, where I was going with all this and here’s a here’s a book that that you know another very important book uh uh
9:34
the sort of the origins of uh the Discordian Society which you were you were part of writing this book
9:40
right and that’s where I was going. um Newport told me at one point uh he had
9:48
some uh what he called the Discordian archives and I actually met him at at
9:54
Robert Anton Wilson’s house in like 2001 and he brought an armload of this material and I thought, “Oh, this is
10:00
some great uh stuff.” You know, I’d like to maybe use it for a book at uh some
10:06
point. He said, “Well, you’re welcome to do that. I’ll let you I’ll let you take some of this along. There’s more I
10:12
have.” But so I borrowed that and scanned it and started working on this book. And later on, we’re like in 2009
10:19
or so, he said, I was in LA where he lived and he said, “Well, come on over and you can have everything.” And it
10:24
turned out to be oh, a dozen of boxes, which was all the material that Greg Hill had put together
10:32
for these uh archives over the years. And a lot of them were I mean, he just saved everything. He’s all his
10:40
correspondents and he’s saved, you know, the carbons of what he sent out to
10:45
people and there was just a wealth of material and some of that stuff in there was uh files on the garrison
10:53
investigations and a lot of uh communications Thornley was having with different people during that period. saw
11:01
that the material that kind of fell in my lap uh has been used for these
11:07
different projects. Is that is that material in in some sort of physical archive somewhere?
11:13
I’m actually uh working on that right now. The archive is at my house here.
11:19
Okay. And u it should be going into a uh library archive. Uh it’s probably going
11:27
to happen at the end of this uh year or early uh next year. Uh more news
11:34
to follow on that. But uh yeah, I’ve been working it placing it at a library
11:40
for quite some time and uh university library.
11:46
That’s good. I um I’m struck with with Thornley in the fact that you know Garrison went so far as to think that he
11:53
was the body in the in the Oswald photograph in the backyard you know and
11:59
I mean it’s just and and and what’s amazing is you know bro people like brochers were sort of into selling that
12:07
as well you know you know oh I know I recognize those hips you know I mean it’s it’s so ridiculous
12:14
I guess we Oswald is the one who started that rumor cuz I think he’s
12:20
Was it he or someone and said that Well, that’s not me. My head’s been super imposed on uh that uh photo of me. Where
12:29
was it? In Fort Worth or wherever he Yeah, it was in his backyard in down in Dallas on Ne holding the communist
12:37
literature in one hand and I guess the rifle. I’ve been there. I’ve been to that house. Oh, backyard.
12:43
And so anyway, that kind of rumor got started and uh Garrison heard about it
12:50
and uh he just pick up on these things. Um Thornley’s dad was a photo engraver
12:57
of some sort. So he thought that his father or Thornley would have had
13:03
the skills to do that and that. But then brochures testified. I guess it was
13:10
brochures who really said, “Yeah, that was uh Thorn Lee in the backyard posing
13:16
as Oswald.” And that started a lot of the second Oswald stuff. And there was
13:22
witnesses uh Garrison said he had several witnesss who saw Thornley with
13:28
Marina Oswald, but that never really panned out when I was looking at there was one witness who came forward, but
13:35
you know, it all seemed sketchy. was Yeah. And and I mean he he he told I
13:41
mean he even wrote a memo to the HSCA about the backyard photograph and you know how lucky we might be because the
13:48
father was a photo engraver. And then you know he he was just so insistent. Garrison so believed that Thornley was
13:55
in New Orleans um when Oswald was there and they must
14:00
have crossed paths because Barbara Reed you know said that you know they had been together.
14:06
another character write about. Yeah. And there was some overlap as I
14:11
recall because there was a few weeks. Yeah. Uh them being at the same who knows.
14:18
Well, yeah. You would have thought uh Thornley would have recognized Oswald
14:24
quite obviously, but and if he had seen Oswald, he would have been really interested in talking to him
14:29
and really uh there’s no reason to hide that. I mean, he would have been really interested.
14:34
Barbara Reed claims she saw them together in a coffee house or a
14:40
restaurant. And uh then if you look through some of that materials, there
14:45
supposedly was a second witness and there was an affidavit uh produced by this fellow. I forget his
14:52
name, but it was never signed. So it seemed like one of those things where Reed or Garrison put it together and
14:59
say, “Here, sign this so we can have another witness.” and whoever it was didn’t sign it. That kind of tells you
15:05
something. Um, yeah, Reed was a character herself. We talked about the Discordian society,
15:12
this kind of prank religion of these uh it was a real mix of like libertarians, bohemians, uh,
15:21
pranksters. And really when it started in the Southern California, it was just
15:28
three guys. uh Hill Thornley and Bob Newport. But when they went to New
15:34
Orleans, they uh kind of started in New Orleans branch of the Discordian Society
15:40
there with a another character called Roger Leven who kind of got sucked into
15:46
the Garrison Investigation at one point. And Barbara Reed was involved and Reed claimed that she was the goddess Iris
15:53
herself. She was involved in all kinds of stuff. I mean, she was uh pretty
15:59
fundamental to the uh resurrection of the old style jazz scene being uh
16:07
reinvigorated there in New Orleans. That’s something certainly positive you can say about her. And uh
16:13
but she was also one some people described her as she was somebody who
16:19
always put herself in the middle of these different situations whether she
16:25
whether she actually had any uh connection to them and you know there’s rumors that her and Garrison had some
16:33
type of relationship and and she was basically
16:38
kind of like Jack Martin uh initially a witness but Then they become part of the
16:44
investigation team. So you can see how this whole thing was so conflicted, you
16:50
know. Yeah. And Weisberg would spend a lot of time at Barbara Reed’s house and and trying to sort of get information from
16:58
her or bounce ideas off of her and they’d all meet at her house, all these people together and and it was like a
17:05
cauldron of rumors. I mean I mean New Orleans, everybody was talking in New Orleans.
17:11
I think Thornley made the mistake. At some point he met uh Reed uh he’d
17:18
returned to New Orleans for a little bit of time like in ‘ 64 after the assassination and the topic came up and
17:27
I think she confronted him at that time saying well yeah I saw you uh with
17:33
Oswald don’t you remember that? He’s going, “Well, no, you know, I think I guess it
17:40
could have been possible and I didn’t recognize him.” And that kind this opened up the
17:46
the whole thing to spin out of control.
17:52
Yeah. And I, you know, I feel I feel for for Thornley. I mean, he was dragged to New Orleans and indicted and he didn’t
17:58
have a lawyer and and uh you know, these gar, you know, the garrison’s men are trying to convince him of whole variety
18:05
of things and cross-examining him and and uh you know, I mean, my god, he was
18:10
put through the ringer and then you had the ridiculous Harold Weisberg actually asking I think Fred Nukem to can you
18:18
draw some some whiskers on a picture of Thornley to make him look like Oswald.
18:23
Yeah, I was looking at some of that uh material today and somehow
18:29
Thornley did have a lawyer at one point named Lavine and somehow they came
18:34
across this correspondence with the DA’s office with uh Fred Nukem and they sent
18:41
Weisberg was involved. They sent a photo of Thornley out of the Tampa Times and
18:46
they asked uh N uh Nukem if he could retouch it. a lot of basically the
18:52
hairline to uh make him look more like Oswald. I guess they’re pursuing this uh
18:59
theory. So once again, uh who I don’t know exactly what they did with that
19:04
photo, but it wouldn’t be surprised me if his investigators had the touched up photo and taken around. Do you recognize
19:13
this uh fellow, you know, and and then Weisberg wrote the letter on DA stationery and then
19:19
Yeah. Yeah. To make it look all official. And it was just a bizarre bizarre incident.
19:26
And then I mean and then David Lifton got involved because he became friends with Carrie Thornley and realized this
19:33
is all silly. Yeah. And so he started writing about that out in Los Angeles. It was just um an
19:40
interesting Sylvia Maher was a friend of Carrie Thornley’s. Mhm. Yeah. She wrote a letter uh kind of
19:47
defending him. Uh and uh yeah, they exchanged several letters and
19:52
and he sent her a lot of Discordia stuff and and they exchanged letters and and I
19:58
think she contributed to his defense fund and you know she she early on realized this is all so ridiculous.
20:06
But he was Thornly was uh poking the bear we might say when it came to uh
20:11
Garrison. Uh he was he wrote a few different things saying how Garrison was
20:18
an out of control authoritarian and things like this and they even became
20:25
part of a Discordian prank called called Operation Mindfuck
20:30
right where uh and it had to do part of that came out of um there was that dude
20:37
Howland Chapman who I guess was supposedly an investigator. He’s a Gilly
20:42
Plaza regular as they called him. And uh he was a John Burch Society guy who
20:49
believed that the Illuminati was involved in the assassination which was a pretty common kind of John Burchian
20:57
thing at that time that was being spread. But he was the one who came up with, as I understand it, he got a hold
21:04
of those uh three [ _ ] photos and got those to uh Garrison. 21:09 Anyway, Thornley heard about Chapman and Chapman was the one who really convinced Garrison that there was a shot from the 21:15 sewer, right? That Yeah, that too. You know, so you have this you have this 21:20 thing Chapman goes to see Garrison, convince him there’s a shot in the from the sewer and like one day later Garrison is issuing press releases, you 21:27 know, there’s a shot from the sewer. I mean, it’s we’ve we’ve solved it. There was whatever 21:33 two men, three men men, six men, men on the triple overpass. It was 21:39 constantly changing, you know, but he denounced it like we’ve solved it. It’s over. 21:44 Yeah. It’s a done deal. Um I was going to say this. So this Illuminate Illuminati 21:51 thing tickled Thornley and Robert Anton Wilson, these other guys and they got interested in uh 21:58 researching the Illuminati and they tied it into the Discordian society and some of the prank letters they sent I mean 22:05 they’d send stuff to like Welch with the John Burch Society and other people but 22:10 apparently they sent some to Garrison claiming yeah that the Illuminati was behind the assassination. 22:17 And I found one in Weisberg’s files. It was Robert Anne Ton Wilson wrote a spoof 22:24 letter along those lines to uh Weisberg. And Weisberg was one of the ser of this 22:30 bunch too, you know. 22:36 Well, yeah, in in a certain sense, but yeah. 22:42 So, so yeah, Thornley, you know, a fascinating character. Um uh but that 22:47 you know led you to write about you know people like uh Beckham Chrisman and Brochers. I don’t know if you want to 22:53 talk about one of those characters. Um, yeah, with brochures. Um, 23:01 I’ve been a reading Kennedy assassination books for a long time like you as a young man and u 23:10 you know I came came across uh oh different pro garrison stuff back in 23:18 the mid 80s or so you know and I go wow that’s a lot of his theories and the 23:26 people he claimed were perpetrators involved in the conspiracy. They show up 23:31 in other books. People were repeating this. So, it was and of course Oliver Stone ended up running with it. But, you 23:38 know, you see that stuff as a young guy and it’s like, wow, this is the district attorney of New Orleans. He’s got a lot 23:45 of power and you hear him talk, you know, charismatic guy and all that. It’s like, yeah, he start repeating this 23:52 stuff as fact. it, you know, later on you dig into it, it’s like, huh, maybe 23:58 not so much. Yeah. Um, so, uh, but I remember seeing brochers 24:04 mentioning a book, uh, by Bernard Festerald. Yeah. Coincidence or Conspiracy, I think it 24:11 was called. Yeah, it was a paperback book. Yeah. Which I have. Yeah. Bernard Festerwald. Yeah. And it’s like a who’s who and good 24:17 resource at the time. Um, and brochures was in there. And once again, it’s one of those characters. It’s like what? 24:23 This guy, they said he knew Ferry knew that Ferry was part of the assassination team, but 24:31 then brochures had also threatened the LBJ at one point. He was also involved 24:38 in UFOs. It’s like what is that this guy, you know? Then um 24:44 as I was writing the first Thornley book um 24:49 started coming across you know in the National Archive files of Garrison brochure statements and yeah he’s making 24:57 all these claims that uh Thornley was part of this group of 25:02 assassins that were also homosexuals and uh that somehow that was part of the 25:10 motive and he connected seemingly connected did Clay Shaw and Ferry and 25:15 Thornley to the assassination. And yeah, he had these crazier ideas like the 25:21 superimposed uh photo and I in uh in the Discordian archives I came across uh 25:29 other materials in the correspondence and I think you mentioned this in your book where a friend of uh Thorn Lee’s 25:37 named Luis Lacy had some interactions with brochures in the around 1970 you 25:42 know so I kind of incorporated that into the book and showed what a kind of she 25:49 she thought he was nuts. Um, it had to do with uh I don’t know if I need to go 25:55 into the all all the details, but uh but he he was another one of these characters kind of like Barbara Reed 26:02 involved in a lot of different stuff. Some of it seemed uh pretty positive, 26:07 you know, like he was helping homeless people in his mission there in San 26:12 Francisco. And he was he had a hand in uh what do he what was it the first uh 26:19 gay liberation day in San Francisco, but then he was somebody who’d always have a 26:24 falling out with people and got into a big row with lesbians in San Francisco. 26:30 So they kind of kicked him out in following years of being involved in the 26:36 gay liberation. So he kind of started his own. He he had this group called the Lavender 26:42 Panther which were like gay vigilantes that were take going to take on uh 26:49 people who were beating up gays and he was just always showing up in uh papers. 26:55 But he’s also kind of a unhinged guy who’s always getting into confrontations 27:00 with uh people and had mental issues. And here we go. This is one of your uh 27:06 you were you were a priest caller. He was sort of a supposed reverend, a man of the cloth, but uh but who knows how 27:14 real that is. And well, he got some credentials through the Universal Life Church, right? Yes. 27:19 Which anybody could get get at that time. And so you and so did uh the likes 27:25 of Fred Chrisman, uh Carrie Thornley. I mean, a lot of people were becoming universal life ministers for a lot of 27:32 different reasons. Tom Beckham as well. Uh part of it was to run scams. 27:39 You know, I think some people during the Vietnam War era thought they could avoid 27:44 the draft be becoming a minister. And so there’s a lot of different motivations, 27:49 but uh Garrison be came across that these guys were all ministers and stuff 27:56 that led to another one of his theories that they were these so-called somebody 28:01 later called these wandering bishops that were using these fringe or obscure 28:07 religious uh churches organizations as fronts to hide their activities as 28:15 political assassins. I mean, and part of that I think was based on 28:23 Jack Martin was feeding that them that information, but he was also involved in these groups as well, you know, uh, with 28:30 David Ferry. So, it’s like you’re involving all these other people’s, but your main witness witness 28:38 uh, you’re letting slide because he’s feeding you the information he want you 28:43 want to hear. you know, uh, Jack Martin. Jack Martin, another 28:49 crazy, unreliable narrator, just like Barbara Reed and, uh, Reverend Braymond 28:56 Raymond Brochures. And these were some of uh Garrison’s uh Yeah. I mean, I love the fact that that 29:01 brochures would went on went on uh a TV show and basically claimed that he had 29:07 channeled Lee RB Oswald at a seance, you know, and Oswald said, “Well, I’m 29:13 innocent.” You know, and and and that’s when the Garrison’s men really got interested. Oh, you know, well, he also 29:19 said he knew fairies, so they got interested. They they brought him to New Orleans. Of course, that was a great 29:24 holiday for brochures. He was off with the boys for a week, you know, having a great time. 29:31 Chrisman too got a vacation with he and his lawyer and he there was a big uh 29:36 Chrisman was trying to get more squeeze more money out of uh Garrison at the time. He was uh given $500 29:44 for he and his lawyer to go to New Orleans. And Gresman said, “Well, that 29:50 that’s not enough, you know, to pay our time.” But you look at $500 and 29:56 When was that? 19 68. 68. It’s more like uh I don’t know three 30:03 or $4,000. So was plenty. And he spent that weekend there and had a uh good 30:08 time apparently. Yeah. En enjoyed it. Uh 30:14 talking to I uh interviewed his son Fred Chrisman Jr. 30:20 who’s uh around. Oh wow. And uh he said that Yeah. He said that 30:25 uh Chrisman was uh absolutely thrilled, almost giddy to get the attention and go 30:32 to uh New Orleans. Uh Thornley’s wife or ex-wife that by that time wasn’t 30:38 thrilled at all. She was pissed and kind of upset by the whole thing. They were separated at the time. And so Fred 30:45 Chrisman Jr. had those memories. Do you think uh do you think I mean I mean Garrison learned about Chrisman through 30:52 uh and Beckham through an anonymous letter. Do you think Chrisman wrote that letter first? Yeah. First let me say Chrisman 30:59 had an extensive uh history of writing fake letters. So under uh assumed names. 31:07 Um some other insights from uh Fred Chrisman Jr. 31:14 But uh he lived with his his Chrisman and his wife were separated, 31:20 but uh Fred Jr. would visit like in the summer there in Tacoma. And Chrisman had 31:28 a uh office uh underground office, underground lair where he’d uh do what 31:36 uh Chrisman Jr. called uh his father would do his disinformation work. And 31:43 what he the setup he had uh he had there was a large desk there with three 31:48 different typewriters. So he he’d use different typewriters to produce letters, you know, that’d be harder to 31:54 trace. And he he’d collect uh different uh stuff like letter heads from 32:01 wherever, government agencies. if there was an estate sale or like a law firm 32:07 that went out of business, he’d collect different things that he could emboss to make it look official. So, there’s a lot 32:14 of evidence that he concocted a lot of letters and I have a few of those just 32:21 to show them in the book I’m working on on Chrisman. But unfortunately, a lot of 32:26 his files got his home files got tossed out. Chrisman Jr. has a few examples of 32:33 stuff and uh photos that he shared with me. So yeah, Chrisman had a history of 32:39 doing that. There’s two anonymous u letters. Uh the first one was uh 32:49 named five uh people who were involved who had information. So two of the 32:55 people named were Chrisman and Beckham. There was uh also uh Sergio Aracha and Lewis Rebel. 33:04 They were part of that friends of Democratic Cuba 33:11 anti-Castro uh group. Somehow they got lumped into this letter. And also somebody called 33:16 Martin Graci. There’s no Martin Graci. There was a Julio Graci. Uh so 33:24 and there was Bob Bob Lavender as well. Well, Bob came later. I guess he came 33:30 later. I think uh at least uh Garrison suspected 33:35 and Boxley, his investigator, they suspected he wrote this uh letter. It 33:41 wasn’t signed, but he’s connected to that letter. And that’s why Boxley went 33:46 to interview him about that. and he had some of the same information that appeared in that 33:52 letter. So, it’s hard to say exactly if uh 33:58 uh Lavender what his role was. Was he just repeating that information he had heard overheard 34:07 from Beckham and Chrisman or was he a collaborator in this uh farce? So, there 34:14 was that letter. Then there was the uh second anonymous letter 34:20 that that first anonymous letter was like 67 and early 68 uh was the one that 34:28 is just a one-page letter anonymous not signed to anybody. There’s this guy you 34:33 need to check on in Tacoma Chrisman. Uh he travels around the 34:40 country and he’s involved in this thing. Jim, you need to look at this guy. 34:46 Whatever. And that that seems more like a uh Chrisman letter. You just don’t 34:52 know for sure, you know. Yep. But Chrisman had this habit of or 34:59 he was trying to build this mystique around himself. I mean, it goes back to the UFO days and 35:07 uh I believe hoaxing the Mory Island UFO incidents in his letters about 35:14 battling the underground creatures, the daros in Burma during World War II. it 35:20 he was just creating this uh mystique around himself as this action 35:27 man who was involved in paranormal events and was a deep cover secret 35:34 agent. There is the famous uh document called the easy papers. Are you familiar with that? 35:40 Yeah. And I’m pretty sure Chrisman concocted that. It’s like a six-page 35:48 document allegedly written by an analyst at CIA who pulled Chrisman’s uh file to 35:57 lay out this information about him. And it’s obviously a hoax, but yeah, it 36:03 reads just like uh other Chrisman um 36:08 hoax letters. I shared that with Fred uh Chrisman Jr., Right. And 36:15 I’m not I’m not a big fan of AI or any of that, but he said we got a my son and 36:21 wife uh want to run this through chat GPT to compare it to uh his book Murder 36:28 of the City Tacoma, right? Which is right here. Yep. And according to Chatch GPT, 36:37 uh it’s the same author. Huh. Okay. What that means, I don’t know. There’s a 36:43 lot of slop that’s comes with AI, but it it was an interesting analysis. 36:50 Yeah. So, yeah. And and of course, you know, Garrison receives these anonymous 36:55 letters and he then has to bring Chrisman in to testify and Chrisman said nothing. I mean, really nothing. And 37:02 then Garrison went on to tell the HSCA, “You got to look at this guy Chrisman. He’s he’s a he’s a real suspect uh in 37:10 the assassination.” And lo and behold, he’s not even in Garrison’s book. Yeah, he had a bee in his bonnet about 37:17 uh Chrisman for sure. Um well, he was as you know, he was in the original version 37:25 of uh Chrisman’s book. Yeah, he was he was in the original version of Garrison, 37:31 excuse me. Yeah, Garrison’s book, but was removed later. I talked to Larry Hapen about that um 37:40 when uh Garrison was uh writing that called his assassination memoir whatever 37:47 on the trail of the assassins. Yeah, you’re familiar with that title. Um he intended yeah to have a chapter on 37:54 Chrisman. I think the first publisher looked at I forget who this was now, but 38:00 they said, “You promised us a connection with the CIA and it’s just not here with 38:06 Chrisman. You know, it’s not working at all.” There you go. Yeah. And so Garrison 38:12 regrouped and he contacted Fred Nukem who was involved in that touchup photo 38:18 and said at that time the U House select committee assassinations had ended and 38:25 Garrison wasn’t happy with the work they did on Chrisman. He he it was his opinion he gave them a bunch of leads to 38:32 follow where they could have proved it but nothing uh they you know determined 38:37 that Chrisman had an alibi and I mean comparing him to the photos, I guess, of 38:43 the three tramps, I guess, of the million different people claimed were 38:49 the three tramps. I guess Chrisman maybe vaguely looked like the old man [ _ ]
38:54
but uh whatever the case, uh Nukem
39:00
suggested Larry Happen is the guy who really looked into Chrisman during that uh period in 6970.
39:07
and happened and got a hold of Garrison and said so many words you know you’re barking up
39:15
a tree there it’s going to undermine your book by using this information about Chrisman
39:22
because like I saidan had determined he’s the one who found out that Chrisman had an alibi he’s a uh
39:30
he was a teacher I forget he was might have been teaching high school at that time and was at some conference or
39:37
something and met up with uh one of the persons who worked with
39:44
Chrisman at where was he at? That might have been I think it was Reneer High School in Reneer, Oregon
39:53
who uh saw Chrisman there on the day of the assassination and they provided
39:59
written uh records to the House Select Committee on Assassination. So I mean
40:05
that so that was kind of a important piece of uh information
40:12
witnesses that Hannan brought uh forward that basically threw a wet towel over at
40:18
least Chrisman being in Daily Plaza on the day of the assassination. Of course that didn’t stop any of these theories
40:26
from growing since Chrisman died after the House Select Committee on Assassination. Man,
40:32
you can get online and punch in Chrisman and uh a lot of people are sold on the
40:37
theory that he was one of the three tramps.
40:43
Yeah. No, and you know, and it’s and it’s it’s it’s and I mean even Garrison was like, “Well, isn’t it amazing that
40:49
Chrisman was uh you know, living uh in Oregon and and and Fred Clay Shaw went
40:55
to uh Portland after San Francisco after the assassination. He must have they
41:00
must have crossed paths. That’s why he was going to Oregon to see Chrisman. And he’s writing this to the HSCA. I mean,
41:08
it’s just incredible. Hey, I’ve been to Portland many times, too. Yeah. I’ve been to Tacoma, Seattle. So,
41:17
yep. As I could be connected. So, yeah. No, a fascinating character. Looking forward to your book. I think
41:23
it’s going to be a really really uh really good book. And uh we’ll go into uh Chrisman in more detail when that
41:29
book comes out. Uh Beckham sure Beckham is another you know character who is associated with Chrisman who went on to
41:37
become not only a garrison suspect but Joan Melon’s key suspect in her book
41:42
Farewell to Justice. What can you say? Um boy where to start with Beckham. I mean he was a lifelong
41:48
conman. you’d done some good work on him as well. I have an extensive write up in
41:54
the book, but he was involved in one scam over another over the years. He was
42:00
like a lot of people associated with Chrisman. He had it used different aliases. Mark Evans was one as a uh
42:08
rockabilly and southern singer or sometimes a uh preacher of some sort. He
42:14
had all these different scams and like Chrisman and uh some of these other
42:20
folks they were uh connected to were involved in diploma mills of one type or
42:28
another. And somehow the two uh and Beckham was pretty young. He was in his
42:34
early 20s at the time he met Chrisman in 1966. Was a pretty accomplished conman
42:40
by that time. And uh during the fall, I
42:46
guess he got there supposedly in the spring of ‘ 66 through the fall, they started a bunch of dummy companies. One
42:53
of them was a course to teach law enforcement that cost uh $500,
43:01
you know, and the FBI got involved in breaking that up. They’re also involved
43:06
in a kind of a scam charity called the Northwest Relief Society that uh would
43:13
leave uh donation cans in different bars and stuff and the Olympia PD I think got
43:18
in and broke that up. And I think there might have been more serious stuff going on. There’s definitely allegations that
43:26
there was a stolen car ring and just a lot of shady stuff. But uh Beckham
43:33
basically split. This was his mo in the end of ‘ 66 and went to uh Omaha where
43:40
he started the same kind of shenanigans again. A lot he’d go and uh he’d start
43:46
like a uh thrift store which he’d also set up as a universal life church where
43:53
he could be a minister like in the basement and it would like a fly by night. He’d
44:00
be there for a uh few m few months or a few weeks uh allegations that he was
44:07
fencing stolen material. Then he’d move on to the next scam. My
44:15
my favorite Beckham scam is in the early 60s when he he promoted a Ricky Nelson
44:20
concert and and of course lo and behold he brings in a Ricky not the Ricky Nelson
44:26
but somebody else with the same name and well it might have been him it might have been him posing as ran off with the
44:33
money and he did the thing on a more serious level the same like I said the same mo in 76 where and this was in Alabama he
44:42
started collecting money for for a benefit for a couple of police officers that were killed for a country and music
44:49
show. He claimed that initially Ernest Tubs was going to be there with his group and but he got indicted for wire
44:58
fraud and whatever and he ended up u federal indictment being prosecuted by
45:06
uh Jeff Sessions, a future attorney general of these United States. But he
45:12
used he got off. who was acquitted and he used the claim that he was working for the CIA and so he was like doing a
45:21
lot of this stuff in the interest of national security. I don’t know but it was there was enough
45:28
reasonable doubts in the juror’s minds to uh get him uh acquitted.
45:34
He had started another things he was starting were these fake detective
45:40
agencies and once one he named this the central
45:46
intelligence alliance or something he used the initial CIA so he was kind of being
45:53
truthful that he had started he he’d worked for the CIA
45:59
but yeah quite a uh character but it was that time. Yeah. And so came out of that
46:07
uh trial that uh once again these rumors were surfacing again that he’d worked
46:14
for the CIA somehow involved with the Kennedy assassination. That’s
46:20
when the House Select Committee got started uh talking to him again during
46:25
that period when he was being uh prosecuted for that Alabama scam. He was
46:32
in jail in Pineluff and that the HSCA started talking to him there and
46:38
interviewed him a couple more times. Uh, and he told and and from what I
46:44
understand, he got immunity to talk to them. So he could say any damn thing he wanted to and and he was
46:52
always kind of working the scam seemed like over the years to create a this
46:59
false story that he could uh profit on about him being involved in the uh
47:05
Kennedy uh assassination as an unwitting kind of dupe who got sucked into the
47:11
thing and he was during the uh time he was being uh He was talking to the HSCA.
47:20
He was also shopping around a book which was I guess some version of which was
47:25
later published in the 2000s called the remnants of truth. Yeah, it’s definitely remnants of uh
47:33
truth. So yeah, it was something he’s always trying to uh I mean my my favorite is when he was
47:38
testifying before the HSCA, he was listing off all his degrees, a degree in
47:44
this, degree in that, all the universities, and he said, “I have more degrees than a thermometer.”
47:50
He actually he stole that from uh one of his earlier uh trials when he was uh in
47:59
I think it was when he was in Omaha. He got busted for a diploma mill
48:05
and the judge chastised him and that the district attorney there said, “Uh, yeah,
48:10
this man has more degrees than a thermometer.” And so Beckham loved that and he
48:17
started using it himself. And that’s what’s funny about that book of his remnants of truth.
48:23
And not a really a whole lot in there about the Kennedy assassination. I mean, there’s a few pages. There’s like a
48:31
dozen or more pages of all his diplomas. Yep. There’s personal testimonies from his
48:38
family members. It’s like, okay, it’s it’s a bizarre book. And and uh I I
48:44
mean, it’s just what a what a bizarre story. And I can’t believe that Joan Melon bought it. I mean I mean he
48:50
actually she was convinced that he had converted to Judaism. She has a picture picture of him in his
48:56
in in these re rabbitical robes, you know, in her book. And then she has some claims that he had some sort of military
49:03
document that he gave her that convinced her that he was, you know, involved in all this. And of course, you never see
49:08
the document. Yeah. That was similar in that same book. Um I believe it’s in the
49:14
introduction of the book. She also goes after Thornley claiming he was CIA and
49:19
that she saw a document that proved that. And I later I asked her at the
49:26
time and that was when did that book come out? 2005 or something or
49:32
emailed her asking if I could get a copy of that. So at the time I read that I go whoa that’s you know I took it kind of
49:39
half seriously. I’d like to see that document that proves I finally she never sent me the
49:46
document at the time. She said she was sick or something. and when she got better, she’d get it to me. And but I
49:53
pursued I emailed her a couple times, never heard back. I finally figured out what the document was. And you can see
50:00
it in a post that the story of Discordia uh called was Carrie Thornley, CIA.
50:08
And so, no, that document did not prove Thornley was CIA. You can go people want
50:15
more information, they can go read that. But yeah, there’s and so there’s also the document where she claims the
50:23
document was from Chrisman claiming that Beckham was part of this operation at a
50:30
place called the farm. I think secret military kind of clockwork orange place
50:36
where they were creating these military assassins. And so yeah, I never bothered
50:42
asking her. I’d like to see what the document sounds like. another phony thing that maybe who knows Chrisman
50:48
cooked up or who knows we’ve never seen it. Why don’t you show it, you know?
50:54
Yeah. Um, now he does uh Beckham uh he does uh have a
51:04
ministry there in uh where is that Kentucky or at least did 10 15 years ago
51:10
and an actual uh church chapel that was a former u synagogue I think
51:18
right and so he’s kind of a self-styled uh
51:23
dude [Laughter] Uh yeah. So I guess he can say whatever
51:30
he wants to say. He’s a minister of after some fashion, I guess.
51:36
Yeah. You know, I strongly recommend people go read his uh his testimony
51:41
before the Garrison Grand Jury. It is abs it’s absolutely hysterically funny
51:46
when you read because it just the way he lists off his degrees and and the way he
51:52
answers questions and and uh you know and he he actually was accusing Garrison
51:57
of homosexuality in his grand testimony. That was the big bombshell he dropped at
52:03
the end just Yeah. Um what I think he was uh doing
52:10
it’s uh that he was he was nervous of obviously of going back to New Orleans,
52:17
but I don’t think he was nervous about Kennedy assassination stuff. He still had some charges hanging over his head
52:25
for a number of uh things. There was that uh store that he and his brother
52:32
ripped off. They both worked in this uh clothing store and they stole a huge amount of uh the uh
52:40
merchandise there and were going to start their own stores. Once again, you look at the numbers, it was like $12,000
52:46
of merchandise. So, you’re talking in today’s numbers $100,000 worth of
52:52
stuff. So, that charge was still hanging over his head. his brother had uh
52:59
already uh served his time, but uh Beckham, as he was want to do, had been
53:06
able to skip out on I think uh it looked like he faked uh a suicide at that time,
53:12
went into a mental facility, then got out of there before he could face those
53:18
charges. So that those were still going on. And uh there was also the uh
53:23
statutory rape charge that had never really been adjudicated either. So he
53:29
had had these things going on. And if you look at his testimony, he kind of touches on on all that stuff and
53:36
provides alternative facts of what you actually happened that he wasn’t. So, I
53:43
think he was just trying to spin and cover for his past criminal
53:49
activities. If if you kind of read between the lines and a lot of that stuff and he never
53:55
he never really addresses questions. He just goes off on and then of course he he he ends up
54:03
telling the HSCA about his involvement in the assassination. They they realize it’s all ridiculous. But then years
54:09
later, Garrison believes, “Oh, there’s a confession tape, right?” Yeah. It’s it’s it’s Beckham. And Garrison’s all
54:16
excited. I’m I’ve been vindicated. There’s a confession tape, you know, and I was right all along.
54:22
And it was just was just it was just Beckham, you know. Well, Guy Russo has a uh good story
54:29
about the confession tape. Yeah. Gus Gus Russo. Yeah. You interview You interviewed him. Did
54:36
he talk about that? Okay. Yeah. Well, he basically he went to see Beckham in his office in uh I don’t know, Kentucky or
54:43
Omaha and Beckham is all these fake diplomas on the wall and and at some point uh he sort of says, “Yeah, it’s
54:49
all ridiculous. Let’s just play guitar and they end up guitar the the afternoon rather than talk about anything
54:55
serious.” Well, Russo has this story where he uh
55:01
he was working with Bernard Festerwald and uh going to the National Archives
55:08
looking for stuff. And this was like uh kind of after
55:13
during and after the House Select Committee on Assassinations. And at that time, all that was available
55:22
were like old FBI files and other stuff. the House Select Committee stuff had
55:28
been embargoed and um and part of that embargo came
55:35
from the Black Congressional Caucus really started the force that started those
55:42
hearings on the different assassinations and they uh were trying to keep a lid on
55:48
the U MLK materials just because of the hijinks of the FBI all
55:55
that they thought it would tarnish his image. You know, there’s all the wire taps of his
56:02
affairs, alleged affairs, and that type of stuff. So, that’s kind of the reason there was the embargo on those
56:07
materials. But, and has Gus told you this story before? No. No. Go ahead. No.
56:12
Okay. And so, he was going in there and u
56:19
looking for stuff. And one day he went into a little al cove where he found a
56:25
uh like a uh sheet that listed a bunch of uh stuff and he looked at the
56:31
numbers and it was related to the embargoed material. So he took he
56:37
grabbed whatever this was a uh sheet of paper that was somewhere in this alco
56:42
took it back to his desk and started writing down all these he rec it didn’t say the house select committee and
56:49
assassinations he just recognized the series of numbers he goes whoa that’s
56:54
interesting that’s all the embargoed material
56:59
and there’s a a list of everything one of the stuff on there was confession tape da da Huh? So what he did, he
57:08
thought maybe I can do something with this list. Um he thought
57:16
during certain times like during lunch uh breaks and uh maybe on weekends there
57:23
was more inexperienced staff there uh students uh and people maybe not quite
57:31
uh as swift on the uptake as the regular archivist who manages. I’ll take some of
57:38
those numbers to them and see what they bring back to me. And sure enough, they brought back to him some of these
57:44
embargoed materials. Uh, a lot of them were these cassette tapes,
57:50
right? Yeah. And so he So he’s kind of freaking out here. Whoa.
57:56
He goes back and one of them, I’m not sure if he ever actually listened to the
58:01
uh Beckham tape, but he started listening to these tapes on the
58:07
equipment there. And the archives would uh supply you
58:12
with a tape player and a duplicate thing where you could make copies. So that was the plan. he was going to come in there
58:19
during lunchtime, start getting these embargoed classified materials basically
58:27
and uh but he it it was going to take a long time and so uh Fster said, “Well,
58:35
maybe we can get some machine where you can high do a high-speed dubbing.” and they got a hold of this big clanky
58:43
huge machine that he was somehow able to get into the archives and started uh
58:49
burning multiple copies at high speed and got busted by somebody caught him
58:56
there. They would first they caught him with you can’t use that high-speed machines. You’re going to break the damn
59:01
tapes. Oh, okay. Well, they and he got clearance from the people at who are
59:07
working during lunchtime. But this is one of the regular archists and he so you got to stop that right now. You
59:13
can’t use them. The archives started walking away. He turned back and saw it was the embargoed material and he just
59:19
flipped out, you know, and took all the material and u re so hight tailed it out of there
59:26
and went back home to Maryland or where it was that weekend uh expecting the FBI
59:31
to raid him, but nothing ever came of it. Uh, and you could, you should ask
59:37
Gus. He has a write up of this. It’s like a dozen pages of this whole uh,
59:43
experience. But that’s when he first heard about that uh, confession confession tape which led him to doing
59:51
some research on Beckham and like you said uh, going to his storefront and
59:57
guess he was in Kentucky at that time and figuring out Yeah. that he was just a uh good humored kind of con man. And
1:00:06
they ended up jamming on guitars and singing uh that night.
1:00:12
Yeah. It’s it’s it’s I mean it’s just I mean I could I could I could just sense how excited Garrison was to believe that
1:00:20
he was finally being vindicated, you know, by by Thomas Beckham. I mean it’s just so funny. Well, there
1:00:28
yeah, there had been these rumors about the uh confession tape and Garrison heard about it. Different stappers was
1:00:35
saying there’s a con uh confession and so that was spreading through the you
1:00:42
know JFK research community at that time. It was the hot hot thing.
1:00:47
Beckham’s confession tape which confessed to all number of things. Yeah. and
1:00:54
implicated dozens of different people, you know, that had uh materialized
1:01:01
during the Garrison investigation. I mean, Beckham connected them all or
1:01:08
claimed that, you know, they were all connected. Oswald, Ruby,
1:01:13
uh, Banister, etc., etc. Yeah, he loved to drop names. I mean,
1:01:19
he’s just absolutely incredible. And uh what a what a character. I mean just
1:01:24
really funny. I mean if I if you again if you read his testimony either the HSCA or Garrison’s grand jury, you can’t
1:01:30
help but laugh when you read it. I mean it’s actually quite funny when you read it. I don’t know. I just don’t know how Garrison
1:01:36
could have taken him seriously um after that. But he did. Of course another name is not in Garrison’s book.
1:01:43
He left Beckham out of his book as well. That is true. Yeah.
1:01:48
I wonder why. Yeah. But like I said, Joan Millan ran with it and gave him his story and other
1:01:56
shot in the arm. Yep. And and yeah, and she she bought a hook, line, and sinker, including the
1:02:01
fact that he even converted to Judaism, which was absolutely hysterical. And it was his own branch of Judaism,
1:02:08
right? It was his own special branch, you know. I don’t know. I don’t know what the heck it is, but he wears a yarmaka. And uh I
1:02:14
think I think uh he might have some uh
1:02:19
family ties are Jewish to Judaism, but it’s Yeah, it’s pretty
1:02:25
Well, he changed he sort of changed his name for a while. So it was like B apostrophe E C E sound like it was a a
1:02:33
Jewish name. Yeah. Yep. You can’t make this stuff up.
1:02:40
Okay. So tell me what’s next? You’re writing a book on Chrisman. Tell us about your your upcoming book and where you’re going to go from there.
1:02:47
Yeah, it’s about it’s almost done. Like I mentioned, I uh interviewed Fred
1:02:52
Chrisman Jr. which was interesting getting uh hold of him and he’s been really uh
1:02:59
helpful in the endeavor and other people I mentioned like Larry Hapan and uh
1:03:04
Hannon, that’s how you say it. Yeah. Larry happening and uh number of other people. It it’s
1:03:12
been going on for numbers years. It was kind of like the uh Thornley book where just out of an
1:03:19
interest I’d gathered material on Thornley and you know after a while you
1:03:24
just have so much stuff and written articles related to Charisman. It got to
1:03:30
a point, well, maybe this is a book. And yeah, I’ve learned
1:03:35
quite a bit over time to really expand on, you know, what’s out there already.
1:03:42
Well, I can’t wait till it comes out and we’ll have you back on to uh discuss the book when the book is published. Uh it’s
1:03:49
it’s definitely a needed book and uh your stuff is absolutely magnificent. So, uh, u, we’ll put links into your
1:03:56
books in the description of the of the podcast and, uh, I strongly recommend everybody go and buy Adam Goritley’s
1:04:02
books. They’re just terrific. Yeah. And check out Historia Discordia that has some of JFK assassination
1:04:09
stuff, but lot of good stuff. A lot of stuff on these characters are are on online on
1:04:15
your website. Very important stuff with documents, photographs, um, etc. A lot of good primary material. Yeah, I got
1:04:22
pretty obsessive for a while with some of those posts there. I look back at them now, it’s like, good lord, 10,000
1:04:30
words in a blog post. The hell’s wrong with you? Yeah, it’s too much.
1:04:37
Okay. Well, thank you very much and uh we’ll be back in touch uh sometime next year.
1:04:42
Okay, sounds good. Thanks,

Technical Notes:

This was originally shot as a 1280 by 720 ZOOM Call. I edited the first few shots using Adobe After Effects (“detail Preserving Upscale” with the rest edited with Adobe Premiere and it’s basic scaling feature. ( I think I over did the extreme close up on the guests face.)

I downloaded several book covers from AMAZON and other websites. Then I cut them up and layered them in Adobe Photoshop. Then I animated them into motion graphics pieces in Adobe After Effects.

One of the animated book covers has some 2d animation made with Adobe Animate (formerly Flash. The Masonic “33” and the spinning Atomic symbol were made with Animate:

Delusion, Episode 23, Dan Evans

www.mattkprovideo.com/2025/08/29/delusion-episode-23-dan-evans/

On The Trail of Delusion, Episode 23, Daniel Evans

Lifelong JFK Assassination researcher and Dallas area Tour guide Dan Evans tells Fred Litwin about his journey into JFKA obsession and what he tells visitors what he thinks about Conspiracy Theories.

www.tripadvisor.com/AttractionProductReview-g55711-d12613780-JFK_Assassination_and_Museum_Tour_with_Lee_Harvey_Oswald_Rooming_House-Dallas_Texas.html